Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Beauducel, 2005, Simulation study on fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis based on data with slightly distorted simple structure, Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 41, 10.1207/s15328007sem1201_3
Bollen, 1989
Breiman, 2001, Statistical modeling: the two cultures, Statistical Science, 16, 199, 10.1214/ss/1009213726
Burnham, 2002
Fan, 2005, Sensitivity of fit indices to misspecified structural or measurement model components: rationale of two-index strategy revisited, Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343, 10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
Fisher, 1956
Gigerenzer, 2004, Mindless statistics, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33, 587, 10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033
Harrell, 2001
Hastie, 2001
Hu, 1999, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1, 10.1080/10705519909540118
Marsh, 2004, In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings, Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320, 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
Meehl, 1997, Credentialed persons, credentialed knowledge, Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 4, 91, 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1997.tb00103.x
Mosteller, 1977
Muthen, 2002, How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power, Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
Raju, 2002, Measurement equivalence: a comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 517, 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.517
Reise, 1993, Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance, Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552, 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.552