Stakeholder Pressures, Environmental Practice Adoption and Economic Performance in the German Third-party Logistics Industry—A Contingency Perspective

Ambec S, Lanoie P (2008) Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad Manag Perspect 22:45–62 Andersson D, Norrman A (2002) Procurement of logistics services—a minutes work or a multi-year project? Eur J Purch Supply Manag 8:3–14 Aragón-Correa JA (1998) Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Acad Manag J 41:556–567 Aragón-Correa JA, Sharma S (2003) A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad Manag Rev 28:71–88 Barnett ML (2007) Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32:794–816 Barnett ML, Salomon RM (2012) Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strateg Manag J 33:1304–1320 Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17:99–120 Bask AH (2001) Relationships among TPL providers and members of supply chains—a strategic perspective. J Bus Ind Mark 16:470–486 Berglund M, Van Laarhoven P, Sharman G, Wandel S (1999) Third-party logistics: is there a future? Int J Logist Manag 10:59–70 Beuthe M, Gasca J, Greene D et al (2007) Transport and its infrastructure. In: Metz B, Davidson O (eds) Climate change 2007—mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 323–385 Bocquet R, Le Bas C, Mothe C, Poussing N (2013) Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data. Eur Manag J 31:642–654 Branco MC, Rodrigues LL (2006) Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. J Bus Ethics 69:111–132 Busse C (2016) Doing well by doing good? The self-interest of buying firms and sustainable supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manag 52:28–47 Buysse K, Verbeke A (2003) Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strateg Manag J 24:453–470 CapGemini (2016) 2016 third-party logistics study: the state of logistics outsourcing. https://www.fr.capgemini-consulting.com/sites/default/files/resource/pdf/3pl_report-final_reduced_size.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2017 Carroll AB, Shabana KM (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice. Int J Manag Rev 12:85–105 Carter CR, Carter JR (1998) Interorganizational determinants of environmental purchasing: initial evidence from the consumer products industries. Decis Sci 29:659–684 Chang S-J, van Witteloostuijn A, Eden L (2010) From the editors: common method variance in international business research. J Int Bus Stud 41:178–184 Cho JJ-K, Ozment J, Sink H (2008) Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e-commerce market. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 38:336–359 Christmann P (2000) Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Acad Manag J 43:663–680 Claver E, Lopez MD, Molina JF, Tarí JJ (2007) Environmental management and firm performance: a case study. J Environ Manag 84:606–619 Claver-Cortés E, Pertusa-Ortega EM, Molina-Azorín JF (2012) Characteristics of organizational structure relating to hybrid competitive strategy: implications for performance. J Bus Res 65:993–1002 Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159 Colicchia C, Marchet G, Melacini M, Perotti S (2013) Building environmental sustainability: empirical evidence from Logistics Service Providers. J Clean Prod 59:197–209 Cordeiro JJ, Sarkis J (1997) Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Bus Strateg Environ 6:104–114 Craighead CW, Ketchen DJ, Dunn KS, Hult GTM (2011) Addressing common method variance: guidelines for survey research on information technology, operations, and supply chain management. Eng Manag IEEE Trans 58:578–588 Cullinane S, Edwards J (2010) Benefits and costs of switching to alternative fuels. In: McKinnon AC, Cullinane SL, Browne M, Whiteing A (eds) Green logistics: improving the environmental sustainability of logistics. Kogan Page Limited, London, pp 306–321 Dahlmann F, Brammer S, Millington A (2008) Environmental management in the United Kingdom: new survey evidence. Manag Decis 46:264–283 Darnall N, Edwards D (2006) Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: the role of capabilities, resources and ownership structure. Strateg Manag J 27:301–320 Darnall N, Henriques I, Sadorsky P (2010) Adopting proactive environmental strategy: the influence of stakeholders and firm size. J Manag Stud 47:1072–1094 de Bakker F, Nijhof A (2002) Responsible chain management: a capability assessment framework. Bus Strateg Environ 11:63–75 de Winter J, Dodou D, Wieringa P (2009) Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivar Behav Res 44:147–181 Delfmann W, Albers S, Gehring M (2002) The impact of electronic commerce on logistics service providers. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 32:203–222 Delmas MA, Pekovic S (2015) Resource efficiency strategies and market conditions. Long Range Plan 48:80–94 Delmas M, Toffel MW (2004) Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Bus Strateg Environ 13:209–222 Delmas MA, Toffel MW (2008) Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box. Strateg Manag J 29:1027–1055 Delmas M, Hoffmann VH, Kuss M (2011) Under the tip of the iceberg: absorptive capacity, environmental strategy, and competitive advantage. Bus Soc 50:116–154 Dess GG, Robinson RB (1984) Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strateg Manag J 5:265–273 Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer HM (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J Mark Res 38:269–277 Dixon-Fowler HR, Slater DJ, Johnson JL et al (2013) Beyond “does it pay to be green?” A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. J Bus Ethics 112:353–366 Donaldson L (2001) The contingency theory of organizations. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks Eberl M (2010) An application of PLS in multi-group analysis: the need for differentiated corporate-level marketing in the mobile communications industry. In: Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H (eds) Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 487–514 Endrikat J, Guenther E, Hoppe H (2014) Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: a meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. Eur Manag J 32:735–751 Fisher RJ (1993) Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consum Res 20:303–315 Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50 Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. University Press, Cambridge Gadenne DL, Kennedy J, McKeiver C (2009) An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs. J Bus Ethics 84:45–63 Garcés-Ayerbe C, Rivera-Torres P, Murillo-Luna JL (2012) Stakeholder pressure and environmental proactivity: moderating effect of competitive advantage expectations. Manag Decis 50:189–206 Gilley KM, Worrell DL, Davidson WN, El-Jelly A (2000) Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: the differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. J Manag 26:1199–1216 Giunipero LC, Pearcy DH (2000) World-class purchasing skills: an empirical investigation. J Supply Chain Manag 36:4–13 Golicic SL, Smith CD (2013) A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. J Supply Chain Manag 49:78–95 González-Benito J, González-Benito Ó (2006) The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices. Int J Prod Res 44:1353–1373 González-Benito J, González-Benito Ó (2010) A study of determinant factors of stakeholder environmental pressure perceived by industrial companies. Bus Strateg Environ 19:164–181 Graf NFS, Rothlauf F (2012) Firm-NGO collaborations: a resource-based perspective. J Bus Econ 82:103–125 Graf C, Wirl F (2014) Corporate social responsibility: a strategic and profitable response to entry? J Bus Econ 84:917–927 Green KW Jr, Zelbst PJ, Meacham J, Bhadauria VS (2012) Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance. Supply Chain Manag Int J 17:290–305 Grewatsch S, Kleindienst I (2015) When does it pay to be good? Moderators and mediators in the corporate sustainability-corporate financial performance relationship: a critical review. J Bus Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2852-5 Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract 19:139–151 Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2016) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks Hall J, Wagner M (2012) Integrating sustainability into firms’ processes: performance effects and the moderating role of business models and innovation. Bus Strateg Environ 21:183–196 Halldorsson A, Kovács G (2010) The sustainable agenda and energy efficiency: logistics solutions and supply chains in times of climate change. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 40:5–13 Halldorsson A, Skjøtt-Larsen T (2004) Developing logistics competencies through third party logistics relationships. Int J Oper Prod Manag 24:192–206 Halldorsson A, Kotzab H, Mikkola JH, Skjøtt-Larsen T (2007) Complementary theories to supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag Int J 12:284–296 Harman HH (1976) Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manag Rev 20:986–1014 Hart SL, Dowell G (2010) A natural-resource-based view of the firm: fifteen years after. J Manag 37:1464–1479 Henriques I, Sadorsky P (1999) The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Acad Manag J 42:87–99 Henseler J (2012) PLS-MGA: a non-parametric approach to partial least squares-based multi-group analysis. In: Gaul W, Geyer-Schulz A, Schmidt-Thieme L, Kunze J (eds) Challenges at the interface of data analysis, computer science, and optimization. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 495–501 Henseler J, Sarstedt M (2013) Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Comput Stat 28:565–580 Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modelling in international marketing. Adv Int Mark 20:277–319 Hertz S, Alfredsson M (2003) Strategic development of third party logistics providers. Ind Mark Manag 32:139–149 Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg Manag J 20:195–204 Husted BW (2000) A contingency theory of corporate social performance. Bus Soc 39:24–48 Javed M, Rashid MA, Hussain G (2016) When does it pay to be good–a contingency perspective on corporate social and financial performance: would it work? J Clean Prod 133:1062–1073 Kassinis G, Vafeas N (2006) Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Acad Manag J 49:145–159 Kim E, Nam D, Stimpert JL (2004) The applicability of Porter’s generic strategies in the digital age: assumptions, conjectures, and suggestions. J Manag 30:569–589 King AA, Lenox MJ (2001) Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance: an empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. J Ind Ecol 5:105–116 Klassen RD, McLaughlin CP (1996) The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Manage Sci 42:1199–1214 Klassen RD, Whybark DC (1999) The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Acad Manag J 42:599–615 Konar S, Cohen MA (2001) Does the market value environmental performance? Rev Econ Stat 83:281–289 Kumar K, Subramanian R (1997) Porter’s strategic types: differences in internal processes and their impact on performance. J Appl Bus Res 14:107–124 Lankoski L (2008) Corporate responsibility activities and economic performance: a theory of why and how they are connected. Bus Strateg Environ 17:536–547 Leuschner R, Carter CR, Goldsby TJ, Rogers ZS (2014) Third-party logistics: a meta-analytic review and investigation of its impact on performance. J Supply Chain Manag 50:21–43 Lieb RC (1992) The use of third-party logistics services by large American manufacturers. J Bus Logist 13:29–42 Lieb KJ, Lieb RC (2010) Environmental sustainability in the third-party logistics (3PL) industry. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 40:524–533 Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol 86:114–121 Litz RA (1996) A resource-based-view of the socially responsible firm: stakeholder interdependence, ethical awareness, and issue responsiveness as strategic assets. J Bus Ethics 15:1355–1363 Maas S, Schuster T, Hartmann E (2014) Pollution prevention and service stewardship strategies in the third-party logistics industry: effects on firm differentiation and the moderating role of environmental communication. Bus Strateg Environ 23:38–55 Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A (2006) Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manag Sci 52:1865–1883 Marasco A (2008) Third-party logistics: a literature review. Int J Prod Econ 113:127–147 McCarthy-Byrne TM, Mentzer JT (2011) Integrating supply chain infrastructure and process to create joint value. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 41:135–161 McKinnon A (2010) Environmental sustainability: a new priority for logistics managers. In: Cullinane S, Brown M, Whiteing A (eds) Green logistics: improving the environmental sustainability of logistics. Kogan Page Limited, London, pp 3–30 Meixell MJ, Luoma P (2015) Stakeholder pressure in sustainable supply chain management. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 45:69–89 Meznar MB, Nigh D (1995) Buffer or bridge? Environmental and organizational determinants of public affairs activities in American firms. Acad Manag J 38:975–996 Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22:853–886 Murillo-Luna JL, Garcés-Ayerbe C, Rivera-Torres P (2008) Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders’ pressure approach. Strateg Manag J 29:1225–1240 Newbert SL (2007) Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strateg Manag J 28:121–146 Nunally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychonometric theory. McGraw-Hill Publishers, New York Oberhofer P, Dieplinger M (2014) Sustainability in the transport and logistics sector: lacking environmental measures. Bus Strateg Environ 23:236–253 Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud 24:403–441 Paulraj A (2011) Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability. J Supply Chain Manag 47:19–37 Pertusa-Ortega EM, Molina-Azorín JF, Claver-Cortés E (2009) Competitive strategies and firm performance: a comparative analysis of pure, hybrid and “stuck-in-the-middle” strategies in Spanish firms. Br J Manag 20:508–523 Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12:531–544 Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879–903 Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118 Prockl G, Pflaum A, Kotzab H (2012) 3PL factories or lernstatts? Value-creation models for 3PL service providers. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 42:544–561 Rao P, Singh AK, la O’Castillo O et al (2009) A metric for corporate environmental indicators… for small and medium enterprises in the Philippines. Bus Strateg Environ 18:14–31 Reinartz W, Haenlein M, Henseler J (2009) An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. Int J Res Mark 26:332–344 Reuter C, Foerstl K, Hartmann E, Blome C (2010) Sustainable global supplier management: the role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. J Supply Chain Manag 46:45–63 Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker J-M (2015) SmartPLS 3 Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com. Accessed 2 Jan 2017 Rueda-Manzanares A, Aragón-Correa JA, Sharma S (2008) The influence of stakeholders on the environmental strategy of service firms: the moderating effects of complexity, uncertainty and munificence. Br J Manag 19:185–203 Ruhnke K, Gabriel A (2013) Determinants of voluntary assurance on sustainability reports: an empirical analysis. J Bus Econ 83:1063–1091 Russo MV, Fouts PA (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40:534–559 Sahay BS, Halldorsson A, Skjøtt-Larsen T (2006) Dynamics of relationship governance in TPL arrangements-a dyadic perspective. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 36:490–506 Sarkis J, Gonzalez-Torre P, Adenso-Diaz B (2010) Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. J Oper Manag 28:163–176 Sarstedt M, Henseler J, Ringle CM (2011) Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: alternative methods and empirical results. Adv Int Mark 22:195–218 Scherer AG, Palazzo G, Seidl D (2013) Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: sustainable development in a globalized world. J Manag Stud 50:259–284 Schoenherr T, Modi SB, Talluri S, Hult GTM (2014) Antecedents and performance outcomes of strategic environmental sourcing: an investigation of resource-based process and contingency effects. J Bus Logist 35:172–190 Selviaridis K, Spring M (2007) Third party logistics: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Logist Manag 18:125–150 Sharma S (2000) Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad Manag J 43:681–697 Sharma S, Henriques I (2005) Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strateg Manag J 26:159–180 Sharma S, Aragón-Correa JA, Rueda-Manzanares A (2007) The contingent influence of organizational capabilities on proactive environmental strategy in the service sector: an analysis of North American and European ski resorts. Can J Adm Sci Can des Sci l’Administration 24:268–283 Sink HL, Langley CJ Jr (1997) A managerial framework for the acquisition of third-party logistics services. J Bus Logist 18:163–190 Söllner A (2014) Globalization, greed, and exploitation. How to break the baleful path? J Bus Econ 84:1211–1235 Sprengel DC, Busch T (2011) Stakeholder engagement and environmental strategy—the case of climate change. Bus Strateg Environ 20:351–364 Stanwick PA, Stanwick SD (1998) The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: an empirical examination. J Bus Ethics 17:195–204 Sum C-C, Teo C-B (1999) Strategic posture of logistics service providers in Singapore. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 29:588–605 Surroca J, Tribó JA, Waddock S (2010) Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strateg Manag J 31:463–490 Tosi HL, Slocum JW (1984) Contingency theory: some suggested directions. J Manag 10:9–26 Touboulic A, Walker H (2015) Theories in sustainable supply chain management: a structured literature review. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 45:16–42 Turban DB, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad Manag J 40:658–672 Van de Ven AH, Ganco M, Hinings CR (2013) Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. Acad Manag Ann 7:393–440 Van Wassenhove LN, Besiou M (2013) Complex problems with multiple stakeholders: how to bridge the gap between reality and OR/MS? J Bus Econ 83:87–97 Wagner M (2010) The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: a firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecol Econ 69:1553–1560 Wagner M (2011) Corporate performance implications of extended stakeholder management: new insights on mediation and moderation effects. Ecol Econ 70:942–950 Wagner M (2015) The link of environmental and economic performance: drivers and limitations of sustainability integration. J Bus Res 68:1306–1317 Wagner SM, Kemmerling R (2010) Handling nonresponse in logistics research. J Bus Logist 31:357–381 Wagner SM, Rau C, Lindemann E (2010) Multiple informant methodology: a critical review and recommendations. Sociol Methods Res 38:582–618 Wang Q, Dou J, Jia S (2015) A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance the moderating effect of contextual factors. Bus Soc 55:1083–1121 Whiteman G, Walker B, Perego P (2013) Planetary boundaries: ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. J Manag Stud 50:307–336 Wolf C, Seuring S (2010) Environmental impacts as buying criteria for third party logistical services. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 40:84–102 Zhao M, Dröge C, Stank TP (2001) The effects of logistics capabilities on firm performance: customer-focused versus information-focused capabilities. J Bus Logist 22:91–107 Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J Oper Manag 22:265–289