Structure and Processes of Existing Practice in Radiotherapy Peer Review: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Tài liệu tham khảo
Royal College of Radiologists
Vinod, 2016, Uncertainties in volume delineation in radiation oncology: a systematic review and recommendations for future studies, Radiother Oncol, 121, 169, 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.009
Peters, 2010, Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and quality in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer: results from TROG 02.02, J Clin Oncol, 28, 2996, 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4498
Brade, 2018, Radiation therapy quality assurance (RTQA) of concurrent chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the PROCLAIM phase 3 trial, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 101, 927, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.015
Ohri, 2013, Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials, J Natl Canc Inst, 105, 387, 10.1093/jnci/djt001
Fairchild, 2013, Does quality of radiation therapy predict outcomes of multicenter cooperative group trials? A literature review, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 87, 246, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.03.036
Cox, 2019, Impact of deviations in target volume delineation - time for a new RTQA approach?, Radiother Oncol, 137, 1, 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.012
Joye, 2014, Does a central review platform improve the quality of radiotherapy for rectal cancer? Results of a national quality assurance project, Radiother Oncol, 111, 400, 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.03.003
Marks, 2013, Enhancing the role of case-oriented peer review to improve quality and safety in radiation oncology: executive summary, Pract Radiat Oncol, 3, 149, 10.1016/j.prro.2012.11.010
Brunskill, 2017, Does peer review of radiation plans affect clinical care? A systematic review of the literature, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 97, 27, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.09.015
Huo, 2017, Evidence-based peer review for radiation therapy – updated review of the literature with a focus on tumour subsite and treatment modality, Clin Oncol, 29, 680, 10.1016/j.clon.2017.04.038
Moher, 2009, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, J Clin Epidemiol, 62, 1006, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
Albert, 2018, Analysis of a real time group consensus peer review process in radiation oncology: an evaluation of effectiveness and feasibility, Radiat Oncol, 13, 239, 10.1186/s13014-018-1190-z
Ballo, 2014, Prospective peer review quality assurance for outpatient radiation therapy, Pract Radiat Oncol, 4, 279, 10.1016/j.prro.2013.11.004
Boxer, 2009, Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department, J Med Imag Radiat Oncol, 53, 405, 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02096.x
Brammer, 2014, Impact of the introduction of weekly radiotherapy quality assurance meetings at one UK cancer centre, Br J Radiol, 87, 20140422, 10.1259/bjr.20140422
Braunstein, 2017, Impact of neuroradiology-based peer review on head and neck radiotherapy target delineation, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 38, 146, 10.3174/ajnr.A4963
Brundage, 1999, A real-time audit of radiation therapy in a regional cancer center, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 43, 115, 10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00368-X
Cardenas, 2017, Prospective qualitative and quantitative analysis of real-time peer review quality assurance rounds incorporating direct physical examination for head and neck cancer radiation therapy, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 98, 532, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.019
Cox, 2015, Prospective contouring rounds: a novel, high-impact tool for optimizing quality assurance, Pract Radiat Oncol, 5, e431, 10.1016/j.prro.2015.05.005
Fong, 2017, Implementing head and neck contouring peer review without pathway delay: the on-demand approach, Clin Oncol, 29, 841, 10.1016/j.clon.2017.09.005
Lefresne, 2013, Impact of quality assurance rounds in a Canadian radiation therapy department, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 85, E117, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.10.015
Lymberiou, 2015, Predictors of breast radiotherapy plan modifications: quality assurance rounds in a large cancer centre, Radiother Oncol, 114, 17, 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.042
Matuszak, 2016, Enhancing safety and quality through preplanning peer review for patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy, Pract Radiat Oncol, 6, E39, 10.1016/j.prro.2015.09.009
Mitchell, 2017, Detailed prospective peer review in a community radiation oncology clinic, Pract Radiat Oncol, 7, 50, 10.1016/j.prro.2016.08.011
Pham, 2018, Pre-treatment peer-review: enhancing value through increased efficiency and effectiveness of radiation oncology peer review, J Radiat Oncol, 7, 97
Rooney, 2014, The impact of colleague peer-review on the radiotherapy treatment planning process in the radical treatment of lung cancer, Clin Oncol, 26, S3, 10.1016/j.clon.2014.04.006
Rosenthal, 2006, Importance of patient examination to clinical quality assurance in head and neck radiation oncology, Head Neck, 28, 967, 10.1002/hed.20446
Zairis, 2017, Prospective analysis of radiation oncology image and plan-driven peer review for head and neck cancer, Head Neck, 39, 1603, 10.1002/hed.24800
Lawrence, 2012, Quality assurance peer review chart rounds in 2011: a survey of academic institutions in the United States, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 84, 590, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.029
Kapoor, 2012, 211: Peer review system for ensuring quality of radiation therapy treatments, Med Phys, 39, 3751, 10.1118/1.4735272
Mackenzie, 2016, Peer review of radiotherapy planning: quantifying outcomes and a proposal for prospective data collection, Clin Oncol, 28, E192, 10.1016/j.clon.2016.08.012
Toohey, 2008, RANZCR 2006 peer review audit instrument, J Med Imag Radiat Oncol, 52, 403, 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2008.01939.x