2009
2012
EVAR trial participants, 2005, Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 365, 2179, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66627-5
EVAR trial participants, 2005, Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 365, 2187, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66628-7
Prinssen, 2004, A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (DREAM), N Engl J Med, 351, 1607, 10.1056/NEJMoa042002
Lederle, 2012, Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, N Engl J Med, 367, 1988, 10.1056/NEJMoa1207481
Becquemin, 2011, A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patient, J Vasc Surg, 53, 1167, 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.10.124
Houbballah, 2010, Significant sac retraction after EVAR is a robust indicator of durable treatment success, J Vasc Surg, 52, 878, 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.069
Bley, 2009, Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: non-enhanced volumetric CT for follow-up, Radiology, 253, 253, 10.1148/radiol.2531082093
Harrison, 2011, Surveillance after EVAR based on duplex ultrasound and abdominal radiography, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 42, 187, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.03.027
Nagayama, 2012, EVAR surveillance of endoleak using maximum transverse diameter of aorta on non-enhanced CT, Acta Radiol, 53, 652, 10.1258/ar.2012.120018
Mirza, 2010, Duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for the diagnostic of endoleak after EVAR, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 39, 418, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.01.001
Ormesher, 2014, Use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced duplex ultrasound imaging during endovascular aneurysm repair, J Vasc Surg, 60, 1468, 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.095
Ten Bosch, 2010, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomographic angiography for surveillance of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, J Vasc Interv Radiol, 21, 638, 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.01.032
Cantisani, 2011, Prospective comparative analysis of colour-Doppler, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance in detecting endoleak after EVAR, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 41, 186, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.10.003
Gürtler, 2013, A comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging and multislice computed tomography in detecting and classifying endoleaks in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair, J Vasc Surg, 58, 340, 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.01.039
Millen, 2013, Defining a role for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance, J Vasc Surg, 58, 18, 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.057
Becker, 2006, Dépistage des anévrismes de l’aorte abdominale et surveillance des petits anévrismes de l’aorte abdominale. Argumentaires et recommandations de la Société française de médecine vasculaire, J Mal Vasc, 31, 260, 10.1016/S0398-0499(06)76625-2
Gürtelschmid, 2014, Comparison of three ultrasound method of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta, Br J Surg, 101, 633, 10.1002/bjs.9463
Bredahl, 2013, Volume estimation of the aortic sac after EVAR using 3D ultrasound – a novel, accurate and promising technique, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 45, 450, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.12.018