Santini F, Luciani GB, Restivo S, et al. Over twenty-year follow-up of the standard Hancock porcine bioprosthesis implanted in the mitral position. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S232–5.
Nishida T, Sonoda H, Oishi Y, et al. Mechanical prosthesis is reasonable for mitral valve replacement in patients approximately 65 years of age. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1614–20.
Shimazaki Y, Kuraoka S, Takeda F, et al. Mitral valve re-replacement for impaired bioprosthesis after 19 years in a patient undergoing steroid treatment. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004;12:45–7.
Niinami H, Naito Y, Koyanagi H, et al. Malfunction of a Hancock bioprosthesis in the mitral position 24 years after initial implantation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000;9:810–2.
Wilbring M, Alexiou K, Tugtekin SM, et al. Transapical transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for deteriorated mitral valve bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:111–7.
Valente M, Minarini M, Thiene G, et al. The pathology of Hancock standard porcine valve prosthesis: a 20-year span of experience. J Card Surg. 1990;5:328–35.
Eishi K, Ishibashi-Ueda H, Nakano K, et al. Calcific degeneration of bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients receiving steroid therapy. J Heart Valve Dis. 1996;5:668–72.