State-of-the-Art Survey of Quantum Cryptography
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Shor PW (1994) Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. In: Proceeding of $$35^{th}$$ annual symposium on the foundations of computer science, 20–22 Nov. NM, USA, Santa Fe, pp 124–134
Shor PW (1997) Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM J Comput 26:1484–1509
Grover LK (1996) A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In: Proceedings of the $$28^{th}$$ annual symposium on theory of computation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, May 22–24, pp 212–219
Alleaume R, Branciard C, Bouda J, Debuisschert T, Dianati M, Gisin N, Godfrey M, Grangier P, Langer T, Lutkenhaus N, Monyk C, Painchault P, Peev M, Poppe A, Pornin T, Rarity J, Renner R, Ribordy G, Riguidel M, Salvail L, Shields A, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A (2014) Using quantum key distribution for cryptographic purposes: a survey. Theor Comput Sci 560:62–81
Giampouris D (2016) Short review on quantum key distribution protocols. In: Vlamos P (ed) GeNeDis computational biology and bioinformatics, advances in experimental medicine and biology, vol 988. Springer, Cham, pp 149–157
Diamanti E, Lo HK, Qi B, Yuan Z (2016) Practical challenges in quantum key distribution. npj Quantum Inf 2:16025
Long GL (2017) Quantum secure direct communication: principles, current status, perspectives. In: 2017 IEEE 85th vehicular technology conference (VTC 2017 Spring) 4–7 June 2017 Sydney, Australia, pp 1–5
Zhou T, Shen J, Li X, Wang C, Shen J (2018) Quantum cryptography for the future internet and the security analysis. Security and Communications Networks Article id 8214619, pp 1–7
Heisenberg W (1927) Uber Den Anschaulichen Inhalt Der Quantentheoretischen Kinematik Und Mechanik. Zeitschrift Fur Physik (in German) 43(3–4):172–198
Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys Rev 47:777–780
Vernam GS (2019) Secret signaling system, US Patent 1310719A, July 22, 1919. https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/5d/ae/f5/1256151a84830e/US1310719.pdf
Schumacher B, Westmoreland MD (2006) Quantum mutual information and the one-time pad. Phys Rev A 74:042305
Brandao FGSL, Oppenheim J (2012) The quantum one-time pad in the presence of an eavesdropper. Phys Rev Lett 108(4):040504
Bennett CH, Brassard G, Robert JM (1988) Privacy amplification by public discussion. SIAM J Comput 17(2):210–229
Griffet C (2019) From discrete-to continuous-variable protocols for quantum key distribution, Master Thesis, Universite Libre De Bruxelles
Reid MD (2000) Quantum cryptography with a predetermined key, using continuous variable Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen correlations. Phys Rev A 62(6):062308-1–062308-6
Garcia-Patron R, Cerf NJ (2009) Continuous-variable quantum key distribution protocols over noisy channels. Phys Rev Lett 102:130501-1–130501-4
Cerf NJ, Grangier P (2007) From quantum cloning to quantum key distribution with continuous variables: a review (Invited). J Opt Soc Am 24(2):324–334
Cerf NJ, Levy M, Assche GV (2001) Quantum distribution of gaussian keys using squeezed states. Phys Rev A 63:052311
Grosshans F, Grangier P (2002) Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states. Phys Rev Lett 88:057902
Grosshans F, Assche GV, Wenger J, Brouri R, Cerf NJ, Grangier P (2003) Quantum key distribution using gaussian-modulated coherent states. Nature 421:238–241
Lodewyck J, Debuisschert T, Tualle-Brouri R, Grangier P (2005) Controlling excess noise in fiber optics continuous variables quantum key distribution. Phys Rev A 72:050303
Weedbrook C, Lance AM, Bowen WP, Symul T, Ralph TC, Lam PK (2004) Quantum cryptography without switching. Phys Rev Lett 93(17):170504-1–170504-4
Leverrier A, Grangier P (2011) Continuous-variable quantum key distribution protocols with a discrete modulation. arXiv:1002.4083
Papanastasiou P, Pirandola S (2020) Continuous-variable quantum cryptography with discrete alphabets: composable security under collective gaussian attacks, pp 1–6. arXiv:1912.11418
Andersen UL, Neergaard-Nielsen JS, Loock P, Furusawa A (2015) Hybrid discrete-and continuous-variable quantum information. Nat Phys 11:713–719
Sanchez RG (2007) Quantum information with optical continuous variables: from Bell tests to key distribution, PhD Thesis, The Center for Quantum Information and Communication (QuIC) of the University of Bruxelles (ULB)
Pirandola S (2008) Symmetric collective attacks for the eavesdropping of symmetric quantum key distribution. Int J Quantum Inf 6:765–771
Huttner B, Imoto N, Gisin N, Mor T (1995) Quantum cryptography with coherent states. Phys Rev A 51(3):1863–1869
Lutkenhaus N (2000) Security against individual attacks for realistic quantum key distribution. Phys Rev A 61:052304-1–052304-10
Liu WT, Sun SH, Liang LM, Yuan JM (2011) Proof-of-principle experiment of a modifed photon-number-splitting attack against quantum key distribution. Phys Rev A 83:042326-1–042326-5
Fuchs CA, Gisin N, Griffiths RB, Niu CS, Peres A (1997) Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography. I. Information bound and optimal strategy. Phys Rev A 56(2):1163–1172
Vakhitov A, Makarov V, Hjelme DR (2001) Large pulse attack as a method of conventional optical eavesdropping in quantum cryptography. J Mod Phys 48(13):2023–2038
Dehmani M, Ez-Zahraouy H, Benyoussef A (2010) Quantum cryptography with several cloning attacks. J Comput Sci 6(7):684–688
Gisin N, Fasel S, Kraus B, Zbinden H, Ribordy G (2006) Trojan-horse attacks on quantum-key-distribution-systems. Phys Rev A 73:022320-1–022320-6
Kronberg DA, Molotkov SN (2010) Quantum scheme for an optimal attack on quantum key distribution protocol BB84. Bull Russ Acad Sci Phys 74(7):912–918
Jain N, Anisimova E, Khan I, Makarov V, Marquardt C, Leuchs G (2014) Trojan-horse attacks threaten the security of practical quantum cryptography. New J Phys 16:123030
Fei YY, Meng XD, Gao M, Wang H, Ma Z (2018) Quantum man-in-the-middle attack on the calibration process of quantum key distribution. Sci Rep 8:1–10
Lamas-Linares A, Kurtsiefer C (2007) Breaking a quantum key distribution system through a timing side channel. Opt Express 15(15):9388–9393
Qi B, Fung CHF, Lo HK, Ma X (2007) Time-shift attack in practical quantum cryptosystems. Quantum Inf Comput 7(1):73–82
Sun SH, Xu F, Jiang MS, Ma XC, Lo HK, Liang LM (2015) Effect of source tampering in the security of quantum cryptography. Phys Rev A 92(2):022304
Fung CHF, Qi B, Tamaki K, Lo HK (2007) Phase-remapping attack in practical quantum-key-distribution systems. Phys Rev A 75(3):032314-1–032314-12
Xu F, Qi B, Lo HK (2010) Experimental demonstration of phase-remapping attack in a practical quantum key distribution system. New J Phys 12:113026
Zhao Y, Fung CHF, Qi B, Chen C, Lo HK (2008) Quantum hacking: experimental demonstration of time-shift attack against practical quantum-key-distribution systems. Phys Rev A 78:042333-1–042333-5
Wei K, Zhang W, Tang YL, You L, Xu F (2019) Implementation security of quantum key distribution due to polarization-dependent efficiency mismatch. Phys Rev A 100(2):022325
Boyer M, Liss R, Mor T (2020) Composable security against collective attacks of a modified BB4 QKD protocol with information only in one basis. Theor Comput Sci 801:96–109
Jain N, Stiller B, Khan I, Elser D, Marquardt C, Leuchs G (2016) Attacks on practical quantum key distribution systems (and how to prevent them). Contemp Phys 57(3):366–387
Bennett CH, Brassard G (1984) Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. In: International conference on computers, systems and signal processing Bangalore, India, Dec 10–12 1984, pp 175–179
Bennett CH, Brassard G (2014) Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. Theor Comput Sci 560:7–11
Chuang I, Oliver W, Shor P (2019) Introduction to quantum computing online course. https://learn-xpro.mit.edu/quantum-computing. Accessed 24 May 2020
Shor PW, Preskill J (2000) Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol. Phys Rev Lett 85(2):441–444
Biham E, Boyer M, Boykin PO, Mor T, Roychowdhury V (2006) A proof of the security of quantum key distribution. J Cryptol 19(4):381–439
Scarani V, Kurtsiefer C (2014) The black paper of quantum cryptography: real implementation problems. Theor Comput Sci 560:27–32
Goldenberg L, Vaidman L (1995) Quantum cryptography based on orthogonal states. Phys Rev Lett 75:1239–1243
Goldenberg L, Vaidman L (1996) Reply to comment: Quantum cryptography with orthogonal states, pp 1–3. arXiv:quant-ph/9604029.pdf
Dan L, Chang-xing P, Dong-xiao Q, Bao-bin H, Nan Z (2009) A new attack strategy for BB84 protocol based on Breidbart basis, ChinaCom2009-network and information security symposium, 26th–27th Aug 2009, Xian, China, vol 4, pp 1–3
Yong W, Huadeng W, Zhaohong L, Jinxiang H (2009) Man-in-the-middle attack on BB84 protocol and its defence. In: $$2^{nd}$$ IEEE international conference on computer science and information technology (CSIT) Aug 8–11, Beijing, China, vol 2, pp 438–439
An H, Liu D, Yu T (2014) A solution for beam splitter attack on BB84 protocol. In: Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on computer, communications and information technology, advances in intelligent systems research. Atlantis Press
Garcia-Patron R, Wong FNC, Shapiro JH (2010) Optimal individual attack on BB84 quantum key distribution using single- photon two-qubit quantum logic. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 7702:77020C-1–77020C-10
Boyer B, Liss R, Mor T (2017) Security against collective attacks of a modified BB84 QKD protocol with information only in one basis. In: Proceedings of the $$2^{nd}$$ international conference on complexity, future information systems and risk (COMPLEXIS 2017), vol 2, pp 23–29
Jiang MS, Sun SH, Li CY, Liang LM (2014) Frequency shift attack on plug-and-play quantum key distribution systems. J Mod Opt 61(2):147–153
Bennett CH, Brassard G, Mermin ND (1992) Quantum cryptography without Bell’s theorem. Phys Rev Lett 68:557–559
Waks E, Zeevi A, Yamamoto Y (2002) Security of quantum key distribution with entangled photons against individual attacks. Phys Rev A 65:052310-1–052310-16
Adenier G, Ohya M, Watanabe N, Basieva I, Khrennikov AY (2012) Double blinding-attack on entanglement-based quantum key distribution protocols. AIP Conf Proc 1424:9–16
Bennett CH (1992) Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. Phys Rev Lett 68:3121–3124
Yonofsky NS, Mannucci MA (2008) Quantum computing for computer scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tamaki K, Koashi M, Imoto N (2003) Unconditionally secure key distribution based on two nonorthogonal states. Phys Rev Lett 90:167904
Tamaki K, Lukenhaus N (2004) Unconditional security of the Bennett 1992 quantum key-distribution protocol over a lossy and noisy channel. Phys Rev A 69:032316
Koashi M (2004) Unconditional security of coherent-state quantum key distribution with a strong phase-reference pulse. Phys Rev Lett 93:120501
Kuppam S (2018) Modelling and analysis of quantum key distribution protocols, BB84 and B92. In: Communicating quantum processes (CQP) language and analysing in PRISM, pp 1–12. arxiv.org/pdf/1612.03706.pdf
Phoenix SJD, Barnett SM, Chefles A (2000) Three-state quantum cryptography. J Mod Opt 47(2–3):507–516
Senekane M, Mafu M, Petruccione F (2015) Six-state symmetric quantum key distribution protocol. J Quantum Inf Sci 5:33–40
Hensen B, Kalb N, Blok MS, Dreau AE, Reiserer A, Vermeulen RFL, Schouten RN, Markham M, Twitchen DJ, Goodenough K, Elkouss D, Wehner S, Taminiau TH, Hanson R (2016) Loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond: second experiment and additional analysis. Sci Rep 6(30289):1–11
Ilic N (2007) The Ekert protocol. J Phys 334:1–4
Li Q, Li Z, Chan WH, Zhang S, Liu C (2018) Blind quantum computation with identity authentication. Phys Lett A 382(14):938–941
Inamori H, Rallan L, Vedral V (2001) Security of EPR-based quantum cryptography against incoherent symmetric attacks. J Phys A: Math Gen 34(35):6913
Ling A, Peloso M, Marcikic I, Lamas-Linares A, Kurtsiefer C (2008) Experimental E91 quantum key distribution. In: Proceedings of advanced optical concepts in quantum computing, memory, and communication. Integrated Optoelectronic Devices, San Jose, California, USA, p 6903
Acin A, Massar S, Pironio S (2006) Efficient quantum key distribution secure against no-signalling eavesdroppers. New J Phys 8(126):1–11
Honjo T, Nam SW, Takesue H, Zhang Q, Kamada H, Nishida Y, Tadanaga O, Asobe M, Baek B, Hadfield R, Miki S, Fujiwara M, Sasaki M, Wang Z, Inoue K, Yamamoto Y (2008) Long-distance entanglement-based quantum key distribution over optical fiber. Opt Express 16(23):19118–19126
Fujiwara M, Yoshino KI, Nambu Y, Yamashita T, Miki S, Terai H, Wang Z, Toyoshima M, Tomita A, Sasaki M (2014) Modified E91 protocol demonstration with hybrid entanglement photon source. Opt Express 22(11):13616–13624
Li L, Li H, Li C, Chen X, Chang Y, Yang Y, Li J (2018) The security analysis of E91 protocol in collective-rotation noise channel. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 14(5):1–7
Sharma A, Lenka SK (2016) E91 QKD protocol for authentication in online banking systems. Int J Bus Inf Syst 22(1):116–122
Lo HK (2001) Proof of unconditional security of six-state quantum key distribution scheme. Quantum Inf Comput 1(2):81–94
Kato G, Tamaki K (2016) Security of six-state quantum key distribution protocol with threshold detectors. Sci Rep 6:1–5
Garapo K, Mafu M, Petruccione F (2016) Intercept-resend attack on six-state quantum key distribution over collective-rotation noise channels. Chin Phys B 25(7):070303-1–070303-7
Bechmann-Pasquinucci H, Gisin N (1999) Incoherent and coherent eavesdropping in the six-state protocol of quantum cryptography. Phys Rev A 59:4238
Azuma H, Ban M (2019) The intercept/resend attack and the collective attack on the six-state protocol of the quantum key distribution, pp 1–24. arXiv:1912.00196
Scarani V, Acin A, Ribordy G, Gisin N (2004) Quantum cryptography protocols robust against photon number splitting attacks for weak laser pulse implementations. Phys Rev Lett 92:057901
Chuang I, Oliver W, Shor W (2019) Sarg04. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SARG04. Accessed 24 May 2019
Branciard C, Gisin N, Kraus B, Scarani V (2005) Security of two quantum cryptography protocols using the same four qubit states. Phys Rev A 72(3):032301
Koashi M (2005) Security of quantum key distribution with discrete rotational symmetry. arXiv:quant-ph/0507154
Fung CF, Tamaki K, Lo HK (2005) On the performance of two protocols: SARG04 and BB84. arXiv:quant-ph/0510025
Lucamarini M, Patel KA, Dynes JF, Frohlich B, Sharpe AW, Dixon AR, Yuan ZL, Penty RV, Shields AJ (2013) Efficient decoy-state quantum key distribution with quantified security. Opt Express 21(21):24550–24565
Comandar LC, Frohlich B, Lucamarini M, Patel KA, Sharpe AW, Dynes JF, Yuan ZL, Penty RV, Shields AJ (2014) Room temperature single-photon detectors for high bit rate quantum key distribution. Appl Phys Lett 104:021101
Bennett CH, Wiesner SJ (1992) Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen states. Phys Rev Lett 69:2881
Bechmann-Pasquinucci H, Peres A (2000) Quantum cryptography with 3-state systems. Phys Rev Lett 85(15):3313–3316
Inoue K, Waks E, Yamamoto Y (2002) Differential phase shift quantum key distribution. Phys Rev Lett 89(3):037902
Deng FG, Long GL (2004) Bidirectional quantum key distribution protocol with practical faint laser pulses. Phys Rev A 70(1):012311
Stucki D, Fasel S, Gisin N, Thoma Y, Zbinden H (2007) Coherent one-way quantum key distribution. International Congress on optics and optoelectronics, Prague, Czech. In: Proceedings photon counting applications, quantum optics, and quantum cryptography, p 6583
Pan C, Yan-Song L, Fu-Guo D, Gui-Lu L (2007) Measuring-basis encrypted quantum key distribution with four-state systems. Commun Theor Phys 47:49–52
Khan MM, Murphy M, Beige A (2009) High error-rate quantum key distribution for long-distance communication. New J Phys 11:063043
Gao F, Liu B, Wen QY, Chen H (2012) Flexible quantum private queries based on quantum key distribution. Opt Express 20(16):17411–17420
Wei CY, Gao F, Wen QY, Wang TY (2014) Practical quantum private query of blocks based on unbalanced-state Bennett–Brassard-1984 quantum-key-distribution protocol. Sci Rep 4:7537-1–7537-7
Gao F, Liu B, Huang W, Wen QY (2015) Post processing of the oblivious key in quantum private query. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 21(3):6600111
Beige A, Englert BG, Kurtsiefer C, Weinfurter H (2002) Secure communication with a publicly known key. Acta Phys Pol A 101:357–368
Hong-Mei H (2015) Quantum secure direct communication protocol based on cluster entangled state. In: $$10^{th}$$ international conference on P2P, parallel, grid, cloud and internet computing (3PGCIC). Krakow, Poland, pp 440–443
Bostrom K, Felbinger T (2002) Deterministic secure direct communication using entanglement. Phys Rev Lett 89:187902
Wojcik A (2003) Eavesdropping on the “Ping-pong” quantum communication protocol. Phys Rev Lett 90:157901
Cai QY (2003) The “ping-pong” protocol can be attacked without eavesdropping. Phys Rev Lett 91:109801
Zhang Z, Man Z, Li Y (2004) Improving Wojcik’s eavesdropping attack on ping-pong protocol. Phys Lett A 333:46–50
Fu-Guo D, Xi-Han L, Chun-Yan L, Ping Z, Hong-Yu Z (2007) Eavesdropping on the “Ping-Pong” quantum communication protocol freely in a noise channel. Chin Phys 16:277–281
Lucamarini M, Mancini S (2005) Secure deterministic communication without entanglement. Phys Rev Lett 94:140501-1–140501-4
Han YG, Yin ZQ, Li HW, Chen W, Wang S, Guo GC, Han ZF (2014) Security of modified ping-pong protocol in noisy and lossy channel. Sci Rep 4:4936
Chamoli A, Bhandari CM (2009) Secure direct communication based on ping-pong protocol. Quantum Inf Process 8:347–356
Naseri M (2010) Comment on: Secure direct communication based on ping-pong protocol. Quantum Inf Process 9:693–698
Chun-Yan L, Hong-Yu Z, Yan W, Fu-Guo D (2005) Secure quantum key distribution network with Bell states and local unitary operations. Chin Phys Lett 22:1049–1052
Li XH, Deng FG, Li CY, Liang YJ, Zhou P, Zhou H (2006) Deterministic secure quantum communication without maximally entangled states. J Korean Phys Soc 49(4):1354–1359
Li J, Zhou Z, Wang N, Tian Y, Yang YG, Zheng Y (2019) Deterministic quantum secure direct communication protocol based on hyper-entangled state. IEEE Access 7:43948–43955
Zhang W, Ding DS, Sheng YB, Zhou L, Shi BS, Guo GC (2017) Quantum secure direct communication with quantum memory. Phys Rev Lett 118:2205011–2205016
Min-Jie W, Wei P (2008) Quantum secure direct communication based on authentication. Chin Phys Lett 25(11):3860–3863
Dan L, Chang-Xing P, Dong-Xiao Q, Nan Z (2010) A new quantum secure direct communication scheme with authentication. Chin Phys Lett 27:0503061–0503063
Huang D, Chen Z, Guo Y, Lee MH (2007) Quantum secure direct communication based on chaos with authentication. J Phys Soc Jpn 76:124001-1–124001-4
Chen XB, Wen QY, Guo FZ, Sun Y, Xu G, Zhu FC (2008) Controlled quantum secure direct communication with W state. Int J Quantum Inf 6:899–906
Chen ZN, Qin Z, Lu L (2009) A quantum secure direct communication with authentication. Inf Technol J 8(7):1027–1032
Yang XY, Ma Z, Lu X, Li HX (2009) Quantum secure direct communication based on partially entangled states. In: Fifth international conference on information assurance and security, 18–20 Aug, vol 2, pp 11–14
Yu CH, Guo GD, Lin S (2013) Quantum secure direct communication with authentication using two nonorthogonal states. Int J Theor Phys 52:1937–1945
Yang CW, Hwang T, Lin TH (2013) Modification attack on QSDC with authentication and the improvement. Int J Theor Phys 52:2230–2234
Hu JY, Yu B, Jing MY, Xiao LT, Jia ST, Qin GQ, Long GL (2016) Experimental quantum secure direct communication with single photons. Light Sci Appl 5:e16144
Sarvaghad-Moghaddam M (2019) Efficient controlled bidirectional quantum secure direct communication using entanglement swapping in a network. arXiv:1902.11188 1–15
Hong C, Yang H (2006) Comment on “Quantum dialogue protocol”, pp 1–4. arXiv:quant-ph/0606174
YuGuang Y, QiaoYan W (2007) Quasi-secure quantum dialogue using single photons. Sci China Press G Phys Mech Astron 50(5):558–562
Xia Y, Fu CB, ZHANG S, Hong SK, Yeon KH, Um CI (2006) Quantum dialogue by using the GHZ state. J Korean Phys Soc 48:24–27
Yan X, Jie S, Jing N, He-Shan S (2007) Controlled secure quantum dialogue using a pure entangled GHZ states. Commun Theor Phys 48(5):841–846
Cao G, Jiang M (2017) Multi-party quantum dialogue protocol based on multi-particle GHZ states, 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), 20–22 Oct 2017, Jinan, China, pp 1614–1618
Gong L, Tian C, Li J, Zou X (2018) Quantum network dialogue protocol based on continuous-variable GHZ states. Quantum Inf Process 17(331):1–12
Chou YH, Zeng GJ, Chang ZH, Kuo SY (2018) Dynamic group multi-party quantum key agreement. Sci Rep 8:4633
Boyer M, Kenigsberg D, Mor T (2007) Quantum key distribution with classical Bob. Phys Rev Lett 99(14):140501
Krawec WO (2014) Restricted attacks on semi-quantum key distribution protocols. Quantum Inf Process 13:2417–2436
Zou X, Qiu D, Li L, Wu L, Li L (2009) Semiquantum-key distribution using less than four quantum states. Phys Rev A 79:0522312
Zhang W, Qiu D, Mateus P (2008) Security of a single-state semi-quantum key distribution protocol. Quantum Inf Process 17(6):1–21
Xian-Zhou Z, Wei-Gui G, Yong-Gang T, Zhen-Zhong R, Xiao-Tian G (2009) Quantum key distribution series network protocol with M-classical Bobs. Chin Phys B 18:2143
Jian W, Sheng Z, Quan Z, Chao-Jing T (2011) Semiquantum key distribution using entangled states. Chin Phys Lett 28:100301
Li L, Qiu D, Mateus P (2013) Quantum secret sharing with classical bobs. J Phys A: Math Theor 46:045304-1–045304-11
Yu KF, Yang CW, Liao CH, Hwang T (2014) Authenticated semi-quantum key distribution protocol using Bell states. Quantum Inf Process 13:1457–1465
Luo YP, Hwang T (2015) Authenticated semi-quantum direct communication protocols using Bell states. Quantum Inf Process 15:947–958
Zou X, Qiu D, Zhang S, Mateus P (2015) Semiquantum key distribution without invoking the classical party’s measurement capability. Quantum Inf Process 14:2981–2996
Chou WH, Hwang T, Gu J (2016) Semi-quantum private comparison protocol under an almost-dishonest third party, pp 1–18. arXiv:1607.07961
Lu H, Barbeau M, Nayak A (2017) Economic no-key semi-quantum direct communication protocol. IEEE Globecom Workshops, Singapore, 4–8 Dec 2017, pp 1–7
Boyer M, Katz M, Liss R, Mor T (2017) Experimentally feasible protocol for semiquantum key distribution. Phys Rev A 96(6):062335-1–062335-6
Thapliyal K, Sharma RD, Pathak A (2018) Orthogonal-state-based and semi-quantum protocols for quantum private comparison in noisy environment. Int J Quantum Inf 16(5):1850047-1–1850047-27
Krawec WO (2015) Security proof of a semi-quantum key distribution protocol. In: IEEE international symposium on information theory (ISIT), Hong Kong, China 14–19 June 2015, pp 686–690
Krawec WO (2016) Security of a semi-quantum protocol where reflections contribute to the secret key. Quantum Inf Process 15(5):2067–2090
Tsai CW, Yang CW, Lee NY (2019) Semi-quantum secret sharing protocol using W-state. Mod Physi Lett A 34(27):1950213-1–1950213-12
Lin PH, Tsai CW, Hwang T (2019) Mediated semi-quantum key distribution using single photons. Annalen Der Physik 531(8):1800347-1–1800347-7
Wen XJ, Zhao XQ, Gong LH, Zhou NR (2019) A semi-quantum authentication protocol for message and identity. Laser Phys Lett 16:075206-1–075206-10
Tao Z, Chang Y, Zhang S, Dai J, Li X (2019) Two semi-quantum direct communication protocols with mutual authentication based on Bell states. Int J Theor Phys 58:2986–2993
Sun Y, Yan L, Chang Y, Zhang S, Shao T, Zhang Y (2019) Two semi-quantum secure direct communication protocols based on Bell states. Mod Phys Lett A 34(1):1950004-1–1950004-10
Yang CW (2020) Efficient and secure semi-quantum secure direct communication protocol against double Cnot attack. Quantum Inf Process 19:1–15
Zhou NR, Zhu KN, Bi W, Gong LH (2019) Semi-quantum identifcation. Quantum Inf Process 18:197-1–197-17
Yan L, Sun YH, Chang Y, Zhang SB, Wan GG, Sheng ZW (2018) Semi-quantum protocol for deterministic secure quantum communication using Bell states. Quantum Inf Process 17:315-1–315-12
Bechmann-Pasquinucci H, Tittel W (2000) Quantum cryptography using larger alphabets. Phys Rev A 61(6):0623081–06230812
Tan YG, Lu H, Cai QY (2009) Comment on “Quantum key distribution with classical Bob”. Phys Rev Lett 102(9):098901–1
Boyer M, Mor R (2011) Comment on Semiquantum-key distribution using less than four quantum states. Phys Rev A 83:046301-1–046301-2
Zou X, Qiu D (2011) Reply to “comment on ‘semiquantum-key distribution using less than four quantum states”’. Phys Rev A 83:046302-1–046302-2
Gurevich P (2013) Experimental quantum key distribution with classical Alice. The Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Thesis Master of Science in Computer Science
Nie YY, Li YH, Wang ZS (2013) Semi-quantum information splitting using GHZ-type states. Quantum Inf Process 12(1):437–448
Maitra A, Paul G (2013) Eavesdropping in semiquantum key distribution protocol. Inf Process Lett 113(12):418–422
Boyer M, Mor T (2015) On the robustness of quantum key distribution with classical Alice (Photons-based protocol). In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on quantum, nano/bio, and micro technologies, ICQNM2015, Venice, Italy, vol 9, pp 29–34
Xie C, Li L, Qiu D (2015) A novel semi-quantum secret sharing scheme of specific bits. Int J Theor Phys 54(10):3819–3824
Krawec WO (2015) Semi-quantum key distribution: Protocols, security analysis, and new models, PhD thesis, Stevens Institute of Technology
Yin A, Fu F (2016) Eavesdropping on semi-quantum secret sharing scheme of specific bits. Int J Theor Phys 55(9):4027–4035
Meslouhi A, Hassouni Y (2017) Cryptanalysis on authenticated semi-quantum key distribution protocol using Bell states. Quantum Inf Process 16(18):1–17
Zhang W, Qiu D (2017) A single-state semi-quantum key distribution protocol and its security proof, pp 1-12. arXiv:1612.03087
Shukla C, Thapliyal K, Pathak A (2017) Semi-quantum communication: protocols for key agreement, controlled secure direct communication and dialogue. Quantum Inf Process 16(12):2951–29519
Gao X, Zhang S, Chang Y (2017) Cryptanalysis and improvement of the semi-quantum secret sharing protocol. Int J Theor Phys 56(8):2512–2520
Zhang MH, Li HF, Xia ZQ, Feng XY, Peng JY (2017) Semiquantum secure direct communication using EPR pairs. Quantum Inf Process 16(5):117-1–117-14
Yin A, Wang Z, Fu F (2017) A novel semi-quantum secret sharing scheme based on Bell states. Mod Phys Lett B 31(13):1750150-1–1750150-6
Zhu KN, Zhou NR, Wang YQ, Wen XJ (2018) Semi-quantum key distribution protocols with GHZ states. Int J Theor Phys 57(12):3621–3631
He J, Li Q, Wu C, Chan WH, Zhang S (2018) Measurement-device-independent semiquantum key distribution. Int J Quantum Inf 16(2):1850012-1–1850012-10
Krawec WO (2018) Practical security of semi-quantum key distribution. In: Proceeding of quantum information science, sensing, and computation X, International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol 10660, p 1066009
Xie C, Li L, Situ H, He J (2018) Semi-quantum secure direct communication scheme based on Bell states. Int J Theor Phys 57(6):1881–1887
Liu L, Xiao M, Song X (2018) Authenticated semiquantum dialogue with secure delegated quantum computation over a collective noise channel. Quantum Inf Process 17(12):342-1–342-17
Zhang W, Qiu D, Mateus P (2018) Security of a single-state semi-quantum key distribution protocol. Quantum Inf Process 17:135-1–135-21
Yan-Feng L (2018) Semi-quantum private comparison using single photons. Int J Theor Phys 57(10):3048–3055
Ye TY, Ye CQ (2018) Measure-resend semi-quantum private comparison without entanglement. Int J Theor Phys 57(12):3819–3834
Zhao XQ, Chen HY, Wang YQ, Zhou NR (2019) Semi-quantum Bi-signature scheme based on W states. Int J Theor Phys 58(10):3239–3251
Yan LL, Zhang SB, Chang Y, Sheng ZW, Yang F (2019) Mutual semiquantum key agreement protocol using Bell states. Mod Phys Lett A 34(35):1950294
Yan L, Zhang S, Chang Y, Sheng Z, Sun Y (2019) Semi-quantum key agreement and private comparison protocols using Bell states. Int J Theor Phys 58:3852–3862
Lu H, Barbeau M, Nayak A (2019) Keyless semi-quantum point-to-point communication protocol with low resource requirements. Sci Rep 9(1):64-1–64-15
Tsai CW, Yang CW, Lee NY (2019) Lightweight mediated semi-quantum key distribution protocol. Mod Phys Lett A 34:1950281-1–1950281-13
Yao AC (1982) Protocols for secure computations. In: Proceedings of the $$23^{rd}$$ annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science (SCFS1982). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp 160–164
Zhang WW, Li D, Zhang KJ, Zuo HJ (2013) A quantum protocol for millionaire problem with Bell states. Quantum Inf Process 12:2241–2249
Dong L, Xiu XM, Gao YJ, Chi F (2008) Multiparty controlled deterministic secure quantum communication through entanglement swapping. Int J Mod Phys C 19(11):1673–1681
Shi RH, Zhong H (2013) Multi-party quantum key agreement with Bell states and bell measurements. Quantum Inf Process 12:921–932
Liu Y, Chen TY, Wang LJ, Liang H, Shentu GL, Wang J, Cui K, Yin HL, Liu NL, Li L, Ma X, Pelc JS, Fejer MM, Peng CZ, Zhang Q, Pan JW (2013) Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys Rev Lett 111(13):130502
Sun Z, Zhang C, Wang B, Li Q, Long D (2013) Improvements on “multiparty quantum key agreement with single particles.”. Quantum Inf Process 12:3411–3420
Yin XR, Ma WP, Shen DS, Wang LL (2013) Three-party quantum key agreement with bell states. Acta Phys Sin 62(17):170304-1–170304-6
Yin XR, Ma WP, Liu WY (2013) Three-party quantum key agreement with two-photon entanglement. Int J Theor Phys 52:3915–3921
Zhu ZC, Hu AQ, Fu AM (2016) Participant attack on three-party quantum key agreement with two-photon entanglement. Int J Theor Phys 55(1):55–61
Shukla C, Alam N, Pathak A (2014) Protocols of quantum key agreement solely using bell states and Bell measurement. Quantum Inf Process 13:2391–2405
Zhu ZC, Hu AQ, Fu AM (2015) Improving the security of protocols of quantum key agreement solely using Bell states and Bell measurement. Quantum Inf Process 14(11):4245–4254
Gu J, Hwang T (2017) Comment on improving the security of protocols of quantum key agreement solely using Bell states and Bell measurement. In: IEEE conference on dependable and secure computing, 7–10 Aug 2017. Taiwan, Taipei, pp 520–521
Luo QB, Yang GW, She K, Niu WN, Wang YQ (2014) Multi-party quantum private comparison protocol based on d-dimensional entangled states. Quantum Inf Process 13(10):2343–2352
Huang W, Wen QY, Liu B, Su Q, Gao F (2014) Cryptanalysis of a multi-party quantum key agreement protocol with single particles. Quantum Inf Process 13:1651–1657
Smania M, Elhassan AM, Tavakoli A, Bourennane M (2016) Experimental quantum multiparty communication protocols. NPJ Quantum Inf 2:16010-1–16010-4
Sun Z, Yu J, Wang P (2016) Efficient multi-party quantum key agreement by cluster states. Quantum Inf Process 15:373–384
Sun Z, Zhang C, Wang P, Yu J, Zhang Y, Long D (2016) Multi-party quantum key agreement by an entangled six-qubit state. Int J Theor Phys 55(3):1920–1929
Sun Z, Huang J, Wang P (2016c) Efficient multiparty quantum key agreement protocol based on commutative encryption. Quantum Inf Process 15:2101–2111
Liu B, Xiao D, Jia HY (2016) Collusive attacks to “circle-type” multi-party quantum key agreement protocols. Quantum Inf Process 15:2113–2124
Huang W, Su Q, Xu B, Liu B, Fan F, Jia HY, Yang YH (2016) Improved multiparty quantum key agreement in travelling mode. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 59(12):120311-1–120311-10
Huang W, Su Q, Liu B, He YH, Fan F, Xu BJ (2017) Efficient multiparty quantum key agreement with collective detection. Sci Rep 7:15264-1–15264-9
Liu WJ, Chen ZY, Ji S, Wang HB, Zhang J (2017) Multi-party semi-quantum key agreement with delegating quantum computation. Int J Theor Phys 56(10):3164–3174
Wang P, Sun Z, Sun X (2017) Multi-party quantum key agreement protocol secure against collusion attack. Quantum Inf Process 16:170-1–170-10
Zhou NR, Zhu KN, Zou XF (2019) Multiparty semiquantum key distribution protocol with four-particle cluster states. Ann Phys 531(8):1800520-1–1800520-12
Sun Z, Cheng R, Wu C, Zheng C (2019) New fair multiparty quantum key agreement secure against collusive attacks. Sci Rep 9:17177-1–17177-8
Cao H, Ma W (2017) Multiparty quantum key agreement based on quantum search algorithm. Sci Rep 7:45046-1–45046-10
Cao WF, Zhen YZ, Zheng YL, Li L, Chen ZB, Liu NL, Chen K (2018) One-sided measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys Rev A 97:012313
Sun Z, Wu C, Zheng S, Zhang C (2019) Efficient multiparty quantum key agreement with a single d-level quantum system secure against collusive attack. IEEE Access 7:102377–102385
Huang WC, Yang YK, Jiang D, Chen LJ (2019) Efficient travelling-mode quantum key agreement against participant’s attacks. Sci Rep 9:16421-1–16421-9
He WT, Wang J, Zhang TT, Alzahrani F, Hobiny A, Alsaedi A, Hayat T, Deng FG (2019) High-efficiency three-party quantum key agreement protocol with quantum dense coding and Bell states. Int J Theor Phys 58:2834–2846
Jo Y, Park HS, Lee SW, Son W (2019) Efficient high-dimensional quantum key distribution with hybrid encoding. Entropy 21:80
Mohajer R, Eslami Z (2017) Cryptanalysis of a multiparty quantum key agreement protocol based on commutative encryption. Quantum Inf Process 16:197-1–197-9
Lydersen L, Wiechers C, Wittmann C, Elser D, Skaar J, Makarov V (2010) Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination. Nat Photonics 4:686–689
Mayers D, Yao A (1998) Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus. In: Proceeding $$39^{th}$$ annual symposium on foundations of computer science, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 8–11 Nov 1998, pp 1–7
Barrett J, Hardy L, Kent A (2005) No signalling and quantum key distribution. Phys Rev Lett 95:010503
Clauser JF, Horne MA, Shimony A, Holt RA (1969) Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys Rev Lett 23:880–884
Colbeck R (2006) Quantum and relativistic protocols for secure multi-party computation, PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge
Pironio S, Acin A, Brunner N, Gisin N, Massar S, Scarani V (2009) Device-independent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks. New J Phys 11:045021-1–045021-26
Acin A, Brunner N, Gisin N, Massar S, Pironio S, Scarani V (2007) Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Phys Rev Lett 98:230501-1–230501-4
Lucamarini M, Vallone G, Gianani I, Mataloni P, Giuseppe GD (2012) Device-independent entanglement-based Bennett 1992 protocol. Phys Rev A 86(3):032325
Branciard C, Cavalcanti EG, Walborn SP, Scarani V, Wiseman HM (2012) One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: security, feasibility, and the connection with steering. Phys Rev A 85(1):010301
Tomamichel M, Fehr S, Kaniewski J, Wehner S (2013) One-sided Device-independent QKD and position-based cryptography from monogamy games, advances in cryptology-EUROCRYPT. In: 32nd annual international conference on the theory and applications of cryptographic techniques, Athens, Greece, May 26–30. Lecture notes in computer science (LNCS), vol 7881, pp 609–625
Walk N, Hosseini S, Geng J, Thearle O, Haw JY, Armstrong S, Assad SM, Janousek J, Ralph TC, Symul T, Wiseman HM, Lam PK (2016) Experimental demonstration of Gaussian protocols for one-sided device-independent quantum key distribution. Optica 3(6):634–642
Lo HK, Curty M, Qi B (2012) Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys Rev Lett 108(13):130503
Xu F, Curty M, Qi B, Lo HK (2015) Measurement-device-independent quantum cryptography. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electronics 21(3):148–158
Tang Z, Wei K, Bedroya O, Qian L, Lo HK (2016) Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with imperfect sources. Phys Rev A 93:042308
Valivarthi R, Umesh P, John C, Owen KA, Verma VB, Nam SW, Oblak D, Zhou Q, Tittel W (2019) Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution coexisting with classical communication. Quantum Sci Technol 4(4):045002
Xu F, Curty M, Qi B, Lo HK (2013) Practical aspects of measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. New J Phys 15:113007
Roberts GL, Lucamarini M, Yuan ZL, Dynes JF, Comandar LC, Sharpe AW, Shields AJ, Curty M, Puthoor IV, Andersson E (2017) Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum digital signatures. Nat Commun 8:1098
Hu XL, Cao Y, Yu ZW, Wang XB (2018) Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution over asymmetric channel and unstable channel. Sci Rep 8:17634
Qiao Y, Wang G, Li Z, Xu B, Guo H (2019) Monitoring an untrusted light source with single-photon detectors in measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys Rev A 99(5):052302
Cui ZX, Zhong W, Zhou L, Sheng YB (2019) Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with hyper-encoding. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 62:110311
Dellantonio L, Sorensen AS, Bacco D (2018) High-dimensional measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution on two-dimensional subspaces. Phys Rev A 98:062301
Pawlowski M, Brunner N (2011) Semi-device-independent security of one-way quantum key distribution. Phys Rev A 84(1):010302
Yang W, Wan-Su B, Hong-Wei L, Chun Z, Yuan L (2014) Security of a practical semi-device-independent quantum key distribution protocol against collective attacks. Chin Phys B 23(8):080303
Dall’Arno M, Passaro E, Gallego R, Pawlowski M, Acin A (2015) Detection loophole attacks on semi-device-independent quantum and classical protocols. Quantum Inf Comput 15:0037
Chaturvedi A, Ray M, Veynar R, Pawlowski M (2018) On the security of semi-device-independent QKD protocols. Quantum Inf Process 17:131
Woodhead E, Lim CCW, Pironio S (2012) Semi-device-independent QKD based on BB84 and a CHSH-type estimation. In: $$7^{th}$$ conference, TQC: conference on quantum computation, communication, and cryptography, Tokyo, Japan, May 17–19, Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication, and Cryptography, vol 7, pp 107–115
Lim CCW, Korzh B, Martin A, Bussieres F, Thew R, Zbinden H (2014) Detector-device-independent quantum key distribution. Appl Phys Lett 105:221112
Gonzalez P, Rebon L, Silva TFD, Figueroa M, Saavedra C, Curty M, Lima G, Xavier GB, Nogueira WAT (2015) Quantum key distribution with untrusted detectors. Phys Rev A 92(2):022337
Wei K, Liu H, Ma H, Yang X, Zhang Y, Sun Y, Xiao J, Ji Y (2017) Feasible attack on detector-device-independent quantum key distribution. Sci Rep 7:449-1–449-8
Sajeed S, Huang A, Sun S, Xu F, Makarov V, Curty M (2016) Insecurity of detector-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys Rev Lett 117(25):250505
Rivest RL, Shamir A, Adleman L (1978) A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Commun ACM 21(2):120–126
Rivest AL, Adleman L, Dertouzos M (1978b) On data banks and privacy homomorphisms. Found Secure Comput 4(11):169–180
Buchmann J, Williams HC (1988) A key-exchange system based on imaginary quadratic fields. J Cryptol 1(2):107–118
Bernstein DJ (2009) Introduction to post-quantum cryptography. In: Bernstein DJ, Buchmann J, Dahmen E (eds) Post-quantum cryptography. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–14
McEliece RJ (1978) A public-key cryptosystem based on algebraic coding theory. The deep space network progress report, DSN PR 42-44, pp 114–116
Overbeck R, Sendrier N (2009) Code-based cryptography. Book chapter in post-quantum cryptography. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–145
Hoffstein J, Pipher J, Silverman JH (1998) NTRU: a ring-based public key cryptosystem. In: International algorithmic number theory symposium ANTS 1998: algorithmic number theory. Lecture notes in computer science, LNCS, Springer, vol 1423, pp 267–288
Biasse JF, Song F (2016) Efficient quantum algorithms for computing class groups and solving the principal ideal problem in arbitrary degree number fields. In: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (SODA’16), pp 893–902
Cramer R, Ducas L, Wesolowski B (2017) Short stickelberger class relations and application to ideal-SVP. In: Proceeding of international association for cryptologic research (EUROCRYPT 2017), Lecture notes in computer science (LNCS), vol 10210, pp 324–348
Laarhoven T (2015) Sieving for shortest vectors in lattices using angular locality-sensitive hashing. In: 35th annual cryptology conference on advances in cryptology (CRYPTO 2015), Santa Barbara, CA, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9215, pp 3–22
Laarhoven T, Weger BD (2015) Faster sieving for shortest lattice vectors using spherical locality-sensitive hashing. In: Proceedings of $$4^{th}$$ international conference on cryptology and information security in Latin America (LATINCRYPT 2015), Lecture notes in computer science book series (LNCS), vol 9230, pp 101–118
Becker A, Ducas L, Gama N, Laarhoven T (2016) New directions in nearest neighbor searching with applications to lattice sieving. In: Proceedings of the twenty-seventh annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms (SODA 2016), Arlington, VA, USA, January 10–12 2016, pp 10–24
Lamport L (1979) Constructing digital signatures from a one way function. In: SRI international computer science laboratory. Report no SRI-CSL-98, vol 1423, pp 1–7. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2016/12/Constructing-Digital-Signatures-from-a-One-Way-Function.pdf
Merkle RC (1989) A certified digital signature. In: Conference on the theory and application of cryptology CRYPTO 1989: advances in cryptology-CRYPTO’89. Lecture notes in computer science book series (LNCS), vol 435, pp 218–238
Dods C, Smart NP, Stam M (2005) Hash based digital signature schemes. In: 10th proceeding of IMA international conference on cryptography and coding (IMACC 2005), Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, vol 3796, pp 96–115
Hulsing A (2013) $${W}-{OTS}^+-$$shorter signatures for hash-based signature schemes. In: Proceeding of $$6^{th}$$ international conference on cryptology in Africa, Cairo, Egypt, June 22–24, Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, vol 7918, pp 173–188
Patarin J (1997) The oil and vinegar signature scheme. Presented at the Dagstuhl workshop on cryptography
Ding J, Schmidt D (2005) Rainbow, a new multivariable polynomial signature scheme. In: International conference on applied cryptography and network security—ACNS 2005. Lecture notes in computer science, Springer, vol 3531, pp 164–175
Patarin J, Courtois N, Goubin L (2001) QUARTZ, 128-bit long digital signatures, cryptographers track at the RSA conference, CT-RSA 2001: topics in cryptology, CT-RSA2001, Lecture notes in computer science (LNCS). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, vol 2020, pp 282–297
NIST Post Quantum Cryptography. https://csrc.nist.gov/news/2019/pqc-standardization-process-2nd-round-candidates. 26 Feb 2020
Chen L, Jordan S, Liu YK, Moody D, Peralta R, Perlner R, Smith-Tone D (2016) Report on post-quantum cryptography. Report of National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce, NISTIR 8105. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2016/NIST.IR.8105.pdf
EL-Latif A A A, Abd-El-Atty B, Hossain M S, Elmougy S, Ghoneim A (2018) Secure quantum steganography protocol for fog cloud internet of things. IEEE Access 6:10332–10340
Amer O, Krawec WO (2019) Semiquantum key distribution with high quantum noise tolerance. Phys Rev A 100:022319-1–022319-16
Chun H, Choi I, Faulkner G, Clarke L, Barber B, George G, Capon C, Niskanen A, Wabnig J, O’Brien D, Bitauld D (2017) Handheld free space quantum key distribution with dynamic motion compensation. Opt Express 25(6):6784–6795
Nordholt JE, Hughes RJ, Newell RT, Peterson CG, Rosenberg D, McCabe KP, Tyagi KT, Dallman N(2010) Quantum key distribution using card, base station and trusted authority, US Patent, Los Alamos National Security, LLC (Los Alamos, NM) DOE Contract Number AC52–06NA25396
Hughes RJ, Nordholt JE, Peterson CG (2010) Secure multi-party communication with quantum key distribution managed by trusted authority, US Patent, Los Alamos National Security, LLC (Los Alamos, NM) DOE Contract Number AC52–06NA25396
Battelle (2020) The future of security: zeroing in on un-hackable data with quantum key distribution https://www.wired.com/insights/2014/09/quantum-key-distribution/. Accessed 20 Feb 2020
Yin J, Cao Y, Li YH, Liao SK, Zhang L, Ren JG, Cai WQ, Liu WY, Li B, Dai H, Li GB, Lu QM, Gong YH, Xu Y, Li SL, Li FZ, Yin YY, Jiang ZQ, Li M, Jia JJ, Ren G, He D, Zhou YL, Zhang XX, Wang N, Chang X, Zhu ZC, Liu NL, Chen YA, Lu CY, Shu R, Peng CZ, Wang JY, Pan JW (2017) Satellite-based entanglement distribution Over 1200 kilometers. Science 356:1140–1144
Liao SK, Cai WQ, Liu WY, Zhang L, Li Y, Ren JG, Yin J, Shen Q, Cao Y, Li ZP, Li FZ, Chen XW, Sun LH, Jia JJ, Wu JC, Jiang XJ, Wang JF, Huang YM, Wang Q, Zhou YL, Deng L, Xi T, Ma L, Hu T, Zhang Q, Chen YA, Liu NL, Wang XB, Zhu ZC, Lu CY, Shu R, Peng CZ, Wang JY, Pan JW (2017) Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution. Nature 549:43–60
Liao SK, Cai WQ, Handsteiner J, Liu B, Yin J, Zhang L, Rauch D, Fink M, Ren JG, Liu WY, Li Y, Shen Q, Cao Y, Li FZ, Wang JF, Huang YM, Deng L, Xi T, Ma L, Hu T, Li L, Liu NL, Koidl F, Wang P, Chen YA, Wang XB, Steindorfer M, Kirchner G, Lu CY, Shu R, Ursin R, Scheidl T, Peng CZ, Wang JY, Zeilinger A, Pan JW (2018) Satellite-relayed intercontinental quantum network. Phys Rev Lett 120:030501-1–030501-4
Sharma V, Banerjee S (2019) Analysis of atmospheric effects on satellite-based quantum communication: a comparative study. Quantum Inf Process 18:Article no 67
Bedington R, Arrazola JM, Ling A (2017) Progress in satellite quantum key distribution. npj Quantum Inf 3:Article no 30
First quantum video call. https://www.innovations-report.com/html/reports/information-technology/austrian-and-chinese-academies-of-sciences-successfully-conducted-first-inter-continental-quantum-video-call.html. Accessed 6 Feb 2020
Broadbent A, Fitzsimons J, Kashefi E (2009) Universal blind quantum computation. In: $$50^{th}$$ annual IEEE symposium on foundations of computer science. Atlanta, CA, USA 25–27 Oct, pp 517–526
Fitzsimons JF (2017) Private quantum computation: an introduction to blind quantum computing and related protocols. NPJ Quantum Inf 3:23
Barz S, Kashefi E, Broadbent A, Fitzsimons JF, Zeilinger A, Walther P (2012) Demonstration of blind quantum computing. Science 335:303–308
Greganti C, Roehsner MC, Barz S, Morimae T, Walther P (2016) Demonstration of measurement-only blind quantum computing. New J Phys 18:013020
Huang HL, Zhao Q, Ma X, Liu C, Su ZE, Wang XL, Li L, Liu NL, Sanders BC, Lu CY, Pan JW (2017) Experimental blind quantum computing for a classical client. Phys Rev Lett 119:050503
Gottesman D, Chuang IL (2001) Quantum digital signatures, p 050503. arXiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0105032
Andersson E, Curty M, Jex I (2006) Experimentally realizable quantum comparison of coherent states and its applications. Phys Rev A 74:022304
Cai XQ, Wang TY, Wei CY, Gao F (2019) Cryptanalysis of multiparty quantum digital signatures. Quantum Inf Process 18(8):252
Shi WM, Wang YM, Zhou YH, Yang YG (2018) Cryptanalysis on quantum digital signature based on asymmetric quantum cryptography. Optik 154:258–260
Collins RJ, Donaldson RJ, Buller GS (2018) Progress in experimental quantum digital signatures. In: Proceedings of quantum communications and quantum imaging XVI, San Diego, California, United States, p 10771
Collins RJ, Amiri R, Fujiwara M, Honjo T, Shimizu K, Tamaki K, Takeoka M, Sasaki M, Andersson E, Buller GS (2017) Experimental demonstration of quantum digital signatures over 43db channel loss using differential phase shift quantum key distribution. Sci Rep 7:3235
Donaldson RJ, Collins RJ, Kleczkowska K, Amiri R, Wallden P, Dunjko V, Jeffers J, Andersson E, Buller GS (2016) Experimental demonstration of kilometer-range quantum digital signatures. Phys Rev A 93(1):012329
Mirhosseini M, Magana-Loaiza OS, O’Sullivan MN, Rodenburg B, Malik M, Lavery MPJ, Padgett MJ, Gauthier DJ, Boyd RW (2015) High-dimensional quantum cryptography with twisted light. New J Phys 17:033033
Canas G, Vera N, Carine J, Gonzalez P, Cardenas J, Connolly PWR, Przysiezna A, Gomez ES, Figueroa M, Vallone G, Villoresi P, Silva TFD, Xavier GB, Lima G (2017) High-dimensional decoy-state quantum key distribution over multicore telecommunication fibers. Phys Rev A 96:022317
Ding Y, Bacco D, Dalgaard K, Cai X, Zhou X, Rottwitt K, Oxenlowe LK (2017) High-dimensional quantum key distribution based on multicore fiber using silicon photonic integrated circuits. NPJ Quantum Inf 3:25
Mower J, Zhang Z, Desjardins P, Lee C, Shapiro JH, Englund D (2013) High-dimensional quantum key distribution using dispersive optics. Phys Rev A 87:062322
Brougham T, Barnett SM, McCusker KT, Kwiat PG, Gauthier DJ (2013) Security of high-dimensional quantum key distribution protocols using Franson interferometers. J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys 46(10):104010
Brougham T, Wildfeuer CF, Barnett SM, Gauthier DJ (2016) The information of high-dimensional time-bin encoded photons. Eur Phys J D 70:214
Islam NT (2018) High-rate, high-dimensional quantum key distribution systems, PhD Thesis, Duke University
Islam NT, Lim CCW, Cahall C, Qi B, Kim J, Gauthier DJ (2019) Scalable high-rate, high-dimensional quantum key distribution, pp 1–10. arXiv:1902.00811
Chandran N, Goyal V, Moriarty R, Ostrovsky R (2009) Position based cryptography. In: Proceedings of the $$29^{th}$$ annual international cryptology conference on advances in cryptology, vol 29. Springer, pp 391–407
Chandran N, Fehr S, Gelles R, Goyal V, Ostrovsky R (2010) Position-based quantum cryptography. https://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1005/1005.1750v1.pdf
Bilski P, Winiecki W (2013) Analysis of the position-based quantum cryptography usage in the distributed measurement system. Measurement 46(10):4353–4361
Buhrman H, Chandran N, Fehr S, Gelles R, Goyal V, Ostrovsky R, Schaffner C (2014) Position-based quantum cryptography: impossibility and constructions. SIAM J Comput 43(1):150–178
Chakraborty K, Leverrier A (2015) Practical position-based quantum cryptography. Phys Rev A 92:052304
Sibson P, Erven C, Godfrey M, Miki S, Yamashita T, Fujiwara M, Sasaki M, Terai H, Tanner MG, Natarajan CM, Hadfield RH, O’Brien JL, Thompson MG (2017) Chip-based quantum key distribution. Nat Commun 8:13984
Roger T, Paraiso T, Marco ID, Marangon DG, Yuan Z, Shields AJ (2019) Real-time interferometric quantum random number generation on chip. J Opt Soc Am B 36(3):B137–B142
Zhang G, Haw JY, Cai H, Xu F, Assad SM, Fitzsimons JF, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Yu S, Wu J, Ser W, Kwek LC, Liu AQ (2019) An integrated silicon photonic chip platform for continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Nat Photonics 13:839–842
Blum M (1981) Coin flipping by telephone. CRYPTO, pp 11–15
Molina-Terriza G, Vaziri A, Ursin R, Zeilinger A (2005) Experimental quantum coin tossing. Phys Rev Lett 94:040501
Colbeck R (2007) An entanglement-based protocol for strong coin tossing with bias 1/4. Phys Lett A 362:390–392
Spekkens RW, Rudolph T (2001) Degrees of concealment and bindingness in quantum bit commitment protocols. Phys Rev A 65:012310
Toshiba (2020) https://www.toshiba.eu/pages/eu/cambridge-research-laboratory/quantum-key-distribution/. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
QuantumCTek (2020). http://www.quantum-info.com/english/. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
ID Quantique SA, Switzerland (2020). www.idquantique.com. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
Cerberis (2020). https://www.idquantique.com/quantum-safe-security/products/cerberis3-qkd-system/. Accessed 18 Feb 2020
Boaron A, Boso G, Rusca D, Vulliez C, Autebert C, Caloz M, Perrenoud M, Gras G, Bussieres F, Li MJ, Nolan D, Martin A, Zbinden H (2018) Secure quantum key distribution over 421 km of optical fiber. Phys Rev Lett 121:190502
Travagnin M, Lewis A (2019) Quantum key distribution in-field implementations. JRC Technical Reports, pp 1–41
Yuan Z, Plews A, Takahashi R, Doi K, Tam W, Sharpe AW, Dixon AR, Lavelle E, Dynes JF, Murakami A, Kujiraoka M, Lucamarini M, Tanizawa Y, Sato H, Shields AJ (2018) 10-Mb/s quantum key distribution. J Lightwave Technol 36(16):3427–3433
Gheorghiu A, Kashefi E, Wallden P (2015) Robustness and device independence of verifiable blind quantum computing. New J Phys 17(8):083040
Klarreich E (2018) Graduate student solves quantum verification problem. QuantaMagazine