Stochastic finite-fault modeling of M w 5.4 earthquake along Uttarakhand–Nepal border

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 75 Số 2 - Trang 1145-1166 - 2015
Himanshu Mittal1, Ashok Kumar2
1Centre of Excellence in Disaster Mitigation and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India
2Department of Earthquake Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ambraseys N, Jackson D (2003) A note on early earthquakes in northern India and southern Tibet. Curr Sci 84(4):570–582

Anderson J, Hough S (1984) A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies. Bull Seism Soc Am 74:1969–1993

Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:2181–2205

Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1997) Modelling finite fault radiation from the ω n spectrum. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:67–84

Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1998a) FINSIM: a FORTRAN program for simulating stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults. Seismol Res Lett 69:27–32

Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1998b) Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. I. Validation on rock sites. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:1392–1401

Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1999) Generic finite-fault model for ground motion prediction in eastern north America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(3):608–625

Beresnev IA, Nightengale AM, Walter J, Silva WJ (2002) Properties of vertical ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:3152–3164

Bilham R (1995) Location and magnitude of the Nepal earthquake and its relation to the rupture zones of the contiguous great Himalayan earthquakes. Curr Sci 69:101–128

Bilham R, Gaur VK, Molnar P (2001) Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293:1442–1444

BIS (2002) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, IS 1893 (part 1). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1865–1894

Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using stochastic method. Pure appl Geophys 160:635–676

Boore DM, Atkinson G (1987) Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard rock sites in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:440–467

Boore DM, Joyner WB (1997) Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull Seism Soc Am 87:327–341

Borcherdt RD (1970) Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60:29–61

Chen W, Molnar P (1983) Focal depths of intracontinental and intraplate earthquakes and their implications for the thermal and mechanical properties of the lithosphere. J Geophys Res 88:4183–4214

Chopra S, Kumar D, Rastogi BK (2010) Estimation of strong ground motions for 2001 Bhuj (Mw 7.6), India earthquake. Pure appl Geophys 167(11):1317–1330

Chopra S, Kumar D, Choudhury P, Yadav RBS (2012a) Stochastic finite fault modelling of Mw 4.8 earthquake in Kachchh, Gujarat, India. J Seismol 16:435–449

Chopra S, Kumar V, Suthar A, Kumar P (2012b) Modeling of strong ground motions for 1991 Uttarkashi, 1999 Chamoli earthquakes, and a hypothetical great earthquake in Garhwal–Kumaun Himalaya. Nat Hazards 64(2):1141–1159

Chopra S, Kumar D, Rastogi BK, Choudhury P, Yadav RBS (2013) Estimation of seismic hazard in Gujarat region, India. Nat Hazards 65:1157–1178

Gansser A (1964) Geology of the Himalayas. Interscience, New York 289

Hanks TC, Bakun WH (2008) M-logA observations for recent large earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(1):490–494

Hanks TC, McGuire RK (1981) The character of high frequency strong ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2071–2095

Hartzell S (1978) Earthquake aftershock as Green’s functions. Geophys Res Lett 5:1–4

Joshi A, Kumar B, Sinvhal A, Sinvhal H (1999) Generation of synthetic accelerograms by modelling of rupture plane. ISET J Earthq Technol 36:43–60

Khattri KN (1992) Local seismic investigations in Garhwal–Kumaon Himalaya. Geol Soc India Mem 23:45–66

Khattri KN (1999) An evaluation of earthquakes hazard and risk in northern India. Himal Geol 20:1–46

Khattri KN, Chander R, Gaur VK, Sarkar I, Kumar S (1989) New seismological results on the tectonics of the Garhwal Himalaya. Proc Indian Acad Sci Earth Planet Sci 98:91–109

Khattri KN, Yu G, Anderson JG, Brune JN, Zeng Y (1994) Seismic hazard estimation using modelling of earthquake strong ground motions: a brief analysis of 1991 Uttarkashi earthquake, Himalaya and prognostication for a earthquake in the region. Curr Sci 67:343–353

Konno K, Ohmachi T (1998) Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(1):228–241

Kumar N, Sharma J, Arora BR, Mukopadhyay S (2009) Seismotectonic model of the Kangra–Chamba sector of Northwest Himalaya: constraints from joint hypocenter determination and focal mechanism. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:95–109

Kumar A, Mittal H, Sachdeva R, Kumar A (2012) Indian strong motion instrumentation network. Seismol Res Lett 83(1):59–66

Leonard M (2010) Earthquake fault scaling: self-consistent relating of rupture length, width, average displacement, and moment release. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(5A):1971–1988

Lermo J, Garcia JC (1994) Are microtremors useful in site response evaluation? Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:1350–1364

Liang X, Zhou S, Chen YJ, Jin G, Xiao L, Liu P, Fu Y, Tang Y, Lou X, Ning J (2008) Earthquake distribution in Southern Tibet and its tectonic implications. J Geophys Res 113:B12409. doi: 10.1029/2007JB005101

Loukachev I, Pralle N, Gudehus G (2002) Dilatancy-induced P waves as evidence for nonlinear soil behavior. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:854–862

Mittal H, Kumar A, Ramhmachhuani R (2012a) Indian national strong motion instrumentation network and site characterization of its stations. Int J Geosci 3(6):1151–1167

Mittal H, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kamal (2012b) Estimation of Ground Motion in Delhi using 7th September 2011 Earthquake. Paper ID 0283, 15WCEE, Lisbon

Mittal H, Kamal, Kumar A, Singh SK (2013a) Estimation of site effects in Delhi using standard spectral ratio. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 50:53–61

Mittal H, Kumar A, Kumar A (2013b) Site effects estimation in Delhi from the Indian strong motion instrumentation network. Seismol Res Lett 84(1):33–41

Mittal H, Kumar A, Kamal (2013c) Ground motion estimation in Delhi from postulated regional and local earthquakes. J Seismol 17(2):593–605

Mittal H, Kumar A, Kamal, Kumar A (2014) Source study of Mw 5.4 4th April 2011 India–Nepal Border Earthquake and Scenario events in Kumaun–Garhwal region. Arab J Geosci (Under review)

Monsalve G, Sheehan A, Schulte-Pelkum V, Rajaure S, Pandey MR, Wu F (2006) Seismicity and one dimensional velocity structure of the Himalayan collision zone: earthquakes in the crust and upper mantle. J Geophys Res 111:B10301. doi: 10.1029/2005JB004062

Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:995–1010

Motazedian D, Moinfar A (2006) Hybrid stochastic finite fault modelling of 2003, M6.5 Bam earthquake (Iran). J Seismol 10:91–103

Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using micro-tremor on the ground surface. QR RTRI 30:25–33

Nath SK, Raj A, Thingbaijam KKS, Kumar A (2009) Ground motion synthesis and seismic scenario in Guwahati city—a stochastic approach. Seismol Res Lett 80:233–242

Ni J, Barazangi M (1984) Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone: geometry of the under-thrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalayas. J Geophys Res 89:1147–1163

Ordaz M, Arboleda J, Singh SK (1995) A scheme of random summation of an empirical Green’s function to estimate ground motions from future large earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:1635–1647

RaghuKanth STG, Kavitha B (2013) Stochastic finite fault modeling of subduction Zone Earthquakes in Northeastern India. Pure appl Geophys 170(11):1705–1727

Raghukanth STG, Sreelatha S, Dash SK (2008) Ground motion estimation at Guwahati city for an Mw 8.1 earthquake in the Shillong plateau. Tectonophysics 448:98–114

Seeber L, Armbruster JG (1981) Great detachment earthquakes along the Himalayan arc and long-term forecasting, in Earthquake prediction: an international review. Maurice Ewing Series 4, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 259–277

Singh SK, Ordaz M, Dattatrayam RS, Gupta HK (1999) A spectral analysis of the May 21, 1997, Jabalpur, India earthquake (Mw = 5.8) and estimation of ground motion from future earthquakes in the Indian shield region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1620–1630

Singh SK, Mohanty WK, Bansal BK, Roonwal GS (2002) Ground motion in Delhi from future large/great earthquakes in the central seismic gap of the Himalayan arc. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:555–569

Sokolov VY, Loh C-H, Jean W-Y (2007) Application of horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) Fourier spectral ratio for analysis of site effect on rock (NEHRP-class B) sites in Taiwan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:314–323

Stiedl JH, Tumarkin AG, Archuleta RJ (1996) What is a reference site? Bull Seism Soc Am 86:1733–1748

Tohdo M, Hatori T, Chiba O, Takahashi K, Takemura M, Tanaka H (1995) Characteristics of vertical seismic motions and Qp-values in sedimentary layers. J Struct Constr Eng Trans Archit Inst Jpn 475:45–54 (in Japanese with English abstract)

Ugurhan B, Askan A (2010) Stochastic strong ground motion simulation of the 12 November 1999 Düzce (Turkey) earthquake using a dynamic corner frequency approach. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:1–27

Valdiya KS (1980) Geology of Kumaun Lesser Himalaya, interim record: Dehradun. Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, p 291

Valdiya KS (2001) Reactivation of terrain-defining boundary thrusts in Central sector of the Himalaya: implication. Curr Sci 81:1418–1430

Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002

Yin A (2006) Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen as constrain by along strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history and foreland sedimentation. Earth Sci Rev 76:1–132

Yu G, Khattri KN, Anderson JG, Brune JN, Zeng Y (1995) Strong ground motion from Uttarkashi, Himalaya, India, earthquake: comparison of observations with synthetics using the composite source model. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:31–50