Stakeholder theory, society and social cohesion

Corporate Governance (Bingley) - 2005
FrançoisLépineux1
1Visiting Research Fellow at CMER, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France. Tel: +33(0)160724128, Fax: +33(0)160724168, E‐mail: [email protected]

Tóm tắt

Stakeholder theory is a “weak” theory, which suffers from a number of flaws. This article is based on the intuition that many of these problems are linked together, and that they are fundamentally due to the fact that stakeholder theory fails to appreciate the place of civil society as a stakeholder. It starts with an examination of the confusing status of society in stakeholder theory, and suggests that civil society should be on top of the stakeholder list. It then underlines the emergence of a global society, distinct from national societies. An extended classification system is presented, which comprises a binary categorization, an intermediate taxonomy, and a developed typology; this system is illustrated in the form of a mapping. The article then addresses the issue of the theory’s normative underpinnings: the concept of social cohesion is proposed as an alternative justification. The meaning of this concept is specified, and its relevance as a normative foundation is justified. Eventually, this reinterpretation of stakeholder theory, which emphasizes the importance of civil society and social cohesion, provides some rationales for the connection of its empirical and normative streams – thus rendering it more consistent and more robust.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Altman, B.W. (1998), “Transformed corporate community relations: a management tool for achieving corporate citizenship”, Business and Society Review, Vol. 102‐3, pp. 43‐52.

Altman, B.W. (2000), “Defining ‘community as stakeholder’ and ‘community stakeholder management’: a theory elaboration study”, in Research in Stakeholder Theory, 1997‐1998, Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics, University of Toronto.

Argandoña, A. (1998), “The stakeholder theory and the common good”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 17 No. 9‐10, pp. 1093‐102.

Bowie, N. (1979), “Changing the rules”, in Beauchamp, T. and Bowie, N. (Eds), Ethical Theory and Business, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 147‐150.

Burke, L., Logsdon, J.M., Mitchell, W., Reiner, M. and Vogel, D. (1986), “Corporate community involvement in the San Francisco Bay area”, California Management Review, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 122‐41.

Burton, B.K. and Dunn, C.P. (1996a), “Stakeholder theory and community groups : a new view”, in Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society held in Santa Fe, NM,21‐24 March, pp. 549‐54.

Burton, B.K. and Dunn, C.P. (1996b), “Feminist ethics as moral grounding for stakeholder theory”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 6 No. 2.

Carroll, A.B. (1991), “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders”, Business Horizons, Vol. 34, pp. 39‐48.

Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995), “A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 92‐117.

Davis, K. (1975), “Five propositions for social responsibility”, Business Horizons, Vol. 18 No. 3, June.

Donaldson, T. (1994), “When integration fails: the logic of prescription and description in business ethics”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 157‐69.

Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, L.E. (1994), “Toward a unified conception of business ethics: integrative social contracts theory”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 252‐84.

Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995), “The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 65‐91.

Etzioni, A. (1992), The Spirit of the Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda, Crown, New York, NY.

Evan, W.M. and Freeman, R.E. (1988), “A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism”, in Beauchamp, T. and Bowie, N. (Eds), Ethical Theory and Business, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 75‐93.

Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach, Pitman Publishing, Boston, MA.

Hess, D., Rogovsky, N. and Dunfee, T.W. (2002), “The next wave of corporate community involvement: corporate social initiatives”, California Management Review, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 110‐25.

Marsden, C. and Mohan, A. (1999), Research on 500 Business Best Practices in Europe, Warwick Business School/European Business Network for Social Cohesion (CSR Europe).

Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J. (1997), “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 853‐86.

Phillips, R.A. (1997), “Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 51‐66.

Rowley, T.J. (1997), “Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, pp. 887‐910.

Smith, C. (1994), “The new corporate philanthropy”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72 No. 3, pp. 105‐16.

Somaya, S. (1996), “Non‐philanthropic corporate involvement in community development”, Business and Society Review, Vol. 97, pp. 32‐8.

Tichy, N.M., McGill, A.R. and St Clair, L. (1997), Corporate Global Citizenship, The New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA.

Tönnies, F. (2001), Community and Civil Society, Cambridge University Press (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, 1st Edition, 1887).

Treviño, L.K. and Weaver, G.R. (1999), “The stakeholder research tradition: converging theorists – not convergent theory”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 222‐7.

Victor, B. and Stephens, C.U. (1994), “Business ethics: a synthesis of normative philosophy and empirical social science”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 145‐55.

Waddock, S.A. and Boyle, M.E. (1995), “The dynamics of change in corporate community relations”, California Management Review, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 125‐40.

Waddock, S.A., Bodwell, C. and Graves, S.B. (2002), “Responsibility: the new business imperative”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 132‐48.

Weaver, G.R. and Treviño, L.K. (1994), “Normative and empirical business ethics: separation, marriage of convenience, or marriage of necessity?”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 129‐43.

Weber, M. (1986), Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, University of California Press (Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 1st Edition, 1921).

Werhane, P. (1994), “The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 175‐80.

Wicks, A.C., Gilbert, D.R. and Freeman, R.E. (1994), “A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 475‐98.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Corporate Governance (Bingley)

Thông tin tác giả