Stripe wear rates in alumina THR—Comparison of microseparation simulator study with retrieved implants

M. Manaka1, Ian C. Clarke1, Kengo Yamamoto2, Takaaki Shishido2, Allen Gustafson1, Atsuhiro Imakiire2
1Peterson Tribology Laboratory, Orthopaedic Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University, 11406 Loma Linda Drive, Suite 606, Loma Linda, California 92354
2Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1, Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-KU, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan

Tóm tắt

AbstractAlumina‐on‐alumina hip implants with microseparation were run in a hip simulator for comparison of the nonseparation simulator mode and retrievals. The 28‐, 32‐, and 36‐mm Biolox‐forte implants were run to 5 million cycles with the use of 50% newborn calf serum. Howmedica Osteonics Trident cups with titanium backing were used in all sets. In standard (STD) and microseparation (MSX) mode, the typical biphasic wear trend was evident, but the MSX test mode had much higher magnitudes. There was a 5‐fold increase for run‐in wear and up to a 35‐fold increase in steady‐state wear. The stripe wear on the ball formed early, but did not progress in grade beyond 0.6 Mc. The locations of the stripes were similar in retrieved and simulator balls. However, the stripes from the simulator were narrower than short‐term retrievals and much narrower than some long‐term retrievals. The long‐term retrieved balls had a grade of wear greater than the simulators. In vivo a broader range of motion occurs and this may lead to the wider stripe observed on the retrievals. These observations suggested that simulators could produce the loading and kinematics similar to a patient walking but not necessarily the variety of motions possible in the in vivo situation. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 69B: 149–157, 2004

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Boutin P, 1972, Arthroplastie totale de hanche par prothese en alumine frittee, Rev Chirol Orthop, 58, 229

10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00081-2

10.1023/A:1008970027306

DennisD KomistekR OchoaJ NorthcutE HammillC.In vivodetermination of hip joint separation in subject having either a metal‐on‐metal or metal‐on‐polyethylene THA. Transactions of the 46th Annual Meeting Orthopaedic Research Society;2000. p507.

Plitz W, 1982, Wear of alumina–ceramic hip joint: Some clinical and tribological aspects, Biomaterials, 1980, 187

10.1054/arth.2000.8100

10.1023/A:1012802308636

10.1002/jbm.b.10048

Dorlot J, 1992, Long‐term effects of alumina components in total hip prosthesis, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 282, 47, 10.1097/00003086-199209000-00006

McKellopH LuB BenyaP.Friction lubrication and wear of cobalt‐chromium alumina and zirconia hip prostheses compared on a joint simulator. Transactions of the 38th Annual Meeting Orthopaedic Research Society;1992. p402.

YongSWet al.Impingement in total hip arthroplasty. A study of retrieved acetabular components. Transactions of the 47th Annual Meeting Orthopaedic Research Society;2001. p1070.

HattonA InghamE MatthewsJB FisherJ.Cytokine release by human peripheral blood macrophages after stimulation with alumina ceramic particlesin vivo—A comparison with UHMWPE. Transactions of the 6thWorld Congress Biomaterials;2000. p1188.

WalterWL InsleyG WalterWK TukeM.The mechanics of stripe wear formation in modern ceramic on ceramic bearings. Transactions of the 70th Annual Meeting American Academy Orthopaedic Surgeons;2003. p278.

10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00040-9