Sprinkler Irrigation Efficiency in Relation to Water Surface Tension: Pesticide and Fertilizer Effect on Drop Size and Soil Water Uptake

WATER CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING - Tập 7 - Trang 173-181 - 2022
Azam Keneti1, Davood Farsadizadeh1, Yadollah Bahramian2, Aliyar Javadi3
1Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
2Khazar Exploration and Production Company, Tehran, Iran
3Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Tóm tắt

Increasing pressure on water resources in semi-arid regions is forcing farmers to use more effective pressurized water application. Sprinkler irrigation efficiency is directly related to the droplet size, which its contributing factors have mostly been studied macroscopically (e.g., nozzle size, flow pressure). As a result, the importance of microscopic phenomena such as molecular interactions in water drop formation has been overlooked. In this study, the role of surface tension in water atomization has been investigated. Using drop volume method, two conventional surfactants, hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and two commercial fertilizers and pesticides have been employed to investigate the mechanisms via which dissolved materials can affect the water drop size during atomization. Experimental results from this study revealed the commercial fertilizers and pesticides can significantly reduce the surface tension of water and, therefore, size of water droplets (up to 60%). It is also identified that flow rate is a critical factor affecting droplet size when commercial fertilizers and pesticides are present in the system. Furthermore, it was found that fertilizers and pesticides can reduce overall soil water adsorption up to 10%. Consideration of these outcomes in the design of sprinkle irrigation systems can substantially improve water conservation and the environmental sustainability in the areas adversely affected by global warming.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Al-Ghobari HM, El-Marazky MS, Dewidar AZ, Mattar MA (2018) Prediction of wind drift and evaporation losses from sprinkler irrigation using neural network and multiple regression techniques. Agric Water Manag 195:211–221 Andrés R, Cuchí JA (2014) Analysis of sprinkler irrigation management in the LASESA district, Monegros (Spain). Agric Water Manag 131:95–107 Astiz M, Alaniz MJTd, Marra CA (2009) Effect of pesticides on cell survival in liver and brain rat tissues. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 72(7):2025–2032 Baifus Manke E, Nörenberg BG, Faria LC, Tarjuelo JM, Colombo A, Chagas Neta MCC, Parfitt JMB (2019) Wind drift and evaporation losses of a mechanical lateral-move irrigation system: oscillating plate versus fixed spray plate sprinklers. Agric Water Manag 225:105759 Bahramian Y, Bahramian A, Javadi A (2017) Confined fluids in clay interlayers: a simple method for density and abnormal pore pressure interpretation. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 521:260–271 Biswas SC, Dubreil L, Marion D (2001) Interfacial behavior of wheat puroindolines: study of adsorption at the air–water interface from surface tension measurement using Wilhelmy plate method. J Colloid Interface Sci 244(2):245–253 Borysenko A, Clennell B, Sedev R, Burgar I, Ralston J, Raven M, Dewhurst D and Liu K (2009) Experimental investigations of the wettability of clays and shales. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005928 Chi D (2010) Irrigation and drainage. Chapter 3 Irrigation Techniques. 41–5. ISBN 978–7–5084–7279–9 Dwomoh FA, Shouqi Y, Hong L (2014) Droplet size characterization of the new type complete fluidic sprinkler. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng 11(4):70–73 Edling RJ (1985) Kinetic energy, evaporation and wind drift of droplets from low pressure irrigation nozzles. Trans ASAE 28(5):1543–1550 Fernando WAM, Ilankoon IMSK, Chong MN, Syed TH (2018) Effects of intermittent liquid addition on heap hydrodynamics. Miner Eng 124:108–115 Grubelnik V, Marhl M (2005) Drop formation in a falling stream of liquid. Am J Phys 73(5):415–419 Harkins WD, Jordan HF (1930) A method for the determination of surface and interfacial tension from the maximum pull on a ring. J Am Chem Soc 52(5):1751–1772 Israelachvili JN (2011) Intermolecular and surface forces. Academic Press, Cambridge Ivanov SP, Ibragimov IG, Bondar’ KE, Ivanov OS (2015) Experimental installation for studying hydroaerothermal characteristics of sprinklers and water traps of cooling towers. Chem Pet Eng 51(1–2):3–5 Javadi A, Bastani D, Krägel J, Miller M (2009) Interfacial instability of growing drop: experimental study and conceptual analysis. Colloids Surf, A 347(1–3):167–174 Javadi A, Krägel J, Makievski AV, Kovalchuk VI, Kovalchuk NM, Mucic N, Logliod G, Pandolfini P, Karbaschi M, Miller M (2012) Fast dynamic interfacial tension measurements and dilational rheology of interfacial layers by using the capillary pressure technique. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 407:159–168 Javadi A, Krägel J, Pandolfini P, Loglio G, Kovalchuk AI, Aksenenko EVEV, Ravera F, Liggieri L, Miller R (2010) Short time dynamic interfacial tension as studied by the growing drop capillary pressure technique. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 365:62–69 Jovanovic N, Pereira LS, Paredes P, Pôças I, Cantore V, Todorovic M (2020) A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods. Agric Water Manag 239:106267 Kryukova EN, Sister VG, Rustambekov MK, Ivannikova EM (2015) Effect of surface tension on droplet size during liquid dispersion by a centrifugal atomizer. Chem Pet Eng 50(11–12):766–769 L Daly G, Lei YD, Teixeria C, Derek MCG, Wania F (2007) Pesticides in western Canadian mountain air and soil. Environmental Science and Technology 41:6020–6025 Lewan E, Kreuger J, Jarvis N (2009) Implications of precipitation patterns and antecedent soil water content for leaching of pesticides from arable land. Agric Water Manag 96(11):1633–1640 Mandato S, Rondet E, Delaplace G, Barkouti A, Galet L, Accart P, Ruiz T, Cuq B (2012) Liquids’ atomization with two different nozzles: modeling of the effects of some processing and formulation conditions by dimensional analysis. Powder Technol 224:323–330 Marshall AW, di Marzo M (2004) Modelling aspects of sprinkler spray dynamics in fires. Process Saf Environ Prot 82(2):97–104 Ouellet-Plamondon CM, Stasiak J, Al-Tabbaa A (2014) The effect of cationic, non-ionic and amphiphilic surfactants on the intercalation of bentonite. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 444:330–337 Prostański D (2013) Use of air-and-water spraying systems for improving dust control in mines. J Sustain Mining 12(2):29–34 Sanchez I, Faci JM, Zapata N (2011) The effects of pressure, nozzle diameter and meteorological conditions on the performance of agricultural impact sprinklers. Agric Water Manag 102(1):13–24 Schrader, M. E. and G. I. Leoeb (1992) Modern approaches to wettability: theory and applications, Springer Science, Berlin/Heidelberg Sposito G (2008) The chemistry of soils. Oxford University Press, Oxford Stauffer CE (1965) The measurement of surface tension by the pendant drop technique. J Phys Chem 69(6):1933–1938 Stevenin C, Vallet A, Tomas S, Amielh M, Anselmet F (2016) Eulerian atomization modeling of a pressure-atomized spray for sprinkler irrigation. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 57:142–149 Sun Z, Kang Y, Jiang S (2008) Effects of water application intensity, drop size and water application amount on the characteristics of topsoil pores under sprinkler irrigation. Agric Water Manag 95(7):869–876 Tarantino A, De Col E (2008) Compaction behaviour of clay. Géotechnique 58(3):199–213 Tornberg E (1997) A surface tension apparatus according to the drop volume principle. J Colloid Interface Sci 60(1):50–53 Winterkorn H, Baver LD (1935) Sorption of liquid by soil colloids: I. Liquid intake and swelling by soil colloidal materials. Soil Sci 40(5):403–420 Xu H, Li PX, Ma K, Thomas RK, Penfold J, Lu JR (2013) Limitations in the application of the Gibbs equation to anionic surfactants at the air/water surface: sodium dodecyl sulfate and sodium dodecylmonooxyethylenesulfate above and below the CMC. Langmuir 29(30):9335–9351