Speaking in noise: How does the Lombard effect improve acoustic contrasts between speech and ambient noise?
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Amazi, 1982, The Lombard sign as a function of age and task, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 25, 581, 10.1044/jshr.2504.581
Arons, 1992, A review of the cocktail party effect, J. Amer. Voice I/O Soc., 12, 35
Assmann, 1990, Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 88, 680, 10.1121/1.399772
Boike, 2000, Effect of compression ratio on speech recognition and speech-quality ratings with wide dynamic range compression amplification, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 43, 456, 10.1044/jslhr.4302.456
Boril, 2005, Design and collection of Czech Lombard database, 1577
Bradlow, 1996, Intelligibility of normal speech I: global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics, Sp. Commun., 20, 255, 10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00063-5
Brown, 1983
Brungart, 2001, Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 109, 1101, 10.1121/1.1345696
Castellanos, 1996, An analysis of general acoustic-phonetic features for Spanish speech produced with the Lombard effect, Sp. Commun., 20, 23, 10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00042-8
Culling, 1993, Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93, 3454, 10.1121/1.405675
Darwin, 1981, Perceptual grouping of speech components differing in fundamental frequency and onset-time, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 1981, 185, 10.1080/14640748108400785
Darwin, 2003, Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 114, 2913, 10.1121/1.1616924
Dreher, 1957, Effects of ambient noise on speaker intelligibility for words and phrases, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 29, 1320, 10.1121/1.1908780
Egan, 1972, Psychoacoustics of the Lombard voice response, J. Aud. Res., 12, 318
French, 1947, Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 19, 90, 10.1121/1.1916407
Garnier, 2008, May speech modifications in noise contribute to enhance audio-visible cues to segment perception?, 95
Garnier, 2006, The Lombard effect: a physiological reflex or a controlled intelligibility enhancement?, 255-262
Garnier, 2010, Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction on the Lombard effect, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 53, 588, 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0138)
Hornsby, 2001, The effects of compression ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and level on speech recognition in normal-hearing listeners, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 109, 2964, 10.1121/1.1369105
Horwitz, 2008, Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 51, 798, 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/057)
Ishizuka, 2002, Effect of F0 fluctuation and amplitude modulation of natural vowels on vowel identification in noisy environments, 1633-1636
Jesteadt, 1977, Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 61, 169, 10.1121/1.381278
Junqua, 1993, The Lombard reflex and it role on human listener and automatic speech recognizers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 93, 510, 10.1121/1.405631
Jung, 2012, On the Lombard effect induced by vehicle interior driving noises, regarding sound pressure level and long-term average speech spectrum, Acta Acust. United Acust., 98, 334, 10.3813/AAA.918517
Junqua, 1998, Influence of the speaking style and the noise spectral tilt on the lombard reflex and automatic speech recognition
Kadiri, 1998
Krause, 2004, Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 115, 362, 10.1121/1.1635842
Laures, 1999, The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 42, 1148, 10.1044/jslhr.4205.1148
Lienard, 1999, Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 106, 411, 10.1121/1.428140
Lu, 2008, Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 124, 3261, 10.1121/1.2990705
Lu, 2009, The contribution of changes in F0 and spectral tilt to increased intelligibility of speech produced in noise, Sp. Commun., 51, 1253, 10.1016/j.specom.2009.07.002
Lu, 2009, Speech production modifications produced in the presence of low-pass and high-pass filtered noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 126, 1495, 10.1121/1.3179668
Marin, 1991, Segregation of concurrent sounds II: effects of spectral envelope tracing, frequency modulation coherence, and frequency modulation width, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 89, 341, 10.1121/1.400469
Mokbel, 1992
Picheny, 1986, Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech, J. Speech Hear. Res., 29, 434, 10.1044/jshr.2904.434
Pittman, 2001, Recognition of speech produced in noise, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res., 44, 487, 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/038)
Rostolland, 1982, Phonetic structure of shouted voice, Acta Acust., 51, 80
Schulman, 1989, Articulatory dynamics of loud and normal speech, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 85, 295, 10.1121/1.397737
Skowronski, 2006, Applied principles of clear and Lombard speech for automated intelligibility enhancement in noisy environments, Sp. Commun., 48, 549, 10.1016/j.specom.2005.09.003
Stanton, 1988, Acoustics-phonetic analysis of loud and Lombard speech in simulated cockpit conditions, 331
Sundberg, 2006, Effects of vocal loudness variation on spectrum balance as reflected by the alpha measure of long-term-average spectra of speech, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 120, 453, 10.1121/1.2208451
Ternström, 2002, Cancellation of simulated environmental noise as a tool for measuring vocal performance during noise exposure, J. Voice, 16, 195, 10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00089-9
Titze, 1989, On the relation between subglottal pressure and fundamental frequency in phonation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 85, 901, 10.1121/1.397562
Titze, 1992, Vocal intensity in speakers and singers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 91, 2936, 10.1121/1.402929
Traumüller, 2000, Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 107, 3438, 10.1121/1.429414
Van Summers, 1988, Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 84, 917, 10.1121/1.396660
Welby, 2006, Intonational differences in Lombard speech: looking beyond F0 range, 763
Wier, 1977, Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 61, 178, 10.1121/1.381251
Zeiliger, 1994, BD_Bruit, une base de données de parole de locuteurs soumis à du bruit [BD_Bruit, a database of speakers exposed to noise], 287