Stochastic Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Tipping Risk

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 65 - Trang 573-598 - 2016
Thomas S. Lontzek1, Daiju Narita2,3, Ole Wilms1
1Department of Business Administration, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, Germany
3Graduate School of Economics and Business Administration, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Tóm tắt

One of the major potential consequences of climate change is damage to earth’s ecosystems, damage which could manifest itself in the form of tipping risks. We establish an economic growth model of ecosystem tipping risks, set in the context of possible forest dieback. We consider different specifications of impacts arising from the forest dieback tipping point, specifications such as changes in the system dynamics of the forests, changes in the forest mass, and impacts on economic output. We also consider endogenous and exogenous tipping point probabilities. For each specification we compute the optimal policies for forest management and emission control. Our results show qualitative differences in patterns of post-tipping event, optimal forest harvest, and either precautionary or aggressive pre-tipping event harvest patterns, a feature consistent with the findings of the existing literature. Optimal control of deforestation and carbon dioxide emission reduction also exhibits varied patterns of post- and pre-tipping levels depending on the nature of the tipping risk. Still, today’s optimal policy is one of more stringent emissions control in presence of a potential forest dieback tipping point.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bahn O, Haurie A, Malhamé R (2008) A stochastic control model for optimal timing of climate policies. Automatica 44(6):1545–1558 Bansal R, Yaron A (2004) Risks for the long run: a potential resolution of asset pricing puzzles. J Finance 59(4):1481–1509 Bansal R, Kiku D, Yaron A (2012) An empirical evaluation of the long-run risks model for asset prices. Crit Finance Rev 1(1):183–221 Barnosky AD, Hadly J, Bascompte EA, Berlow EL, Brown JH, Fortelius M, Getz WM, Harte J, Hastings A, Marquet PA, Martinez ND, Mooers A, Roopnarine P, Vermeij G, Williams JW, Gillespie R, Kitzes J, Marshall C, Matzke N, Mindell DP, Revilla E, Smith AB (2012) Approaching a state shift in earth’s biosphere. Nature 486:52–58 Biggs R, Blenckner T, Folke C, Gordon L, Norström A, Nyström M, Peterson G (2011) Regime shifts. University of California Press, Berkeley Brozović N, Schlenker W (2011) Optimal management of an ecosystem with an unknown threshold. Ecol Econ 70:627–640 Cai Y, Judd KL, Lontzek TS (2013) The social cost of stochastic and irreversible climate change. NBER working paper no. 18704 Cai Y, Judd KL, Lontzek TS (2015a) The social cost of carbon with economic and climate risks. arXiv:1504.06909 [q-fin.EC] Cai Y, Judd KL, Lenton TM, Lontzek TS, Narita D (2015b) Environmental tipping points significantly affect the cost-benefit assessment of climate policies. PNAS 112(15):4606–4611 Cai Y, Judd KL, Lontzek TS (2016a) Numerical dynamic programming with error control: an application to climate policy. Mimeo, New York Cai Y, Lenton TM, Lontzek TS (2016b) Risk of multiple interacting tipping points should encourage rapid CO\(_2\) emission reduction. Nat Clim Change 6(5):520–525 Cook KH, Vizy EK (2008) Effects of 21st century climate change on the Amazon rainforest. J Clim 21:542–560 Crost B, Traeger C (2011) Risk and aversion in the integrated assessment of climate change. CUDARE working papers de Zeeuw A, Zemel A (2012) Regime shifts and uncertainty in pollution control. J Econ Dyn Control 36:939–950 Dietz S, Millner A, Heal G (2013) Scientific ambiguity and climate policy. Environ Resour Econ 55(1):21–46 Epstein LG, Zin SE (1989) Substitution, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: a theoretical framework. Econometrica 57(4):937–969 FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome FAO (2014) Contribution of the forestry sector to national economies, 1990–2011. Forest finance working paper FSFM/ACC/09 Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–581 Good P, Jones C, Lowe J, Betts R, Gedney N (2013) Comparing tropical forest projections from two generations of Hadley Centre earth system models, HadGEM2-ES and HadCM3LC. J Clim 26:495–511 Ha-Duong M, Treich N (2004) Risk aversion, intergenerational equity and climate change. Environ Resour Econ 28(2):195–207 Hirota M, Holmgren M, Van Nes EH, Scheffer M (2011) Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions. Science 334(6053):232–235 Keller K, Bolker BM, Bradford DF (2004) Uncertain climate thresholds and optimal economic growth. J Environ Econ Manag 48:723–741 Kriegler E, Hall JW, Dawson R, Schellnhuber HJ (2009) Imprecise probability assessment of tipping points in the climate system. PNAS 106:5041–5046 Kurz WA, Dymond CC, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Neilson ET, Carroll AL, Ebata T, Safranyik L (2008a) Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452:987–990 Kurz WA, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Dymond CC, Neilson ET (2008b) Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada’s forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain. PNAS 105(5):1551–1555 Lemoine D, Traeger C (2014) Watch your step: optional policy in a tipping climate. Am Econ J Econ Policy 6(1):137–166 Lenton TM, Held H, Kriegler E, Hall JW, Lucht W, Rahmstorf S, Schellnhuber HJ (2008) Tipping elements in the earth’s climate system. PNAS 105(6):1786–1793 Lontzek TS, Cai Y, Judd KL, Lenton TM (2015) Stochastic integrated assessment of climate tipping points calls for strict climate policy. Nat Clim Change 5(5):441–444 Lubowski RN, Rose SK (2013) The potential for REDD+: key economic modeling insights and issues. Rev Environ Econ Policy 7(1):67–90 Lucht W, Schaphoff S, Erbrecht T, Heyder U, Cramer W (2006) Terrestrial vegetation redistribution and carbon balance under climate change. Carbon Balance Manag 1:6 Margolis M, Naevdal E (2008) Safe minimum standards in dynamic resource problems: conditions for living on the edge of risk. Environ Resour Econ 40(3):401–423 Matthews HD, Gillett NP, Stott PA, Zickfeld K (2009) The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature 459(7248):829–832 Meinshausen M, Raper SCB, Wigley TML (2011) Emulating coupled atmosphere–ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6—part 1: model description and calibration. Atmos Chem Phys 11:1417–1456 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment, ecosystems and human well-being. Technical report, World Resources Institute Nordhaus WD (2008) A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven Polasky S, de Zeeuw A, Wagener F (2011) Optimal management with potential regime shifts. J Environ Econ Manag 62:229–240 Rammig A, Jupp T, Thonicke T, Tietjen B, Heinke J, Ostberg S, Lucht W, Cramer W, Cox P (2010) Estimating the risk of Amazonian forest dieback. New Pytol 187:694–706 Ren B, Polasky S (2014) The optimal management of renewable resources under the risk of potential regime shift. J Econ Dyn Control 40:195–212 Staver AC, Archibald S, Levin SA (2011) The global extent and determinants of savanna and forest as alternative biome states. Science 334(6053):230–232 Stern N (2013) The structure of economic modeling of the potential impact of climate change: grafting gross underestimation of risk onto already narrow science models. J Econ Lit 51(3):838–859 Weil P (1989) The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle. J Monet Econ 24(3):401–421 World Bank (2012) Turn down the heat: why a \(4^\circ \text{ C }\) warmer world must be avoided. World Bank, Washington Zemel A (2012) Precaution under mixed uncertainty: implications for environmental management. Resour Energy Econ 34:188–197