Spatial Differences in Multi‐Resolution Urban Automata Modeling

Transactions in GIS - Tập 8 Số 4 - Trang 479-492 - 2004
Charles Dietzel1, Keith Clarke1
1Department of Geography University of California-Santa Barbara

Tóm tắt

Abstract

The last decade has seen a renaissance in spatial modeling. Increased computational power and the greater availability of spatial data have aided in the creation of new modeling techniques for studying and predicting the growth of cities and urban areas. Cellular automata is one modeling technique that has become widely used and cited in the literature; yet there are still some very basic questions that need to be answered with regards to the use of these models, specifically relating to the spatial resolution during calibration and how it can impact model forecasts. Using the SLEUTH urban growth model (Clarke et al. 1997), urban growth for San Joaquin County (CA) is projected using three different spatial grains, based on four calibration routines, and the spatial differences between the model outputs are examined. Model outputs show that calibration at finer scaled data results in different parameter sets, and forecasting of urban growth in areas that was not captured through the use of more coarse data.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agarwal C, 2000, A Review and Assessment of Land‐use Change Models: Dynamics of Space, Time, and Human Choice

Batty M, 1977, Urban Modelling

10.1080/02693799408902013

10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00015-0

Brail R K, 2001, Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools

CA‐FMMP2003California Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. WWW document http://ceres.ca.gov/calsip/cv/

Candau J, 2000, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling (GIS/EM4)

10.1080/136588198241617

10.1068/b240247

Clarke K C, 2002, Geographic Information Systems and Environmental Modeling

10.1007/BF00135078

Couclelis H, 1985, Cellular worlds: A framework for modeling micro‐macro dynamics, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 17, 585

10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00042-X

10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250510.x

Esnard A M, 2002, Descriptive and comparative studies of 1990 urban extent data for the New York Metropolitan Region, URISA Journal, 14, 57

Geertman S, 2002, Planning Support Systems in Practice

Goldstein N C, 2004, GeoDynamics

10.1068/b2983

10.1068/b260393

10.1068/b250795

10.1080/01944367308977851

10.1080/01944369408975549

Li X, 2001, Zoning land for agricultural protection by the integration of remote sensing, GIS, and cellular automata, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 471

Pettit C, 2002, Planning Support Systems in Practice, 331

10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00014-X

10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00068-6

10.1007/978-94-009-9394-5_18

10.1068/b2802ed

U.S. EPA2000Projecting Land‐use Change: A Summary of Models for Assessing the Effects of Community Growth and Change on Land‐use Patterns. Cincinnati OH U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Report No EPA/600/R‐00/098(available athttp://www.epa.gov/ecommunity/tools/reportfinal3.pdf)

U.S. Geological Survey2003.Preliminary Assessment of Urban Growth in California's Central Valley. WWW document http://ceres.ca.gov/calsip/cv/

10.1007/s00267-002-2630-x

10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00008-9

10.1080/01944369408975547

10.1068/a251175

10.1080/13658810210157769

10.1080/1365881031000086965

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Transactions in GIS

Tập 8 Số 4

479-492

Thông tin tác giả