Strength, diversity and plasticity of postmating reproductive barriers between two hybridizing oak species (Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl.)

Journal of Evolutionary Biology - Tập 25 Số 1 - Trang 157-173 - 2012
Pierre Abadie1,2, Geneviève Roussel1,2, Benjamin Dencausse1,2, Claude-Laurent Bonnet1,2, Evangelista Bertocchi1,2, Jean‐Marc Louvet1,2, Antoine Kremer1,2, Pauline Garnier‐géré1,2
1INRA, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, 69 route d’Arcachon, F-33612 Cestas, France
2Université de Bordeaux, UMR 1202 BIOGECO, 69 route d’Arcachon, F-33612 Cestas, France

Tóm tắt

AbstractVery little is known about the nature and strength of reproductive isolation (RI) in Quercus species, despite extensive research on the estimation and evolutionary significance of hybridization rates. We characterized postmating pre‐ and postzygotic RI between two hybridizing oak species, Quercus robur and Quercus petraea, using a large set of controlled crosses between different genotypes. Various traits potentially associated with reproductive barriers were quantified at several life history stages, from pollen–pistil interactions to seed set and progeny fitness‐related traits. Results indicate strong intrinsic postmating prezygotic barriers, with significant barriers also at the postzygotic level, but relatively weaker extrinsic barriers on early hybrid fitness measures assessed in controlled conditions. Using general linear modelling of common garden data with clonal replicates, we showed that most traits exhibited important genotypic differences, as well as different levels of sensitivity to micro‐environmental heterogeneity. These new findings suggest a large potential genetic diversity and plasticity of reproductive barriers and are confronted with hybridization evidence in these oak species.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x

Arnold M., 2006, Evolution Through Genetic Exchange

10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03898.x

10.1007/s001220050996

10.1007/s004970100100

10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00344.x

10.2307/1218998

10.1007/s10709-008-9321-3

10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00538.x

10.3732/ajb.0800315

10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00280-3

10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02687.x

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01143.x

Craft K.J., 2006, Population Differentiation Among Three Species of White Oak in Northeastern Illinois, 10.1139/x05-234

10.1186/1471-2148-7-218

10.1186/1471-2148-9-284

Darwin C., 1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01721.x

10.1038/hdy.2009.134

10.1051/forest:19960253

10.1093/forestry/27.1.1

10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01531.x

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00233.x

Gavrilets S., 2005, “Adaptive speciation”– It is not that easy: a reply to Doebeli et al, Evolution, 59, 696

Gömöry D., 2000, A gene coding for a non‐specific NAD‐dependent dehydrogenase shows a strong differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea, For. Genet., 7, 167

10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.02983.x

10.1098/rstb.2003.1284

10.1007/s10682-007-9240-2

10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00939.x

10.3109/10520297009085351

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.109

10.1080/028275800447922

10.1080/02827580801995331

10.1051/forest/2009058

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x

Kendall M.G., 1987, The Advanced Theory of Statistics

10.2307/2656942

10.1051/forest:2002065

Kuiper N.H., 1962, Tests concerning random points on a circle, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. A, 63, 38

Lepais O.2008.Dynamique d’hybridation dans le complexe d’espèces des chênes blancs européens (Ph. D.). Ecole doctorale Sciences et Environnement Université Bordeaux 1 Talence France.

10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01101.x

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04137.x

Levene H., 1960, Contributions to Probability and Statistics, 278

10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02889.x

10.1098/rstb.2008.0078

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02896.x

10.1006/dbio.1993.1022

10.1098/rstb.2008.0064

10.1105/tpc.104.161130

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02418.x

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02736.x

10.1016/j.foreco.2010.02.013

10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.001

10.1051/forest:2006086

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00628.x

10.1051/forest:2006068

10.1007/s001220051393

10.1073/pnas.94.18.9996

10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00944.x

10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02446.x

10.1093/treephys/22.6.413

10.1038/nrg2718

R Development Core Team, 2010, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00360.x

Rice W.R., 1993, Laboratory Experiments on Speciation : What Have We Learned in 40 Years?

10.1093/aob/mcq126

10.1126/science.1137729

10.1002/j.1537-2197.1995.tb15672.x

Roussel G., 2009, Technique d’empochage de jeunes chênes (10 ans) pour la réalisation de croisements contrôlés)

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00715.x

10.1038/sj.hdy.6800358

10.1038/nature04566

10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02198-X

10.1007/s00122-004-1789-3

10.1534/genetics.104.026849

10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591

Sokal R.R., 1995, Biometry

10.7312/steb94536

10.1051/forest:19930713

Steinhoff S., 1998, Kontrollierte Kreuzungen zwischen Stiel‐ und Traubeneiche – Ergebnisse und Folgerungen, Allg. Forst Jagdz., 169, 163

10.1086/285817

10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00637.x

10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092356

10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02177-2

10.2307/1219444

10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02188-7

10.1073/pnas.0901397106

10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00707.x

10.1139/X09-054

10.1073/pnas.0501844102

10.2307/2265753

10.1038/hdy.2008.69

10.1073/pnas.96.16.9201

10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00968.x

10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00335.x

10.1038/nrg1269

10.1051/forest:19970503