Something for every one? - An investigation of people’s intention to use different types of shared electric vehicle

Ahmed, 2021, Understanding young commuters’ mode choice decision to use private car or public transport from an extended theory of planned behavior, Transp. Res. Rec., 2675, 200, 10.1177/0361198120967936 Ajzen, 1991, The theory of planned behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 50, 179, 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Akgün-Tanbay, 2022, Modelling road user perceptions towards safety, comfort, and chaos at shared space: the via maqueda case study, Italy, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 1, 10.1155/2022/4979496 Alonso-González, 2020, Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS)–A latent class cluster analysis of attitudes, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 378 Asgari, 2018, A Stated Preference survey approach to understanding mobility choices in light of shared mobility services and automated vehicle technologies in the US, Transp. Res. Rec., 2672, 12, 10.1177/0361198118790124 Atchley, W. R. (2007). Introduction to Principal Components and Factor Analysis. Retrieved September 24, 2020, from ftp://statgen.ncsu.edu/pub/thorne/ molevoclass/AtchleyOct19.pdf. Becker, 2018, Exploring the potential of free cargo-bikesharing for sustainable mobility, GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27, 156, 10.14512/gaia.27.1.11 Bieliński, 2021, Electric bike-sharing services mode substitution for driving, public transit, and cycling, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 96, 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102883 Bösehans, 2021, eHUBs—Identifying the potential early and late adopters of shared electric mobility hubs, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1, 10.1080/15568318.2021.2015493 Bösehans, G., Bell, M., Thorpe, N., Goodman, P., de Almeida Correia, G. H., Liao, F., & Dissanayake, D. (2021). eHUBS – Summary report of aggregate survey results. Retrieved July 11, 2022, from DRAFT Report on the aggregate results of the (QS1) survey (nweurope.eu). Butler, 2020, Barriers and risks of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) adoption in cities: A systematic review of the literature, Cities, 103036 Campisi, 2021, 669 Chapman, 2020, Does car-sharing reduce car-use? An impact evaluation of car-sharing in Flanders, Belgium. Sustainability, 12, 8155, 10.3390/su12198155 Choueiry Ciari, 2017, 51 Claasen Cohen, 2003 Donald, 2014, An extended theory of planned behaviour model of the psychological factors affecting commuters' transport mode use, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 39, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.003 Dorner, F., & Berger, M. (2020). Peer-to-Peer Cargo Bike Sharing: Findings from LARA Share project. In Proceedings of 8th Transport Research Arena TRA 2020, April 27-30, 2020, Helsinki, Finland. Eccarius, 2020, Adoption intentions for micro-mobility–Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 84, 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102327 Faria, 2013, Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 24, 271, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.063 Firnkorn, 2015, Free-floating electric carsharing-fleets in smart cities: The dawning of a post-private car era in urban environments?, Environ. Sci. Policy, 45, 30, 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.005 Fishman, 2016, E-bikes in the mainstream: Reviewing a decade of research, Transport Reviews, 36, 72, 10.1080/01441647.2015.1069907 Flores, 2021, The role of consumer innovativeness and green perceptions on green innovation use: The case of shared e-bikes and e-scooters, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10.1002/cb.1957 Gao, 2019, Understanding the adoption of bike sharing systems: By combining technology diffusion theories and perceived risk, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 10, 464, 10.1108/JHTT-08-2018-0089 Garaus, M., & Garaus, C. (2021). The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Consumers' Intention to Use Shared-Mobility Services in German Cities. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 367.Ge, Y., Qu, W., Qi, H., Cui, X., & Sun, X. (2020). Why people like using bikesharing: Factors influencing bikeshare use in a Chinese sample. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102520. Ge, 2020, Why people like using bikesharing: Factors influencing bikeshare use in a Chinese sample, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102520, 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102520 Heinen, 2016, Identity and travel behaviour: A cross-sectional study on commute mode choice and intention to change, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 43, 238, 10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.016 Hinkeldein, 2015 Ho, 2020, Public preferences for mobility as a service: Insights from stated preference surveys, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 70 Hoj, 2018, Increasing active transportation through e-bike use: pilot study comparing the health benefits, attitudes, and beliefs surrounding e-bikes and conventional bikes, JMIR public health and surveillance, 4, e10461, 10.2196/10461 Hollingsworth, 2019, Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 084031, 10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8 Hosseinzadeh, 2021, E-scooters and sustainability: Investigating the relationship between the density of E-scooter trips and characteristics of sustainable urban development, Sustainable Cities and Society, 66, 102624, 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102624 James, 2019, Pedestrians and e-scooters: An initial look at e-scooter parking and perceptions by riders and non-riders, Sustainability, 11, 5591, 10.3390/su11205591 Jie, 2021, Factors affecting the adoption of shared mobility systems: Evidence from Australia, Research in Transportation Business & Management, 41, 100651, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100651 Jolliffe, 1986, Principal components in regression analysis, 129 Kéry, 2003, Normality of raw data in general linear models: the most widespread myth in statistics, Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 84, 92, 10.1890/0012-9623(2003)84[92:NORDIG]2.0.CO;2 Ko, 2021, Survey Data Analysis on Intention to Use Shared Mobility Services, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 1, 10.1155/2021/5585542 Kopplin, 2021, Consumer acceptance of shared e-scooters for urban and short-distance mobility, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 91, 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102680 Kroesen, 2017, To what extent do e-bikes substitute travel by other modes? Evidence from the Netherlands, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 53, 377, 10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.036 Li, 2020, An integrated choice and latent variable model to explore the influence of attitudinal and perceptual factors on shared mobility choices and their value of time estimation, Transportation Science, 54, 62, 10.1287/trsc.2019.0933 Li, 2021, Exploring Intention to Use Shared Electric Bicycles by the Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour, Sustainability, 13, 4137, 10.3390/su13084137 Linting, 2007, Nonlinear principal components analysis: Introduction and application, Psychol. Methods, 12, 336, 10.1037/1082-989X.12.3.336 Lois, 2015, Cycle commuting intention: A model based on theory of planned behaviour and social identity, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 101, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.05.003 Manjunath, 2017, Towards a meaningful metric for the quantification of GHG emissions of electric vehicles (EVs), Energy Policy, 102, 423, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.003 Mattia, 2019, Shared mobility as a driver for sustainable consumptions: The intention to re-use free-floating car sharing, J. Cleaner Prod., 237, 117404, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.235 Migliore, 2020, The environmental benefits of carsharing: the case study of Palermo, Transp. Res. Procedia, 48, 2127, 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.271 Mitra, 2021, Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio-demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors, Travel Behaviour and Society, 23, 100, 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.004 Neto, 2020, Psychological determinants of walking in a Brazilian sample: An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, 391, 10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.002 Nikiforiadis, 2019, Exploring Travellers’ Characteristics Affecting their Intention to Shift to Bike-Sharing Systems due to a Sophisticated Mobile App, Algorithms, 12, 264, 10.3390/a12120264 Norman, 2010, Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics, Adv. Health Sci. Educ., 15, 625, 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y 2011 Reck, 2021, Who uses shared micro-mobility services? Empirical evidence from Zurich, Switzerland, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102803 Rogers, 1995, Diffusion of Innovations: Modifications of a model for telecommunications, 25 Rogers, 2010 Sanchez-Pinto, 2018, Comparison of variable selection methods for clinical predictive modeling, Int. J. Med. Inf., 116, 10, 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.006 Schlüter, 2019, Car sharing as a means to raise acceptance of electric vehicles: An empirical study on regime change in automobility, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 185, 10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.005 Shaheen, 2016, Mobility and the sharing economy: Potential to facilitate the first-and last-mile public transit connections, Built Environment, 42, 573, 10.2148/benv.42.4.573 Si, 2020, Understanding intention and behavior toward sustainable usage of bike sharing by extending the theory of planned behavior, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 152, 104513, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104513 Van Cauwenberg, 2019, E-bikes among older adults: benefits, disadvantages, usage and crash characteristics, Transportation, 46, 2151, 10.1007/s11116-018-9919-y Wappelhorst, 2014, Potential of electric carsharing in urban and rural areas, Transp. Res. Procedia, 4, 374, 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.028 Williams, 2010, Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test, 840 Yu, 2018, January). Understanding the intention to use commercial bike-sharing systems: An integration of TAM and TPB, 10.24251/HICSS.2018.082