Spandrel panels in masonry buildings: Effectiveness of the diagonal strut model within the equivalent frame model

Structures - Tập 27 - Trang 879-893 - 2020
Antonio Sandoli1, Christian Musella1, Gian Piero Lignola1, Bruno Calderoni1, Andrea Prota1
1University of Naples Federico II, Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples, Italy

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Calderoni, 2011, A simplified theoretical model for the evaluation of structural behavior of masonry spandrels, Int Journ Mat and Struct Integrity, 5, 192, 10.1504/IJMSI.2011.041934

Quagliarini, 2017, Uses and limits of the equivalent frame model on existing unreinforced masonry buildings for assessing their seismic risk: A review, J Build Eng, 10, 166, 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.004

Berti, 2017, Unreinforced masonry walls with irregular opening layouts: reliability of equivalent-frame modeling for seismic vulnerability assessment, Bull Earth Eng, 2017, 1213, 10.1007/s10518-016-9985-5

Khanmohammadi, 2014, Seismic behavior prediction of flanged unreinforced masonry (FURM) walls, J Earth Eng, 18, 759, 10.1080/13632469.2014.897273

Parisi, 2013, Seismic capacity of irregular unreinforced masonry walls with openings, Earth Eng Struct Dyn, 42, 101, 10.1002/eqe.2195

Siano, 2019, Numerical investigation of nonlinear equivalent-frame models for regular masonry walls, Eng Struct, 173, 512, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.006

Cattari S., Lagomarsino S., 2008. A strength criterion for the flexural behavior of spandrel in un-reinforced masonry walls. Proceeding of the 14th WCEE, Bejing, Cina. 2008. October.

Beyer, 2012, Quasi-static cyclic tests on masonry spandrels, Earth Spectra, 28, 907, 10.1193/1.4000063

Beyer, 2013, Review of strength models for masonry spandrels, Bull Earth Eng, 11, 521, 10.1007/s10518-012-9394-3

Gesualdo, 2019, Minimum energy approach for the in-plane shear resistance of masonry panels, Ingegneria Sismica- Int J Earth Eng, 36, 42

Rinaldin, 2017, Review of experimental cyclic tests on unreinforced and strengthened masonry spandrels and numerical modeling of their cyclic behavior, Eng Struct, 132, 609, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.063

Sandoli, 2019, FRP-confined tuff masonry columns: Regular and irregular stone arrangement, Comp. Part B: Eng., 162, 621, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.015

Marino, 2019, Post-earthquake damage simulation of two colonial unreinforced clay brick masonry buildings using the equivalent frame approach, Structures, 19, 212, 10.1016/j.istruc.2019.01.010

Foraboschi, 2009, Coupling effect between masonry spandrels and piers, Mat Struct, 42, 279, 10.1617/s11527-008-9405-7

Tomazevic, M. (1999). Series on Innovation in Structures and Construction – vol.1. Earthquake-resistant design of masonry buildings. Imperial College Press 1999. London.

Calderoni, 2010, Il comportamento strutturale delle fasce di piano degli edifici in muratura soggetti ad azioni orizzontali: indagine sperimentale, Ingegneria Sismica- Int J Earth Eng, 2010, 49

OPCM 3274 Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica. 2003. (in Italian).

Italian Building Code 2008 (IBC08), D.M. 01/01/2008. Technical code for constructions. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructures. Italy. (in Italian).

Italian Building Code 2018 (IBC18), D.M. 17/01/2018. Technical code for constructions. Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructures. Italy. (in Italian).

NZSEE-2011. Assessment and improvement of unreinforced masonry buildings for earthquake resistance. Draft guidelines, New Zealand Society for Earthquake engineering. Wellington. New Zealand.

FEMA – 306. ATC,, 1998

EN 1998-3 2005. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. CEN (European Committee for Standardization). Brussels. Belgium.

Lenza, 1989, A truss model for nonlinear analysis of masonry buildings, Ingegneria Sismica- Int J Earth Eng, 1, 44

D’Asdia, 1994, Seismic analyses of masonry buildings, Ingegneria Sismica- Int J Earth Eng, 1, 32

Caliò, 2012, A new discrete element model for the evaluation of the seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry buildings, Eng Struct, 2012, 327, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.039

Fonseca F, Dillon P. Analysis of masonry shear walls using strut-and-tie models. Proc. of 13th Canadian Masonry symposium. Halifax, Canada. 2017. June.

ISR. Italian Seismic Recommendations n. 7/2019. Instruction for the use of Technical Code for construction, published by D.M. 17/01/2018. Ministry of Infrastructure and Transportation. Italy.

Calderoni, 2016, Seismic vulnerability of ‘ancient’ masonry buildings and strengthening intervention strategies. Proc. of 16th Brick and Block Masonry, Conference (IBMAC). Trends, Innovation Challenges. Padua, Italy, July, 727

Sandoli A, Calderoni B. Assessment of the seismic vulnerability at territorial scale: A new structural-typological classification of existing buildings and definition of fragility curves. Proc. of the International Masonry Conferences 0(222279), Milan, Italy, 2018. July: 153-168.

Calderoni, 2019, The spandrel of masonry buildings: Experimental tests and numerical analysis, Int J Mas Res Inn, 4, 123, 10.1504/IJMRI.2019.096822

ASCE/SEI 41-136. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers. 2014. Reston. VA.

EQ Asses. Part C – Unreinforced masonry buildings. The seismic assessment of existing buildings. Technical Guidelines for Engineering Assessment. 2017. New Zealand.

Calvi, 1994, Experimental research on response of URM building systems. Proc. of the US-Italy workshop on guidelines for seismic evaluation and rehabilitation of unreinforced masonry buildings. Pavia, Technical report NCEER-94-0021, Natl Centre Earthq Eng Buffalo, USA

Magenes, 1998, Simplified nonlinear seismic analyses of masonry buildings, Proc. of the British Masonry Society, 8, 190

Lagomarsino, 2013, TreMuri program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings, Eng Struct, 56, 1787, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.002