Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants

Fuel Processing Technology - Tập 82 Số 2-3 - Trang 89-165 - 2003
John H. Pavlish1, E.A. Sondreal1, Michael D. Mann1, Edwin S. Olson1, Kevin C. Galbreath1, D.L. Laudal1, Steven A. Benson1
1Energy and Environmental Research Center, 15 North 23rd Street, PO Box 9018, Grand Forks, ND 58202-9018, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

U.S. EPA, A Study of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units: Final Report to Congress; EPA-453/R-98-004a; U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1998, Feb.

U.S. EPA, Mercury Study Report to Congress; EPA-452/R-97-003; U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1997, Dec.

National Research Council, 2000

Brown, 1999, Mercury measurement and its control: what we know, have learned, and need to further investigate, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 1, 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463906

Aposhian, 2000, Elemental, mercuric and methylmercury: biological interactions and dilemmas

Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction, CERHR: Mercury (5/16/02). http://cerhr.niehs.nih.gov/genpub/topics/mercury2-ccae.html (accessed August 16, 2002).

University of Rochester, Commercial Fish: Eat Up, Despite Low Levels of Mercury, http://www.rochester.edu/pr/releases/med/mercury.htm (accessed August 16, 2002).

Halsey, 1999, Perspective on the use of thimerosal-containing vaccines

McMillan, 2000, Mining existing data to assess mercury impacts

Levin, 2000, Assessment of source–receptor relationships for utility mercury emissions

Senior, 2000, Predicting the speciation of mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants

Schroeder, 1998, Atmospheric mercury—an overview, Atmos. Environ., 32, 809, 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00293-8

Grumet, 2000, Mercury emissions—control technologies: a northeast perspective

EPA, Regulatory Finding on the Emissions of Hazardous Air Pollutants from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units, Federal Register, 65 (245), AD-FRL-6919-6.

Foley, 2000, Science program being undertaken in North Dakota

Brown, 2000, Mercury emissions: EPA's perspective

Kuzmack, 2000, Presentation for the U.S. environmental protection agency on the panel on environmental policy

EPA, Fact Sheet—EPA to Regulate Mercury and Other Air Toxics Emissions from Coal and Oil-Fired Power Plants, 2000, Dec.

Johnson, 2001, Power plants to limit mercury, C&EN, 79, 10.1021/cen-v079n001.p018

Shea, 2000, The electric power industry and the mercury issue

EPA, EPA ICR No. 1858: Information Collection Request for Electric Utility Steam Generating Unit Mercury Emissions Information Collection Effort, 1999.

Kilgroe, 2000, EPA mercury emission control study: preliminary results

Chu, 2000, Total and speciated mercury emissions from U.S. coal-fired power plants

Pavlish, 1998, A comparison of air toxic metal control technologies

Pavlish, 1998, An economic basis for developing mercury control strategies

Lindqvist, 1985, Tellus, 37B, 136, 10.1111/j.1600-0889.1985.tb00062.x

Slemr, 1985, J. Atmos. Chem., 3, 407, 10.1007/BF00053870

Lindqvist, 1991, Water Air Soil Pollut., 55, 1, 10.1007/BF00542429

Hall, 1995, Water Air Soil Pollut., 80, 301, 10.1007/BF01189680

Dunham, 2001, A multi-pollutant approach to controlling air emissions from the power generation sector

Weiss, 2001, Examining an integrated emission reduction strategy for the electric generation sector

Hutzler, 2001, Analysis of strategies for reducing multiple emissions from power plants

Krolewksi, 2001, Synergies among NOx, SO2, and mercury controls

Bailey, 2000, Presentation for the Edison Electric Institute on the panel on environmental policy

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clear Skies Legislation Introduced in Congress Proposal Will Improve Air Quality, Prevent Premature Deaths, Illnesses, EPA Press Release, July 29, 2002.

Stadler, 2000, Presentation for the National Wildlife Federation on the Panel on Environmental Policy

Goffman, 2000, Presentation for the Environmental Defense Fund on the Panel on Environmental Policy

Robinson, 1966, 204

Slavin, 1978, 193

Price, 1979, 392

Ure, 1975, Anal. Chim. Acta, 76, 1, 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)81980-2

Morita, 1995, Spectrochim. Acta, 50B, 69, 10.1016/0584-8547(94)00116-D

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Method 29—Determination of Metals Emissions from Stationary Sources, U.S. EPA, Emission Measurement Technical Information Center, TM-029, April 25, 1996.

SIS, Luftundersöknigar–Utsläpp till luft–Bestämning av totalkvicksilverhalten med flamlös atomabsorptionsmetod (Air quality–stationary source emissions–determination of the total mass concentration of mercury–flameless atomic absorption methods), SS 02 84 23, Stockholm, Sweden, Standardiseringskommissionen i Sverige, 1991, Dec., p. 11 (in Swedish).

American Public Health Association, 1980

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1983

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1988

J.H. Pavlish, et al., Center for Air Toxic Metals Final Technical Report, Energy and Environmental Research Center: Grand Forks, North Dakota, Vol. III, 2000, Sept.

EPRI, Evaluation of Methods for Analysis of Mercury and Chlorine in Coal, EPRI No. 1000287, 2000.

Olmez, 1993

Olmez, 1995

Blanchard, 1997, Determination of mercury in coal using radiochemical methods, Analysis, 122, 1261

Dams, 1992, Pure Appl. Chem., 64, 991, 10.1351/pac199264070991

D.L. Laudal, K.C. Galbreath, M.K. Heidt, A state-of-the-art review of flue gas mercury speciation methods, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, Nov. 1996 and Oct. 1997, EPRI Report No. TR-107080.

D.L. Laudal, M.K. Heidt, B.R. Nott, T.D. Brown, Evaluation of Flue Gas Mercury Speciation Methods, Electric Power Research Institute/U.S. Department of Energy Final Report, December 1997, EPRI TR-108988.

Laudal, 1997, Mercury speciation methods for utility flue gas, Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem., 358, 397, 10.1007/s002160050436

D.L. Laudal, Field Validation of the Ontario Hydro Mercury Speciation Sampling Method at Site E-29, Electric Power Research Institute/U.S. Department of Energy Final Report; 1999, Jan.

Prestbo, 2000, Investigation of the fate of mercury in a coal combustion plume using a static plume dilution chamber

Laudal, 2000, State-of-the-art of mercury continuous emission monitors for coal-fired systems

Roberson, 2001, Status of mercury CEM systems

Carey, 1998, Factors affecting mercury control in utility flue gas using activated carbon, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 48, 1166, 10.1080/10473289.1998.10463753

Corns, 2000, The development of a continuous emission monitor for mercury speciation and its utilization in mercury removal studies

Kelly, 2000, Evaluation of Hg CEM measurement performance through EPA's Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) program

Olson, 2000, Trapping and identification of oxidized mercury species in flue gas, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., 45, 560

Thompson, 1998, Speciating mercuric chloride in combustion flue gas using cryogenic trapping

Laumb, 2000, Information collection request for mercury: correlation analysis of coal and power plant data

EPRI, An Assessment of Mercury Emissions from U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants, EPRI: Palo Alto, CA, 2000; 1000608.

Holmes, 1997, Control of mercury in conventional flue gas emissions control systems

G.T. Amrhein, M.J. Holmes, R.T. Bailey, G.A. Kudlac, W. Downs, D.A. Madden, Advanced Emissions Control Development Program, Phase III—Approved Final Report, DOE Contract DE-FC22-94PC94251, 1999, July.

M. Hocquel, et al., Verhalten von Quecksilberemissionen bei der Mitverbrennung von Klärschlämmen in Kohlestaubfeuerungen, Wege des Abfalls, VDI Berichte 1540, ISBN 3-18-091540-4.

D. Laudal, Pilot-Scale Evaluation of the Impact of Selective Catalytic Reduction for NO, on Mercury Speciation, Report for EPRI, U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ontario Power Generation, EPRI: Palo Alto, CA, 2000, 1000755.

Swaine, 1990

Finkelman, 1994, Modes of occurrence of potentially hazardous elements in coal: levels of confidence, Fuel Process. Technol., 39, 21, 10.1016/0378-3820(94)90169-4

Huggins, 1996, Application of XAFS spectroscopy to coal geochemistry, 133

Zygarlicke, 2000, Coal combustion mercury transformations

Alvin, 1977

M.A. Alvin, Final Report No. Pb 82-240219, EPA Contract No. 600/7-82-050, Westinghouse Research and Development Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, 1982, p. 448.

P.-O. Moberg, M. Westermark, B. Noläng, Technical Report No. KHM TR 28, The Wedish State Power Board, Vällingby, Sweden, 1982.

Mojtahedi, 1989, Combust. Sci. Technol., 63, 209, 10.1080/00102208908947128

SRI International, Final report to the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC21-86MC23261, Report No. DE89 011687, Morgantown Energy Technology Center: Morgantown, West Virginia, 1989.

K. Larjava, PhD Dissertation, Helsinki University, 1993, May.

Linak, 1994, Fuel Process. Technol., 39, 173, 10.1016/0378-3820(94)90179-1

Frandsen, 1994, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 20, 115, 10.1016/0360-1285(94)90007-8

Rizeq, 1994, Fuel Process. Technol., 39, 219, 10.1016/0378-3820(94)90181-3

Linak, 1993, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 19, 145, 10.1016/0360-1285(93)90014-6

Wu, 1993, Combust. Flame, 93, 31, 10.1016/0010-2180(93)90082-E

Verhulst, 1996, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 50, 10.1021/es940780+

Sliger, 2000, Development of an elementary homogeneous mercury oxidation mechanism

Lee, 1998, 221

Gaspar, 1997, 661

Hall, 1991, Chemical reactions of mercury in combustion flue gases, Water Air Soil Pollut., 56, 3, 10.1007/BF00342256

Galbreath, 1998

Hall, 1990, Mercury chemistry in simulated flue gases related to waste incineration conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 108, 10.1021/es00071a013

Galbreath, 2000, Mercury transformations in coal combustion flue gas, Fuel Process. Technol., 65/66, 289, 10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00102-2

Wu, 1996

Ghorishi, 1999

T.R. Carey, R.C. Skarupa, O.W. Hargrove Jr., Enhanced Control of Mercury and Other HAPs by Innovative Modifications to Wet FGD Processes, Phase I Report for the U.S. Department of Energy, Contract DE-AC22-95PC95260, Aug. 28, 1998.

Lee, 2000

Zhuang, 2000

Miller, 1998

H.L. Hitchcock, MS Thesis, University of North Dakota, 1996, Dec, 83 pp.

Hall, 1995, The gas phase oxidation of elemental mercury by Ozone, Water Air Soil Pollut., 80, 301, 10.1007/BF01189680

Chang-Yu, 1996, Mercury capture by aerosol transformation in combustion environments

Fontijn, 1997, Reaction kinetics of toxic metals, 86

Mamani-Paco, 2000, Bench-scale examination of mercury oxidation under non-isothermal conditions

Senior, 2000, Gas-phase transformations of mercury in coal-fired power plants, Fuel Process. Technol., 63, 197, 10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00097-1

Niksa, 2001, Kinetic modeling of homogeneous mercury oxidation: the importance of NO and H2O in predicting oxidation in coal-derived systems, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 3701, 10.1021/es010728v

Shao, 1993, Behavior of chlorine and sulfur during coal combustion, Vol. 1, 656

Pan, 1994, Process for converting hydrogen chloride to chlorine, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33, 2996, 10.1021/ie00036a014

S.J. Miller, S.R. Ness, G.F. Weber, T.A. Erickson, D.J. Hassett, S.B. Hawthorne, K.A. Katrinak, P.K.K. Louie, A Comprehensive Assessment of Toxic Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants: Phase I Results from the U.S. Department of Energy Study, Final Report on Contract DE-FC21-93MC30097, Energy and Environmental Research Center: Grand Forks, ND, 1996, Sept.

Sun, 2000, The effect of coal combustion flue gas components on low-level chlorine speciation using EPA method 26A, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 50, 936, 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464142

Widmer, 2000, Thermochemical study of mercury oxidation in utility boiler flue gases

Butz, 2000, Options for mercury removal from coal fired flue gas streams: pilot-scale research on activated carbon, alternative and regenerable sorbents

Butz, 2000, Use of fly ash fractions from western coals for mercury removal from flue gas streams

Gibb, 2000, The fate of coal mercury during combustion, Fuel Process. Technol., 65–66, 365, 10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00104-6

G.E. Dunham, S.J. Miller, D.L. Laudal, Investigation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control in Coal-Fired Boilers, Final Report Prepared for EPRI and DOE, Energy and Environmental Research Center: Grand Forks, ND, 1998, Sept.

Hassett, 1999, Mercury capture on coal combustion fly ash, Fuel, 78, 243, 10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00150-1

Zhou, 2001, Mercury transport during coal combustion and pyrolysis, 419

Ghorishi, 1998, Sorption of mercury species by activated carbons and calcium-based sorbents: effect of temperature, mercury concentration, and acid gases, Waste Manage. Res., 16, 582, 10.1177/0734242X9801600609

Butz, 1999, Coal fly ash as a sorbent for mercury, 167

Huggins, 2000, Investigation of mercury adsorption on cherokee fly-ash using XAFS spectroscopy

Hower, 2000, Studies of mercury distribution in fly ash at a Kentucky power plant

Hower, 2000, Mercury capture by distinct fly ash carbon forms, Energy Fuels, 14, 224, 10.1021/ef990192n

Senior, 1998, Interactions between vapor-phase mercury and coal fly ash under simulated utility power plant flue gas conditions

Wu, 2000, Interactions between vapor-phase mercury compounds and coal char in synthetic flue gas, Fuel Process. Technol., 63, 93, 10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00091-0

Otanik, 1988, Removal of mercury vapor from air with sulfur-impregnated adsorbents, Environ. Sci. Technol., 22, 708, 10.1021/es00171a015

Vidic, 2000, Impregnated activated carbons for elemental mercury adsorption

Dunham, 1996, Evaluation of activated carbon for control of mercury from coal fired boilers

Krishnan, 1994, Sorption of elemental mercury by activated carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 1506, 10.1021/es00057a020

Vidic, 1996, Uptake of elemental mercury vapors by activated carbons, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 46, 241, 10.1080/10473289.1996.10467458

Vidic, 1999, Development of impregnated sorbents for the control of elemental mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants

Hsi, 2000, Preparation of sulfur impregnated activated carbon fibers for removal of mercury vapor from simulated coal combustion flue gases

Bell, 2000, Comparison of mercury uptake by six sorbents as measured in packed bed and sorbent injection tests

Huggins, 1999, Identification of mercury species in unburned carbon from pulverized coal combustion

Laumb, 2001, Characterization of coal-derived mercury sorbents, 179

Miller, 2000, Flue gas effects on a carbon-based sorbent, Fuel Process. Technol., 65–66, 343, 10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00103-4

Dunham, 2000, Impact of flue gas constituents on carbon sorbents

Olson, 1999, Identification of the breakthrough oxidized mercury species from sorbents in flue gas, 121

Ghorishi, 2000, Role of surface functional groups in the capture of elemental mercury and mercuric chloride by activated carbons

Li, 2000, Effect of moisture on adsorption of elemental mercury by activated carbons

Zygarlicke, 2000, Coal combustion mercury transformations and speciation

Ghorishi, 1999, Mercury speciation in combustion systems: studies with simulated flue gases and model fly ashes

Lee, 2000, Speciation of mercury in the presence of coal and waste combustion fly ashes

Gullett, 2000, Mercury chloride capture by alkaline sorbents

E.S. Olson, Personal communication, Energy and Environmental Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, 2001, June 27.

Zhuang, 2000, Kinetic study of adsorption and transformation of mercury on fly ash particles in an entrained flow reactor

Lee, 1999, Kinetics of heterogeneous mercury reactions with sorbent particles: in situ capture methodologies

Rodriguez, 2000, Influence of SO2 particles on mercury removal using in situ generated TiO2 nanosize particles activated by UV irradiation

T.R. Carey, R.C. Skarupa, O.W. Hargrove Jr., Enhanced Control of Mercury and Other HAPs by Innovative Modification to Wet FGD Processes, Phase I Report for U.S. Department of Energy Agreement No. DE-AC22-95PC95260, 1998, Aug. 28.

Galbreath, 2001, Effects of NOx and AlphaFe2O3 on Mercury Transformations in a 7-kW coal combustion system

K.C. Galbreath, C.J. Zygarlicke, D.L. Toman, J.E. Tibbetts, R.L. Schulz, G.E. Dunham, Effects of NOx, α-Fe2O3, and γ-Fe2O3 on Mercury Transformations in a 7-kW Coal Combustion System, Fuel Process. Technol., in review.

Galbreath, 1999, Mercury–Flue Gas–Fly ash interactions, 141

Graham, 1998, Inorganic aerosols and their role in catalyzing sulfuric acid production in furnaces, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 48, 106, 10.1080/10473289.1998.10463662

R.R. Brintnell, Activated Carbon Injection for Mercury Control in Coal-Fired Boilers, MS Thesis, University of North Dakota, Department of Chemical Engineering, 2000, May.

Rostam-Abadi, 1997, Novel vapor phase mercury sorbents

Flora, 1998, Modeling powdered activated carbon injection for the uptake of elemental mercury vapors, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 48, 1051, 10.1080/10473289.1998.10463763

Chen, 1996, Mercury removal from combustion flue gas by activated carbon injection: mass transfer effects, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., 41, 442

Meserole, 2000, Estimated the costs of electric utility mercury control using sorbent injection

Miller, 1994

Serre, 2000, Elemental Mercury Capture by Activated Carbon in a Flow Reactor

Krishnan, 1997, Mercury control in municipal waste combustors and coal-fired utilities, Environ. Prog., 16, 10.1002/ep.3300160120

Pavlish, 2001, Mercury control options for power plants burning western subbituminous coals

Olson, 2000, Catalytic effects of carbon sorbents for mercury capture, J. Hazard. Mater., 74, 61, 10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00199-5

Sinha, 1972, Carbon, 10, 754, 10.1016/0008-6223(72)90085-1

Chang, 2000, The development of cost effective mercury control sorption processes

Environmental News Network, Reducing Mercury Pollutants from Coal Burning Plants, ENN Home Page, June 26, 2001, http://www.enn.com (accessed June 2001).

Hargis, 2001, Pilot-scale research at NETL on sorbent injection for mercury control, 469

Hargis, 2000, Sorbent injection for mercury removal in a pilot-scale coal combustion unit

Hargis, 2000, Mercury control by injection of activated carbon

Renninger, 2002, NETL's mercury program

Durham, 2002, Full scale demonstration of mercury control on boilers burning bituminous and subbituminous coals

Richardson, 2000, Enhanced control of mercury by wet FGD systems

Blythe, 1999, Enhanced control of mercury by wet flue gas desulfurization systems

Kudlac, 2000, Enhanced mercury control for coal-fired boilers

Madden, 1998, Limestone injection: mercury control for unscrubbed coal-fired systems

Livengood, 1995, Development of mercury control techniques for utility boilers

Mendelsohn, 1999, A new method for oxidation of gaseous, elemental mercury

Morency, 2000, Laboratory duct injection of a zeolite-based mercury sorbent

Granite, 2000, Photochemical removal of mercury from flue gas

McLarnon, 2000, Electro-catalytic oxidation technology applied to mercury and trace elements removal from flue gas

Carey, 1997, Factors affecting mercury control in utility flue gas using sorbent injection

Miller, 1999, Controlling mechanisms that determine mercury sorbent effectiveness

Liu, 1998, Optimization of sulfur impregnation protocol for fixed-bed application of activated carbon-based sorbents for gas-phase mercury removal, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 531, 10.1021/es970630+

Olson, 2000, Novel catalytic carbons for mercury sorption in air

Sinha, 1972, Carbon, 10, 754, 10.1016/0008-6223(72)90085-1

Olson, 1998, Development of catalytic carbons for mercury sorption, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., 43, 867

Hargrove, 1996, Enhanced control of mercury by innovative modifications to wet FGD processes

E.A. Sondreal, S.A. Benson, J.H. Pavlish, K.C. Galbreath, C.J. Zygarlicke, J.S. Thompson, D.P. McCollor, C.R. Crocker, C.M. Lillemoen, M.D. Mann, R.R. Jensen, G.F. Weber, Center for Air Toxic Metals Final Technical Report Volume 3, Final Technical Report for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Assistant Agreement R824854, Energy and Environmental Research Center: Grand Forks, ND, 2000, Sept.

DeVito, 1999, Flue gas Hg measurements from coal-fired boilers equipped with wet scrubbers

DeVito, 2000, The effect of low-NOx burner operation on mercury emissions, speciation, and removal at a coal-fired boiler equipped with wet FGD

D.L. Laudal, M.D. Kurz, Mercury Formation and Fate—Volume 1: Mercury Speciation Sampling at Minnkota Power Cooperative's Milton R. Young Station, Report for U.S. Department of Energy Agreement No. DE-FC21-93MC30098, Energy and Environmental Research Center: Grand Forks, ND, 1999, Jan.

D.J. Hassett, L.V. Heebink, Environmental Evaluation for Utilization of Ash in Soil Stabilization, Final Report for U.S. Department of Energy, Energy and Environmental Research Center: Grand Forks, North Dakota, 2002.

Keating, 1999, The fate of mercury on coal-fired power plants and combustion wastes, 494

Carlson, 1993, Environmental impacts of coal combustion residues, J. Environ. Qual., 22, 227, 10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200020002x

EPRI, Inorganic and Organic Constituents in Fossil Fuel Combustion Residue, Vol. 1: A Critical Review, EPRI Report EA-5176, Project 2485-8, 1987, Aug.

D.J. Hassett, Evaluation of Leaching Potential of Solid Coal Combustion Wastes, Final Report for Indiana Coal Council, Energy and Environmental Research Center: Grand Forks, North Dakota, 1991, Dec.

D.F. Pflughoeft-Hassett, B.A. Dockter, K.E. Eylands, D.J. Hassett, Survey and Demonstration of Utilization Potential of North Dakota Lignite Ash Resources, Final Report for the Industrial Commission of North Dakota; Energy and Environmental Research Center: Grand Forks, ND, 1996, April, 96-EERC-04-01.

Hassett, 1999, Mercury release from coal combustion by-products to the environment, 485

Zhenglong, 1997, Mercury distribution in fly ash components

J.H. Pavlish, T.R. Gerlach, C.J. Zygarlicke, D.F. Pflughoeft-Hassett, Mitigation of Air Toxics from Lignite Generation Facilities, Final Report, Energy and Environmental Research Center: Grand Forks, ND, 1995, Oct.

EPA, Report to Congress—Wastes from the Combustion of Fossil Fuels: Vol. 2—Methods, Findings, and Recommendations; EPA 530-R-99-010; EPA/Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC, 1999.

Hassett, 1997, Partitioning of trace elements during the air oxidation of scrubber sludge

Heebink, 2001

Carey, 1999, Stability of mercury captured on sorbent surfaces

Center for Clean Air Policy, Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants, Science, Technology and Policy Options, 1998, Nov.

R.M. Davidson, Modes of Occurrence of Trace Elements in Coal, IEA Coal Research, The Clean Coal Center, CCC/36, London, 2000.

Akers, 1996, Coal cleaning controls HAP emissions, Power Eng., 33

Akers, 1994, Role of coal cleaning in control of air toxics, Fuel Process. Technol., 39, 73, 10.1016/0378-3820(94)90173-2

Querol, 1995, Trace elements in coal and their behavior during combustion in a large power station, Fuel, 74, 331, 10.1016/0016-2361(95)93464-O

Huffman, 1994, Speciation of arsenic and chromium in coal and combustion ash by XAFS spectroscopy, Fuel Process. Technol., 39, 47, 10.1016/0378-3820(94)90171-6

Sondreal, 2000, Status of research on air quality: mercury, trace elements, and particulate matter, Fuel Process. Technol., 65–66, 5, 10.1016/S0378-3820(00)00083-7

Jacobsen, 1992, The role of coal preparation in the precombustion control of hazardous air pollutants, 412

Norton, 1989, Trace element removal during physical and chemical coal cleaning, Coal Prep., 7, 55, 10.1080/07349348908960542

Finkelman, 1979, Modes of occurrence of selected trace elements in several Appalachian coals, Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., 23–24, 6

Luttrell, 2000, An evaluation of coal preparation technologies for controlling trace element emissions, Fuel Process. Technol., 65–66, 407, 10.1016/S0378-3820(99)00107-1

Galbreath, 2000, Trace element partitioning and transformations during combustion of bituminous and subbituminous U.S. coals in a 7-kW combustion system, Energy Fuels, 14, 1265, 10.1021/ef000105n

C. Neme, Electric Utilities and Long-Range Transport of Mercury and Other Toxic Air Pollutants, Center for Clean Air Policy: Washington, DC, 1991, Nov.

Smit, 1996, Reduction of toxic trace elements in coal by advanced coal cleaning, 879

D.D. Ferris, et al., Engineering Development of Advanced Physical Fine Coal Cleaning Technologies—Froth Flotation, ICF Kaiser Engineers Final Report for U.S. Department of Energy Agreement No. DE-AC22-88PC88881; 1992, Dec.

Timpe, 2001, Organic sulfur and HAP removal from coal using hydrothermal treatment, Fuel Process. Technol., 1470

Akers, 1998, Coal cleaning for HAP control: cost and performance

U.S. EPA, Performance and Cost of Mercury Emission Control Technology Applications on Electric Utility Boilers, EPA-600/R-00-083, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, 2000, Sept.

J.D. Kilgroe, R.K. Srivastava, Technical Memorandum: Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Utility Boilers, U.S. EPA, 2000, Sept.

K.R. Jayaraman, J.M. Haydel, B.N. Venkatesh, Memorandum: Mercury Control Cost Calculations, 2000, Sept.

Environmental News Network, Reducing Mercury Pollutants from Coal Burning Plants, 2001, June 26.