Specificity and Engagement: Increasing ELSI’s Relevance to Nano–Scientists
Tóm tắt
Scholars studying the ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) associated with emerging technologies maintain the importance of considering these issues throughout the research and development cycle, even during the earliest stages of basic research. Embedding these considerations within the scientific process requires communication between ELSI scholars and the community of physical scientists who are conducting that basic research. We posit that this communication can be effective on a broad scale only if it links societal issues directly to characteristics of the emerging technology that are relevant to the physical and natural scientists involved in research and development. In this article, we examine nano-ELSI literature from 2003 to 2010 to discern the degree to which it makes these types of explicit connections. We find that, while the literature identifies a wide range of issues of societal concern, it generally does so in a non-specific manner. It neither links societal issues to particular forms or characteristics of widely divergent nanotechnologies nor to any of the many potential uses to which those nanotechnologies may be put. We believe that these kinds of specificity are essential to those engaged in nano-scale research. We also compare the literature-based findings to observations from interviews we conducted with nanoscientists and conclude that ELSI scholars should add technical- and application-related forms of specificity to their work and their writings to enhance effectiveness and impact in communicating with one important target audience—members of the nanoscale science community.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Collins H, Evans R (2007) Rethinking expertise. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Collins H, Evans R, Gorman ME et al (2010) Trading zones and interactional expertise. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and international expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 7–23
Doom N, Schuurbiers D, van de Poel I (2013) Early engagement and new technologies: opening up the laboratory. In: Gorman ME (ed) Philosophy of engineering and technology, 16th edn. Springer, Dordrecht
Fisher E (2007) Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. NanoEthics 1(2):155–165
Fisher E, Mahajan RL, Mitcham C (2006) Midstream modulation of technology: Governance from within. Bull Sci Technol Soc 26:485–496
Flipse SM, van der Sanden MCA, Osseweijer P (2013) Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: Redefining what is ‘part of the job’ of researchers in industry. Sci Eng Ethics 19:1141–1164
Guston DH, Sarewitz D (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Technol Soc 24:93–109
Jia G, Wang H, Yan L, Wang X, Pei R, Yan T, Zhao Y, Guo X (2005) Cytotoxicity of carbon nanomaterials: Single-wall nanotube, multi-wall nanotube, and fullerene. Environ Sci Technol 39:1378–1383
Johansson MJ (2008) Next to nothing: a study of nanoscientists and their cosmology at a Swedish research laboratory. University of Gothenburg, Goteborg
Mody CCM (2011) Instrumental community: probe microscopy and the path to nanotechnology. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Pandza K, Ellwood P (2013) Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42:1112–1125
Schuurbiers D (2011) What happens in the lab: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory. Sci Eng Ethics 17:769–788
Shapira P, Youtie J, Porter AL (2010) The emergence of social science research on nanotechnology. Scientometrics 85:595–611
Tait J (2009) Upstream engagement and the governance of science: the shadow of the genetically modified crops experience in Europe. EMBO Reports, Vol. 10, Special Issue, European Molecular Biology Organization
Wilsdon J, Willis R (2004) See-through science: why public engagement needs to move upstream. Demos, London