Stent implantation for May–Thurner syndrome with acute deep venous thrombosis: acute and long-term results from the ATOMIC (AcTive stenting for May–Thurner Iliac Compression syndrome) registry

Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics - Tập 34 - Trang 131-138 - 2018
Atsushi Funatsu1, Hitoshi Anzai2, Kota Komiyama3, Kuniomi Oi4, Hiroshi Araki5, Yasuhiro Tanabe6, Masashi Nakao7, Makoto Utsunomiya8, Atsushi Mizuno9, Michiaki Higashitani10, Shigeru Nakamura1
1Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
2Ota Memorial Hospital, Gunma, Japan
3Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
4Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizen’s Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
5Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
6St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
7Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
8Tokyo Rosai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
9St Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
10Tokyo Medical University, Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan

Tóm tắt

The outcomes of stent implantation in managing May–Thurner syndrome (MTS) are not well understood. To clarify the acute and long-term outcomes of stent implantation in patients with MTS having acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT), we retrospectively investigated consecutive 59 patients from 10 hospitals in Japan who were treated with stents for left iliac vein stenosis with acute DVT. Stents were considered successful if the stent was patent at discharge, which in turn was defined as patient success. The primary endpoint for the study was stent patency, and the secondary endpoint was recurrence of DVT and development of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) during follow-up. The patient success was achieved in 56 patients (95%). Clinical follow-up was conducted for 50 patients (89%) for a median duration of 40 months (range 8–165 months). Among them, 44 patients (79%) were followed up using imaging modalities. During this period, stent occlusion was revealed in four patients (9%), and one patient was successfully treated using balloon angioplasty. Primary and secondary patency rates were 84% at 19 months and 93% at 20 months, respectively. Recurrence of DVT was documented in 3 (8%) patients. PTS was evaluated from 36 patients. Three patients (8%) had PTS; however, none of the patients had severe PTS. This multicenter retrospective study of the use of stents for treating patients with MTS having acute DVT demonstrated good acute and long-term outcomes and long-term stent patency.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Okrent D, Messersmith R, Buckman J. Transcatheter fibrinolytic therapy and angioplasty for left iliofemoral venous thrombosis. JVIR. 1991;2:195–200. Mickley V, Schwagierek R, Rilinger N, Gorich J, Sunder-Plassmann L. Left iliac venous thrombosis caused by venous spur: treatment with thrombectomy and stent implantation. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28:492–7. O’Sullivan GJ, Semba CP, Bittner CA, Kee CA, Razavi MK, Sze DY, et al. Endovascular management of iliac vein compression (May–Thurner) syndrome. JVIR. 2000;11:823–36. Hurst DR, Forauer AR, Bloom JR, Greenfield LJ, Wakefield TW, Williams DM. Diagnosis and endovascular treatment of iliocaval compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:106–13. Raju S, Neglen P. High prevalence of nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions in chronic venous disease: a permissive role in pathogenicity. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:136–44. Hartung O, Benmiloud F, Barthelemy P, Dubuc M, Boufi M, Alimi YS. Late results of surgical venous thrombectomy with iliocaval stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:381–7. Mahnken AH, Thomson K, Haan M, O’Sullivan GJ. CIRSE Standards of Practice Guidelines on iliocaval stenting. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:889–97. Prandoni P, Villalta S, Bagatella P, Rossi L, Marchiori A, Piccioli A, et al. The clinical course of deep-vein thrombosis. Prospective long-term follow-up of 528 symptomatic patients. Haematologica. 1997;82(4):423–8. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson M, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials. A consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:2736–47. Matsuda A, Yamada N, Ogihara Y, Tsuji A, Ota S, Ishikura K, et al. Early and long-term outcomes of venous stent implantation for iliac venous stenosis after catheter-directed thrombosis for acute deep vein thrombosis. Circ J. 2014;78:1234–9. Funatsu A, Nakamura S. Stent implantation for iliac compression syndrome with acute deep venous thrombosis. Jpn Phlebol. 2012;23:283–93. Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR, Meissner MH, Cynamon J, Labropoulos N, Haughton SH. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry. Radiology. 1999;211:39–49. Srinivas BC, Patra S, Nagesh CM, Reddy B, Manjunath CN. Catheter-directed thrombolysis along with mechanical thromboaspiration versus anticoagulation alone in the management of lower limb deep venous thrombosis—a comparative study. Int J Angiol. 2014;23:247–54. Mizuno A, Anzai H, Utsunomiya M, Yajima J, Ohta H, Ando H, et al Real clinical practice of catheter therapy for deep venous thrombosis: periprocedural and 6-months outcomes from the EDO registry. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2015;30:251–9 Weinberg I, Kaufman J, Jaff MR. Inferior vena cava filters. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2013;6:539–47. Bashir R, Zack CJ, Zhao H, Comerota AJ, Bove AA. Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone to treat lower-extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1494–501. Vedantham S, Goldhaber SZ, Julian JA, Kahn SR, Jaff MR, Cohen DJ, et al. for the ATTRACT Trial Investigators. Pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2240–52. Haig Y, Enden T, Grøtta O, Kløw NE, Slagsvold CE, Ghanima W, et al. on hebalf of the CaVenT Study Group. Post-thrombotic syndrome after catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis (CaVenT): 5-year follow-up results of an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3:64–71.