Solvent accessible surface area approximations for rapid and accurate protein structure prediction

Elizabeth Durham1, Brent Dorr1, Nils Woetzel1, René Staritzbichler1, Jens Meiler2
1Departments of Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Biomedical Informatics and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, 465 21st Ave South, BioSci/MRB III, Room 5144B, Nashville, TN, 37232-8725, USA
2Department of Chemistry, VU Station B # 351822, Vanderbilt University, 7330 Stevenson Center, Nashville, TN, 37235-1822, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Baker D, Sali A (2001) Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294:93–96

Fang Y, Frutos AG, Lahiri J (2002) Membrane protein microarrays. J Am Chem Soc 124(11):2394–2395

Wiener MC (2004) A pedestrian guide to membrane protein crystallization. Methods 34(3):364–372

Alexander N et al (2008) De novo high-resolution protein structure determination from sparse spin-labeling EPR data. Structure 16(2):181–195

Jiang W et al (2001) Bridging the information gap: computational tools for intermediate resolution structure interpretation. J Mol Biol 308(5):1033–1044

Baker D, Sali A (2001) Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294(5540):93–96

Bourne PE (2003) CASP and CAFASP experiments and their findings. Methods Biochem Anal 44:501–507

Bradley P et al (2005) Free modeling with Rosetta in CASP6. Proteins 61(Suppl 7):128–134

Dill KA (1990) Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry 29(31):7133–7155

Lazaridis T, Karplus M (2000) Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10(2):139–145

Sippl MJ (1995) Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5(2):229–235

Juffer AH et al (1995) Comparison of atomic solvation parametric sets: applicability and limitations in protein folding and binding. Protein Sci 4(12):2499–2509

Boas FE, Harbury PB (2007) Potential energy functions for protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17(2):199–204

Chen CT et al (2006) HYPLOSP: a knowledge-based approach to protein local structure prediction. J Bioinform Comput Biol 4(6):1287–1307

Lu H, Skolnick J (2003) Application of statistical potentials to protein structure refinement from low resolution ab initio models. Biopolymers 70(4):575–584

Ferrada E, Melo F (2007) Nonbonded terms extrapolated from nonlocal knowledge-based energy functions improve error detection in near-native protein structure models. Protein Sci 16(7):1410–1421

Casadio R et al (2007) Thinking the impossible: how to solve the protein folding problem with and without homologous structures and more. Methods Mol Biol 350:305–320

Simons KT et al (1997) Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 268(1):209–225

Audie J, Scarlata S (2007) A novel empirical free energy function that explains and predicts protein-protein binding affinities. Biophys Chem 129(2–3):198–211

Darnell SJ, Page D, Mitchell JC (2007) An automated decision-tree approach to predicting protein interaction hot spots. Proteins 68(4):813–823

Evers A, Gohlke H, Klebe G (2003) Ligand-supported homology modelling of protein binding-sites using knowledge-based potentials. J Mol Biol 334(2):327–346

Roche O, Kiyama R, Brooks CL 3rd (2001) Ligand-protein database: linking protein-ligand complex structures to binding data. J Med Chem 44(22):3592–3598

Gohlke H, Hendlich M, Klebe G (2000) Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 295(2):337–356

Grzybowski BA et al (2002) From knowledge-based potentials to combinatorial lead design in silico. Acc Chem Res 35(5):261–269

Poole AM, Ranganathan R (2006) Knowledge-based potentials in protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16(4):508–513

Isogai Y et al (2005) Design of lambda Cro fold: solution structure of a monomeric variant of the de novo protein. J Mol Biol 354(4):801–814

DeBolt SE, Skolnick J (1996) Evaluation of atomic level mean force potentials via inverse folding and inverse refinement of protein structures: atomic burial position and pairwise non-bonded interactions. Protein Eng 9(8):637–655

Frishman D, Argos P (1995) Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins 23(4):566–579

Domingues FS et al (1999) Sustained performance of knowledge-based potentials in fold recognition. Proteins Suppl 3:112–120

Koehl P, Delarue M (1994) Polar and nonpolar atomic environments in the protein core: implications for folding and binding. Proteins 20(3):264–278

Koehl P, Levitt M (1999) Structure-based conformational preferences of amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(22):12524–12529

Ooi T et al (1987) Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84(10):3086–3090

Viacarra C, Mayo S (2005) Electrostatics in computational protein design. Curr Opin Chem Biol 9(6):622–626

Pokala N, Handel TM (2004) Energy functions for protein design I: efficient and accurate continuum electrostatics and solvation. Protein Sci 13(4):925–936

Gordon DB, Marshall SA, Mayo SL (1999) Energy functions for protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 9(4):509–513

Street AG, Mayo SL (1998) Pairwise calculation of protein solvent-accessible surface areas. Fold Des 3(4):253–258

Lee B, Richards FM (1971) The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. J Mol Biol 55(3):379–400

Shrake A, Rupley JA (1973) Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J Mol Biol 79(2):351–371

Colloc’h N, Mornon JP (1990) A new tool for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of protein surfaces using B-spline and density of surface neighborhood. J Mol Graphics 8:133–140

Le Grand SM, Merz KM Jr (1992) Rapid approximation to molecular surface area via the use of boolean logic and look-up tables. J Comp Chem 14(3):349–352

Wodak SJ, Janin J (1980) Analytical approximation to the accessible surface area of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77(4):1736–1740

Pearl LH, Honegger A (1983) Generation of molecular surfaces for graphic display. J Mol Graphics 1(1):9–12

You T, Bashford D (1994) An analytical algorithm for the rapid determination of the solvent-accessibility of points in a three-dimensional lattice around a solute molecule. J Comp Chem 16(6):743–757

Juffer AH, Vogel HJ (1998) A flexible triangulation method to describe the solvent-accessible surface of biopolymers. J Comput Aided Mol Des 12(3):289–299

Zhang N, Zeng C, Wingreen NS (2004) Fast accurate evaluation of protein solvent exposure. Proteins 57(3):565–576

Sanner MF, Olson AJ, Spehner JC (1996) Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 38(3):305–320

Stouten PFW et al (1993) An effective solvation term based on atomic occupancies for use in protein simulations. Mol Simul 10(2–6):97–120

Rohl CA et al (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383:66–93

Karchin R, Cline M, Karplus K (2004) Evaluation of local structure alphabets based on residue burial. Proteins 55(3):508–518

Weiser J, Shenkin PS, Still WC (1999) Approximate solvent-accessible surface areas from tetrahedrally directed neighbor densities. Biopolymers 50(4):373–380

Eisenhaber F, Argos P (1996) Hydrophobic regions on protein surfaces: definition based on hydration shell structure and a quick method for their computation. Protein Eng 9(12):1121–1133

Flower DR (1997) SERF: a program for accessible surface area calculations. J Mol Graph Model 15(4):238–244

Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(1):33–38 27–28

Wang GL, Dunbrack RL (2005) PISCES: recent improvements to a PDB sequence culling server. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W94–W98

Wang GL, Dunbrack RL (2003) PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19(12):1589–1591

Carugo O, Pongor S (2001) A normalized root-mean-square distance for comparing protein three-dimensional structures. Protein Sci 10(7):1470–1473