Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Giải quyết vấn đề xe tự lái một chiều bằng lý thuyết rủi ro và động lực học xe
Tóm tắt
Các câu hỏi về việc một chiếc xe tự lái nên làm gì nếu gặp phải một tình huống tương tự như 'vấn đề xe điện' đã chiếm ưu thế trong các cuộc thảo luận gần đây về đạo đức của xe tự lái. Bài báo này lập luận rằng sự quan tâm này là không đúng chỗ. Nếu một tình huống dilemma kiểu xe điện thực sự xảy ra, với những giới hạn về thông tin mà xe có thể tiếp nhận, động lực học phanh và độ bám của lốp xe xác định rằng, bất kể kết quả nào, luôn là ít rủi ro hơn cho chiếc xe nếu phanh theo một đường thẳng thay vì tránh.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abe, M., & Manning, W. (2009). Vehicle handling dynamics. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., et al. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature,563, 59–78.
Bostyn, D. H., Sevenhant, S., & Roets, A. (2018). Of mice, men, and trolleys: Hypothetical judgement versus real-life behaviour in trolley-style moral dilemmas. Psychological Science,29(7), 1084–1093.
Department for Transport (DfT). (2018). The highway code. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code. Accessed July 2018.
Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI) Ethics Commission. (2017). Automated and connected driving. https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/EN/publications/report-ethics-commission.html?nn=187598. Accessed October 2018.
Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review,5, 5–15.
Freichard, T. (2014). Will the driver seat ever be empty? Research Report RR-8493, INRIA.
Fried, B. (2012). What does matter? The case for killing the trolley problem (or letting it die). The Philosophical Quarterly,62(248), 505–529.
Gogoll, J., & Müller, J. (2017). Autonomous cars: In favor of a mandatory ethics setting. Science and Engineering Ethics,23(3), 681–700.
Gross, D., Ehlers, W., Wriggers, P., Schröder, J., & Müller, R. (2017). Statics—Formulas and problems. Berlin: Springer.
Hansson, S. O. (2012). A Panorama of the Philosophy of Risk. In S. Roeser, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of risk theory. New York: Springer.
Holstein, T. & Dodig-Crnkovic, G. (2018). Avoiding the intrinsic unfairness of the trolley problem. In: FairWare’18, Fairware’18: IEEE/ACM international workshop on software fairness, May 29, 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden. New York: ACM.
Johansson, R. & Nilsson, J. (2016). Disarming the trolley problem—Why self-driving cars do not need to choose whom to kill. In: Roy, M. (Ed.), Workshop CARS 2016—Critical automotive applications: Robustness. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01375606. Accessed October 2018.
Krafft, M., Kullgren, A., Lie, A. & Tingvall, C. (2004). Assessment of whiplash protection in rear impacts—Crash tests and real-life crashes. Folksam & Swedish National Road Administration. https://www.trafikverket.se/contentassets/955dd108474b4f289eddeeb2c49fe0b5/assesment_of_whiplash_protection_in_rear_impacts_2004.pdf. Accessed October 2018.
Lawrence, E. D., Bomey, N. & Tanner, K. (2018). Death on foot: America’s love of SUVs is killing pedestrians. Detroit Free Press/USA Today network 1 July. https://eu.freep.com/story/money/cars/2018/06/28/suvs-killing-americas-pedestrians/646139002/. Accessed July 13, 2018.
Lin, P. (2016). Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous driving: Technical, legal and social aspects. Berlin: Springer.
Meder, B., Fleischhut, N., Krumnau, N., & Waldmann, M. R. (2019). How should autonomous cars drive? A preference for defaults in moral judgments under risk and uncertainty. Risk Analysis,39(2), 295–314.
Nyholm, S., & Smids, J. (2016). The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: An applied trolley problem? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,19, 1275–1289.
Parfit, D. (2011). On what matters: Volume one. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, D. C. (2010). Relationship between speed and risk of fatal injury: Pedestrians and car occupants. London: Department for Transport.
Rolf, M., Crook, N. & Steil, J. J. (2018). From social interaction to ethical AI: A developmental roadmap. In IEEE conference: Development and learning and epigenetic robotics, Tokyo, Japan. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327446337_From_social_interaction_to_ethical_AI_a_developmental_roadmap. Accessed October 31, 2018.
Rosén, E., & Sander, U. (2009). Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. Accident Analysis and Prevention,41, 536–542.
Wood, A. (2011). Humanity as end in itself. In D. Parfit (Ed.), On what matters: Volume two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woollard, F. (2017). Driverless cars and ethics without algorithms. 6 November, University of Liverpool.
Yoo, B., Kwak, Y., Kim, Y., Choi, C., & Kim, J. (2018). Deep facial age estimation using conditional multitask learning with weak label expansion. IEEE Signal Processing Letters,25(6), 808–812.