Spatial attention and conscious perception: the role of endogenous and exogenous orienting

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics - Tập 73 - Trang 1065-1081 - 2011
Ana B. Chica1, Stefano Lasaponara2,3, Lorena Chanes1,4, Antoni Valero-Cabré5,6,7, Fabrizio Doricchi2,3, Juan Lupiáñez8, Paolo Bartolomeo1,9,10
1INSERM-UPMC UMR-S 975, Paris, France
2Department of Psychology, University of La Sapienza, Roma, Italy
3Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy
4École des Neurosciences de Paris, Paris, France
5Laboratory for Cerebral Dynamics Plasticity & Rehabilitation, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA
6Cognitive Neuroscience and Information Technology Research Program, Open University of Catalonia (UOC), Barcelona, Spain
7CNRS UMR 7225-CRICM, Paris, France
8Departamento de Psicología Experimental y Fisiología del Comportamiento, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
9Department of Psychology, Catholic University, Milan, Italy
10AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Fédération de Neurologie, Paris, France

Tóm tắt

Attention has often been considered to be a gateway to consciousness (Posner, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91(16), 7398–7403, 1994). However, its relationship with conscious perception (CP) remains highly controversial. While theoretical models and experimental data support the role of attention in CP (Chica, Lasaponara, Lupiáñez, Doricchi, & Bartolomeo, NeuroImage, 51, 1205–1212, 2010; Dehaene, Changeux, Naccache, Sackur, & Sergent, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204–211, 2006; Mack & Rock, Inattentional blindness, 1998), recent studies have claimed that at least some forms of attention—endogenous or top-down spatial attention—are neither sufficient nor necessary for CP (Koch & Tsuchiya, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 16–22, 2007). In the present experiments, we demonstrate the importance of exogenously triggered attention for the modulation of CP. Weak or null effects were instead observed when attention was triggered endogenously. Our data are discussed in the framework of recent neuropsychological models (Dehaene et al., Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204–211, 2006), postulating that activity within reverberating frontoparietal networks, as colocalized with spatial--orienting systems, is the brain correlate of consciously processed information.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bartolomeo, P. (2007). Visual neglect. Current Opinion in Neurology, 20, 381–386. Bartolomeo, P. (2008). Varieties of attention and of consciousness: Evidence from neuropsychology. Psyche, 14(1) Bartolomeo, P., & Dalla Barba, G. (2002). Varieties of consciousness (commentary on Perruchet and Vinter: The self-organizing consciousness). The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 331–332. Bartolomeo, P., Thiebaut de Schotten, M., & Doricchi, F. (2007). Left unilateral neglect as a disconnection syndrome. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2479–2490. Berger, A., Henik, A., & Rafal, R. (2005). Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 207–221. Botta, F., Santangelo, V., Raffone, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Belardinelli, M. O. (2010). Exogenous and endogenous spatial attention effects on visuospatial working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1–13. Buschman, T. J., & Miller, E. K. (2007). Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science, 315, 1860–1862. Chica, A. B., Bartolomeo, P., & Valero-Cabré, A. (2011). Dorsal and ventral parietal contributions to spatial orienting in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience. Chica, A. B., Charras, P., & Lupiáñez, J. (2008). Endogenous attention and illusory line motion depend on task set. Vision Research, 48, 2251–2259. Chica, A. B., Lasaponara, S., Lupiáñez, J., Doricchi, F., & Bartolomeo, P. (2010). Exogenous attention can capture perceptual consciousness: ERP and behavioural evidence. Neuroimage, 51, 1205–1212. Chica, A. B., Lupiáñez, J., & Bartolomeo, P. (2006). Dissociating inhibition of return from the endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1015–1034. Christie, J., & Klein, R. M. (2005). Does attention cause illusory line motion? Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1032–1043. Chun, M. M., & Marois, R. (2002). The dark side of visual attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 184–189. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 3, 201–215. Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 328–334. Dehaene, S., Changeux, J. P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204–211. Dehaene, S., & Naccache, L. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1–37. Doricchi, F., Macci, E., Silvetti, M., & Macaluso, E. (2010). Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the posner task. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 1574–1585. Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. (2007). Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1488–1497. Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. (2008). The spatiotemporal profile of cortical processing leading up to visual perception. Journal of Vision, 8(1, Art. 12), 11–12. Funes, M. J., Lupiáñez, J., & Milliken, B. (2007). Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: Evidence from a spatial stroop paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 348–362. Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 284–291. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt. Kentridge, R. W., Heywood, C. A., & Weiskrantz, L. (1999). Attention without awareness in blindsight. Proceedings of rhe Royal Society of London, 266, 1805–1811. Kentridge, R. W., Heywood, C. A., & Weiskrantz, L. (2004). Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight. Neuropsychologia, 42, 831–835. Kentridge, R. W., Nijboer, T. C., & Heywood, C. A. (2008). Attended but unseen: Visual attention is not sufficient for visual awareness. Neuropsychologia, 46, 864–869. Klein, R. M. (2004). On the control of visual orienting. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 29–44). New York: Guilford. Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 16–22. Kusnir, F., Chica, A. B., Mitsumasu, M. A., & Bartolomeo, P. (2011). Phasic auditory alerting improves visual conscious perception. Consciousness and Cognition. Lamme, V. A. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 12–18. Lavie, N. (2006). The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Research, 1080, 91–100. Liu, T., Abrams, J., & Carrasco, M. (2009). Voluntary attention enhances contrast appearance. Psychological Science, 20, 354–362. Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Inhibition of return. In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. McCormick, P. A. (1997). Orienting attention without awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 168–180. Mele, S., Savazzi, S., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (2008). Reaction time inhibition from subliminal cues: Is it related to inhibition of return? Neuropsychologia, 46, 810–819. Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2001). Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition, 79, 115–134. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1942). La structure du comportement. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., & Lupiáñez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1280–1296. Mort, D. J., Malhotra, P., Mannan, S. K., Rorden, C., Pambakian, A., Kennard, C., et al. (2003). The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain, 120, 1986–1997. Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315–330. Nobre, A. C. (2001). The attentive homunculus: Now you see it, now you don't. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 477–496. O'Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939–973. Posner, M. I. (1994). Attention: The mechanisms of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 7398–7403. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174. Prinzmetal, W., McCool, C., & Park, S. (2005). Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 73–92. Rolke, B., & Hofmann, P. (2007). Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 522–526. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburg: Psychology Software Tools. Sergent, C., Baillet, S., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1391–1400. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50. Snodgrass, M., Kalaida, N., & Winer, E. S. (2009). Access is mainly a second-order process: SDT models whether phenomenally (first-order) conscious states are accessed by reflectively (second-order) conscious processes. Consciousness & Cognition, 18, 561–564. discussion 565–567. Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 314–318. Wilimzig, C., Tsuchiya, N., Fahle, M., Einhauser, W., & Koch, C. (2008). Spatial attention increases performance but not subjective confidence in a discrimination task. Journal of Vision, 8(5, Art. 7), 1–10. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Dissociations among attention, perception, and awareness during object-substitution masking. Psychological Science, 14, 605–611. Wyart, V., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2008). Neural dissociation between visual awareness and spatial attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 2667–2679.