State of the Art MR Imaging Techniques for the Foot and Ankle

Schibany N, Ba-Ssalamah A, Marlovits S, et al. Impact of high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint. Eur J Radiol. 2005;55(2):283–8. Eshed I, Althoff CE, Feist E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of hindfoot involvement in patients with spondyloarthritides: comparison of low-field and high-field strength units. Eur J Radiol. 2008;65(1):140–7. Barr C, Bauer JS, Malfair D, et al. MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(6):1518–28. Sofka CM, Potter HG. MR imaging of joint arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2002;6(1):79–85. Tukeva TA, Aronen HJ, Karjalainen PT, Makela PJ. Low-field MRI pelvimetry. Eur Radiol. 1997;7(2):230–4. Erickson SJ. High-resolution imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiology. 1997;205(3):593–618. Hottya GA, Peterfy CG, Uffmann M, et al. Dedicated extremity MR imaging of the foot and ankle. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(3):467–75. Verhoek G, Zanetti M, Duewell S, Zollinger H, Hodler J. MRI of the foot and ankle: diagnostic performance and patient acceptance of a dedicated low field MR scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8(3):711–6. Kulkarni MV, Patton JA, Price RR. Technical considerations for the use of surface coils in MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147(2):373–8. Lee IS, Choi JA, Oh JH, et al. Microscopy coil for preoperative MRI of small soft-tissue masses of the hand and foot: comparison with conventional surface coil. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(6):W256–63. Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CW, Schottle PB, et al. Magic angle effect in MR imaging of ankle tendons: influence of foot positioning on prevalence and site in asymptomatic subjects and cadaveric tendons. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(10):2197–206. Fuller S, Reeder S, Shimakawa A, et al. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) fast spin-echo imaging of the ankle: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(6):1442–7. • Srikhum W, Nardo L, Karampinos DC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of ankle tendon pathology: benefits of additional axial short-tau inversion recovery imaging to reduce magic angle effects. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42(4):499–510. This paper provides a good discussion of the value of STIR imaging. Schick F, Dammann F, Lutz O, Claussen CD. Adapted techniques for clinical MR imaging of tendons. Magma. 1995;3(2):103–7. Hodgson RJ, Grainger AJ, O’Connor PJ, et al. Imaging of the Achilles tendon in spondyloarthritis: a comparison of ultrasound and conventional, short and ultrashort echo time MRI with and without intravenous contrast. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(6):1144–52. Hodgson RJ, Evans R, Wright P, et al. Quantitative magnetization transfer ultrashort echo time imaging of the Achilles tendon. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65(5):1372–6. Du J, Carl M, Diaz E, et al. Ultrashort TE T1rho (UTE T1rho) imaging of the Achilles tendon and meniscus. Magn Res Med. 2010;64(3):834–42. Gold GE, Thedens DR, Pauly JM, et al. MR imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: new methods using ultrashort TEs. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(5):1223–6. Choo HJ, Suh JS, Kim SJ, Huh YM, Kim MI, Lee JW. Ankle MRI for anterolateral soft tissue impingement: increased accuracy with the use of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D-FSPGR MRI. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9(5):409–15. Stevens KJ, Busse RF, Han E, et al. Ankle: isotropic MR imaging with 3D-FSE-cube-initial experience in healthy volunteers. Radiology. 2008;249(3):1026–33. Zanetti M, Weishaupt D. MR imaging of the forefoot: Morton neuroma and differential diagnoses. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2005;9(3):175–86. Weishaupt D, Treiber K, Kundert HP, et al. Morton neuroma: MR imaging in prone, supine, and upright weight-bearing body positions. Radiology. 2003;226(3):849–56. •• Linklater JM. Imaging of sports injuries in the foot. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(3):500–8. This paper provides a good summary of foot and ankle pathology and MRI protocols. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology. 1999;212(3):876–84. Zheng ZZ, Shan H, Li X. Fat-suppressed 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the cartilage with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(5):414–9. Tian CY, Shang Y, Zheng ZZ. Glenoid bone lesions: comparison between 3D VIBE images in MR arthrography and nonarthrographic MSCT. J Magn Res Imaging. 2012;36(1):231–6. Chhabra A, Subhawong TK, Bizzell C, Flammang A, Soldatos T. 3 T MR neurography using three-dimensional diffusion-weighted PSIF: technical issues and advantages. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(10):1355–60. • Chhabra A, Soldatos T, Subhawong TK, et al. The application of three-dimensional diffusion-weighted PSIF technique in peripheral nerve imaging of the distal extremities. J Magn Res Imaging. 2011;34(4):962–7. This paper provides a good discussion of the value of 3D steady-state free-precession imaging. Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ. Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2004;8(4):355–68. Mosher TJ, Liu Y, Yang QX, et al. Age dependency of cartilage magnetic resonance imaging T2 relaxation times in asymptomatic women. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(9):2820–8. David-Vaudey E, Ghosh S, Ries M, Majumdar S. T2 relaxation time measurements in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22(5):673–82. Bashir A, Gray ML, Burstein D. Gd-DTPA2-as a measure of cartilage degradation. Magn Res Med. 1996;36(5):665–73. Wheaton AJ, Dodge GR, Borthakur A, Kneeland JB, Schumacher HR, Reddy R. Detection of changes in articular cartilage proteoglycan by T(1rho) magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(1):102–8. Li X, Han ET, Ma CB, Link TM, Newitt DC, Majumdar S. In vivo 3 T spiral imaging based multi-slice T(1rho) mapping of knee cartilage in osteoarthritis. Magn Res Med. 2005;54(4):929–36. Regatte RR, Akella SV, Borthakur A, Kneeland JB, Reddy R. Proteoglycan depletion-induced changes in transverse relaxation maps of cartilage: comparison of T2 and T1rho. Acad Radiol. 2002;9(12):1388–94. Wendt RE 3rd, Wilcott MR 3rd, Nitz W, Murphy PH, Bryan RN. MR imaging of susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneities. Radiology. 1988;168(3):837–41. Frazzini VI, Kagetsu NJ, Johnson CE, Destian S. Internally stabilized spine: optimal choice of frequency-encoding gradient direction during MR imaging minimizes susceptibility artifact from titanium vertebral body screws. Radiology. 1997;204(1):268–72. Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH, et al. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(5):1207–13. Butts K, Pauly JM, Gold GE. Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI. Magn Res Med. 2005;53(2):418–24. Lu W, Pauly KB, Gold GE, Pauly JM, Hargreaves BA. SEMAC: slice encoding for metal artifact correction in MRI. Magn Res Med. 2009;62(1):66–76. Koch KM, Lorbiecki JE, Hinks RS, King KF. A multispectral three-dimensional acquisition technique for imaging near metal implants. Magn Res Med. 2009;61(2):381–90. Hayter CL, Koff MF, Shah P, Koch KM, Miller TT, Potter HG. MRI after arthroplasty: comparison of MAVRIC and conventional fast spin-echo techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(3):W405–11.