Spatially Explicit Analysis of Trade-Offs and Synergies among Multiple Ecosystem Services in Shaanxi Valley Basins

Forests - Tập 11 Số 2 - Trang 209
Yijie Sun1, Jing Li1, Xianfeng Liu1, Zhiyuan Ren1, Zixiang Zhou2, Yifang Duan1
1School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China
2College of Geomatics, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China

Tóm tắt

Understanding the spatiotemporal characteristics of trade-offs and synergies among multiple ecosystem services (ESs) is the basis of sustainable ecosystem management. The ecological environment of valley basins is very fragile, while bearing the enormous pressure of economic development and population growth, which has damaged the balance of the ecosystem structure and ecosystem services. In this study, we selected two typical valley basins—Guanzhong Basin and Hanzhong Basin—as study areas. The spatial heterogeneity of trade-offs and synergies among multiple ESs (net primary production (NPP), habitat quality (HQ), soil conservation (SC), water conservation (WC), and food supply (FS)) were quantified using the correlation analysis and spatial overlay based on the gird scale to quantitatively analyze and compare the interaction among ESs in two basins. Our results found that: (1) Trade-offs between FS and other four services NPP, HQ, SC, and WC were discovered in two basins, and there were synergistic relationships between NPP, HQ, SC, and WC. (2) From 2000 to 2018, the conflicted relationships between paired ESs gradually increased, and the synergistic relationship became weaker. Furthermore, the rate of change in Guanzhong Basin was stronger than that in Hanzhong Basin. (3) The spatial synergies and trade-offs between NPP and HQ, WC and NPP, FS and HQ, SC and FS were widespread in two basins. The strong trade-offs between pair ESs were widly distributed in the central and southwest of Guanzhong Basin and the southeast of Hanzhong Basin. (4) Multiple ecosystem service interactions were concentrated in the north of Qinling Mountain, the central of Guanzhong Basins, and the east of Hanzhong Basin. Our research highlights the importance of taking spatial perspective and accounting for multiple ecosystem service interactions, and provide a reliable basis for achieving ecological sustainable development of the valley basin.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Costanza, 1997, The value of the world’ s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 25, 3

Liu, 2017, Changes in land-uses and ecosystem services under multi-scenarios simulation, Sci. Total Environ., 586, 522, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.005

Costanza, 2017, Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?, Ecosyst. Serv., 28, 1, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008

Li, 2018, Spatio-temporal quantification of the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services based on grid-cells: A case study of Guanzhong Basin, NW China, Ecol. Indic., 94, 246, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.069

Li, 2013, The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography, Geogr. Res., 32, 1379

Briner, 2013, Trade-offs between ecosystem services in a mountain region, Ecol. Soc., 18, 35, 10.5751/ES-05576-180335

Bennett, 2009, Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services, Ecol. Let., 12, 1394, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x

Turkelboom, F., Thoonen, M., Jacobs, S., García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., and Berry, P. (2016, January 16). Ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies (draft). Available online: www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book.

Tilman, 2002, Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices, Nature, 418, 671, 10.1038/nature01014

Han, Z., Song, W., Deng, X., and Xu, X. (2017). Trade-Offs and Synergies in Ecosystem service within the Three-Rivers Headwater Region, China. Water, 9.

Fu, 2018, Scenario analysis of ecosystem service changes and interactions in a mountain-oasis-desert system: A case study in Altay Prefecture, China, Sci. Rep. UK, 8, 12939, 10.1038/s41598-018-31043-y

Torralba, 2018, A social-ecological analysis of ecosystem services supply and trade-offs in European wood-pastures, Sci. Adv., 4, 2176, 10.1126/sciadv.aar2176

Ament, 2017, Cultural ecosystem services in protected areas: Understanding bundles, trade-offs, and synergies, Conserv. Lett., 10, 440, 10.1111/conl.12283

Cord, 2017, Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead, Ecosyst. Serv., 28, 264, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012

Bai, 2011, Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed, Ecol. Complex., 8, 177, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.01.007

Howe, 2014, Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world, Glob. Environ. Chang., 28, 263, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005

Plieninger, 2019, Perceived ecosystem services synergies, trade-offs, and bundles in European high nature value farming landscapes, Landscape Ecol., 34, 1565, 10.1007/s10980-019-00775-1

Peterson, 2010, Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 5242, 10.1073/pnas.0907284107

Demestihas, 2019, A simulation study of synergies and tradeoffs between multiple ecosystem services in apple orchards, J. Environ. Manag., 236, 1, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.073

Wang, 2018, Projections of future land use changes: Multiple scenarios-based impacts analysis on ecosystem services for Wuhan city, China, Ecol. Indic., 94, 430, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.047

Grasso, 1998, Ecological–economic model for optimal mangrove trade-off between forestry and fishery production: Comparing a dynamic optimization and a simulation model, Ecol. Model., 112, 131, 10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00076-3

Seppelt, 2013, Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: A plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales Ralf Seppelt1, Sven Lautenbach2 and Martin Volk1, Curr. Opin. Env. Sust., 5, 458, 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.002

Bohensky, 2006, Conservation in practice: Future ecosystem services in a Southern African River Basin: A scenario planning approach to uncertainty, Conserv. Biol., 20, 1051, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00475.x

Gong, 2019, Tradeoffs/synergies of multiple ecosystem services based on land use simulation in a mountain-basin area, western China, Ecol. Indic., 99, 283, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.027

Zheng, 2014, A method to identify the variable ecosystem services relationship across time: A case study on Yanhe Basin, China, Landscape Ecol., 29, 1689, 10.1007/s10980-014-0088-x

Zhang, 2019, Optimal protected area selection: Based on multiple attribute decision making method and ecosystem service research—Illustrated by Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region section of the Weihe River Basin, Sci. Agric. Sin., 52, 2114

Peng, 2019, Simulating the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services trade-offs in Northwestern Yunnan, China, Ecosyst. Serv., 39, 100998, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100998

Qin, 2019, Setting conservation priorities based on ecosystem services - A case study of the Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region, Sci. Total Environ., 650, 3062, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.305

Hadian, 2019, Estimation of spatial and temporal changes in net primary production based on Carnegie Ames Stanford Approach (CASA) model in semi-arid rangelands of Semirom County, Iran, J. Arid Land., 11, 477, 10.1007/s40333-019-0060-3

Potter, 1993, Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data, Global Biogeochem Cy., 7, 811, 10.1029/93GB02725

Loreau, 2001, Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges, Science, 294, 804, 10.1126/science.1064088

Hector, 2007, Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality, Nature, 448, 188, 10.1038/nature05947

Hou, 2017, Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of ecosystem service interactions: A case study on the central Loess Plateau of China, Landscape Ecol., 32, 1201, 10.1007/s10980-017-0497-8

Asadolahi, 2018, Dynamic trade-off analysis of multiple ecosystem services under land use change scenarios: Towards putting ecosystem services into planning in Iran, Ecol. Complex., 36, 250, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2018.09.003

Bao, 2015, Effects of land use change on habitat based on InVEST model: Taking yellow river wetland nature reserve in Shaanxi province as an example, Arid Zone Res., 32, 622

Biao, 2010, Water conservation of forest ecosystem in Beijing and its value, Ecol. Econ., 69, 1416, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.004

Li, 2008, Spatiotemporal change of water conservation value of Loess Plateau ecosystem in northern Shaanxi Province, Chin. J. Ecol., 27, 240

Shi, 2004, Soil conservation planning at the small watershed level using RUSLE with GIS: A case study in the Three Gorge Area of China, CATENA, 55, 33, 10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00088-2

Liu, 2000, Slope length effects on soil loss for steep slopes, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1759, 10.2136/sssaj2000.6451759x

Yang, 2016, Trade-offs between carbon sequestration, soil retention and water yield in the Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region of China, J. Geogr. Sci., 26, 1449, 10.1007/s11442-016-1337-5

Power, 2010, Ecosystem services and agriculture: Tradeoffs and synergies, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 365, 2959, 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143

Sun, 2017, Spatial and temporal changing analysis of synergy and trade-off between ecosystem services in valley basins of Shaanxi Province, Acta Geogr. Sin., 72, 521

Zhu, Y., Zhongke, F., Lu, J., and Liu, J. (2020). Estimation of forest biomass in Beijing (China) using multisource remote sensing and forest inventory data. Forest, 11.

Qiao, 2019, Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of the trade-offs and synergies among multiple ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China, Sci. Total Environ., 651, 218, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.135

Fan, 2020, Impacts of the grain for Green Program on the spatial pattern of land uses and ecosystem services in mountainous settlements in southwest China, Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 21, e806

Xu, 2017, Scale effect on spatial patterns of ecosystem services and associations among them in semi-arid area: A case study in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China, Sci. Total Environ., 598, 297, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.009

Li, S., Bing, Z., and Jin, G. (2019). Spatially explicit mapping of soil conservation service in monetary units due to land use/cover change for the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Remote Sens. (Basel), 11.

Bennett, 2014, Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem, Ecol. Soc., 19, 20, 10.5751/ES-06249-190120

Yi, 2018, Spatial and temporal changes in biodiversity and ecosystem services in the San Antonio River Basin, Texas, from 1984 to 2010, Sci. Total Environ., 619–620, 1259, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.302

Li, 2019, Bundling ecosystem services for detecting their interactions driven by large-scale vegetation restoration: Enhanced services while depressed synergies, Ecol. Indic., 99, 332, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.041

Fu, 2017, Effects of land use and climate change on ecosystem services in Central Asia’s arid regions: A case study in Altay Prefecture, China, Sci. Total Environ., 607–608, 633, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.241

Aurenhammer, P.K. (2020). Nudging in the Forests—the Role and Effectiveness of NEPIs in Government Forest Initiatives of Bavaria. Forests, 11.