Solidarity as an Empirical-Ethical Framework for the Analysis of Contact Tracing Apps — a Novel Approach
Tóm tắt
Digital contact tracing is used in different countries to help contain the COVID-19 pandemic. It raises challenging empirical and ethical questions due to its complexity and widespread effects calling for a broader approach in ethical evaluation. However, existing approaches often fail to include all relevant value perspectives or lack reference to empirical data on the artifact in question. In this paper, we describe the development of an interdisciplinary framework to analyze digital contact tracing from an empirical and ethical perspective. Starting with an analysis of methodological tensions in the attempt to analyze digital contact tracing, we, firstly, set out three methodological premises regarding (a) a specific view of technology, (b) a fruitful normative perspective, and (c) ways to gather empirical knowledge about the object under investigation. Secondly, we inspect consequences of these premises to develop our research methodology. In doing so, we argue for a postphenomenological perspective on technology, solidarity as an important concept to guide the ethical perspective, and an empirical approach based on qualitative social science research and the concept of affordances. We illustrate these considerations by referring to our analysis of the German Corona-Warn-App as an instance of contact tracing based on the Exposure Notification Framework by Google and Apple. We then discuss the implications of using such a framework, including considerations concerning future developments of technologies similar to or inspired by the current concepts of contact tracing.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Almagor, J., & Picascia, S. (2020). Exploring the effectiveness of a COVID-19 contact tracing app using an agent-based model. Scientific Reports, 10, 22235. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79000-y
Altmann, S., Milsom, L., Zillessen, H., Blasone, R., Gerdon, F., Bach, R., et al. (2020). Acceptability of app-based contact tracing for COVID-19: Cross-country survey study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8, 19857. https://doi.org/10.2196/19857
Anglemyer, A., Moore, T. H., Parker, L., Chambers, T., Grady, A., Chiu, K., et al. (2020). Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: A rapid review. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 8, CD013699. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013699
Aydin, C., González Woge, M., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2019). Technological environmentality: Conceptualizing technology as a mediating milieu. Philosophy & Technology, 32, 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0309-3
Bayertz, K. (1998). Begriff und Problem der Solidarität. In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Solidarität: Begriff und Problem (1st ed., pp. 11–53). Suhrkamp.
Bellemare, C. A., Dagenais, P. K., K-Bédard, S., Béland, J. P., Bernier, L., Daniel, C. É., et al. (2018). Ethics in health technology assessment: A systematic review. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 34, 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462318000508
Berry, D. M. (2015). The philosophy of software: Code and mediation in the digital age. Palgrave Macmillan.
Blasimme, A., Ferretti, A., & Vayena, E. (2021). Digital contact tracing against COVID-19 in Europe: Current features and ongoing developments. Frontiers in Digital Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.660823
Blixt, L., Solbrække, K., & Bjorbækmo, W. (2023). Embodying digital spaces in a clinical encounter: A postphenomenological analysis. Phenomenology & Practice, 17, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr29428
Bobbert, M. (2007). Von der 'Solidarité de fait' zur 'Solidarité devoir' - ein Fehlschluss? Ethische und antropologische Überlegungen zum Solidaritätskonzept der 'gesellschaftlichen Verbundheit'. In H.-J. Große Kracht, T. Karcher, & C. Spieß (Eds.), Das System des Solidarismus: Zur Auseinandersetzung mit dem Werk von Heinrich Pesch SJ (pp. 115–136). Lit-Verl.
Brey, P. (2010). Philosophy of technology after the empirical turn. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 14, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne20101416
Brey, P. (2016). Constructive philosophy of technology and responsible innovation. In M. Franssen, P. E. Vermaas, P. Kroes, & A. W. Meijers (Eds.), Philosophy of technology after the empirical turn (1st ed., Vol. 23, pp. 127–143). Springer.
Budd, J., Miller, B. S., Manning, E. M., Lampos, V., Zhuang, M., Edelstein, M., et al. (2020). Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19. Nature Medicine, 26, 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1011-4
Buhmann, A., & Fieseler, C. (2021). Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence. Technology in Society, 64, 101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101475
Burns, J., Movsisyan, A., Stratil, J. M., Coenen, M., Emmert-Fees, K. M., Geffert, K., et al. (2020). Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 10, CD013717. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013717
Carminati, L. (2018). Generalizability in qualitative research: A tale of two traditions. Qualitative Health Research, 28(13), 2094–2101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318788379
Childress, J. F. (2009). Methods in bioethics. In B. Steinbock (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199562411.003.0002
Cirucci, A. M. (2017). Normative interfaces: Affordances, gender, and race in Facebook. Social Media + Society, 3, 205630511771790.
Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Sage Publications.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE.
Cotton, M. (2014). Ethical tools. In M. Cotton (Ed.), Ethics and technology assessment: A participatory approach (Vol. 13, pp. 65–85). Springer.
Dawson, A., & Verweij, M. (2012). Solidarity: A moral concept in need of clarification. Public Health Ethics, 5, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phs007
de Boer, B. (2021). Explaining multistability: Postphenomenology and affordances of technologies. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01272-3
de Boer, B., & Kudina, O. (2021). What is morally at stake when using algorithms to make medical diagnoses? Expanding the discussion beyond risks and harms. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 42, 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-021-09553-0
Düwell, M. (2009). Wofür braucht die Medizinethik empirische Methoden? Ethik in Der Medizin, 21, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00481-009-0019-6
Floridi, L., & Strait, A. (2020). Ethical foresight analysis: What it is and why it is needed? Minds and Machines, 30, 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09521-y
Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Borning, A., & Huldtgren, A. (2013). Value sensitive design and information systems. In N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel, & M. E. Gorman (Eds.), Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory (pp. 55–95). Springer.
Frittgen, E.-M., & Haltaufderheide, J. (2022). ‘Can you hear me?’: Communication, relationship and ethics in video-based telepsychiatric consultations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107434
Fromm, J., Mirbabaie, M., & Stieglitz, S. (2020). A systematic review of empirical affordance studies: Recommendations for affordance research in information systems. Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Paper 42
Google. (2021). Exposure notifications API. Retrieved July, 30, 2021, from https://developers.google.com/android/exposure-notifications/exposure-notifications-api#architecture
Hagendorff, T. (2022). A virtue-based framework to support putting AI ethics into practice. Philosophy & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00553-z
Hämäläinen, A., & Hirvonen, H. (2020). Electronic Health Records reshaping the socio-technical practices in Long-Term Care of older persons. Technology in Society, 62, 101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101316
Hansson, S. O. (2017). The ethics of technology: Methods and approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.
Haug, N., Geyrhofer, L., Londei, A., Dervic, E., Desvars-Larrive, A., Loreto, V., et al. (2020). Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 1303–1312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0
Heintz, E., Lintamo, L., Hultcrantz, M., Jacobson, S., Levi, R., Munthe, C., et al. (2015). Framework for systematic identification of ethical aspects of healthcare technologies: The SBU approach. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 31, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462315000264
Hellewell, J., Abbott, S., Gimma, A., Bosse, N. I., Jarvis, C. I., Russell, T. W., et al. (2020). Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. The Lancet Global Health, 8, e488–e496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30074-7
Holm, S. (2004). A Defence of Empirical Bioethics. In S. Holm & M. F. Jonas (Eds.), Engaging the world: The use of empirical research in bioethics and the regulation of biotechnology (pp. 3–7). IOS Press.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth (the Indiana series in the philosophy of technology). Indiana University Press.
Introna, L. D. (2007). Maintaining the reversibility of foldings: Making the ethics (politics) of information technology visible. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9133-z
Introna, L. (2022). Phenomenological approaches to ethics and information technology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-it-phenomenology/.
Klenk, M. (2020). How do technological artefacts embody moral values? Philosophy & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00401-y
Klenk, M., & Duijf, H. (2020). Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: Who is (not) free to go? Ethics and Information Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09544-0.
Latour, B., & Venn, C. (2002). Morality and technology. Theory, Culture & Society, 19, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327602761899246
Liu, Y., Morgenstern, C., Kelly, J., Lowe, R., & Jit, M. (2021). The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission across 130 countries and territories. BMC Medicine, 19, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01872-8
Lo, B., & Sim, I. (2021). Ethical framework for assessing manual and digital contact tracing for COVID-19. Annals of Internal Medicine, 174, 395–400. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-5834
Lucivero, F., Hallowell, N., Johnson, S., Prainsack, B., Samuel, G., & Sharon, T. (2020). COVID-19 and contact tracing apps: Ethical challenges for a social experiment on a global scale. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 17, 835–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10016-9
Lupton, D. (2020). A more-than-human approach to bioethics: The example of digital health. Bioethics, 34(9), 969–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12798
MayKay, K., & Dawson, A. (2022). Bioethics. Critical reflections and future directions. In K. Chamberlain & A. C. Lyons (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of critical issues in health and illness (pp. 249–260). Routledge.
Mertz, M., Inthorn, J., Renz, G., Rothenberger, L. G., Salloch, S., Schildmann, J., et al. (2014). Research across the disciplines: A road map for quality criteria in empirical ethics research. BMC Medical Ethics, 15(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-17
Moerenhout, T., Fischer, G. S., & Devisch, I. (2020). The elephant in the room: A postphenomenological view on the electronic health record and its impact on the clinical encounter. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 23(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09923-5
Mossof, R., Friedlich, T., Scassa, T., Bronson, K., & Millar, J. (2020). Global Pandemic App Watch (GPAW): COVID-19 exposure notification and contact tracing apps. Retrieved December, 25, 2020, from https://craiedl.ca/gpaw/.
Moula, P., & Sandin, P. (2017). Ethical tools. In S. O. Hansson (Ed.), The ethics of technology: Methods and approaches (pp. 115–127). Rowman & Littlefield.
Musschenga, A. W. (2005). Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 30, 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310500253030
Nebeker, C., Torous, J., & Bartlett Ellis, R. J. (2019). Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17, 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1377-7
Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Mayr, V., Dobrescu, A. I., Chapman, A., Persad, E., Klerings, I., et al. (2020). Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: A rapid review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013574.pub2
Nyholm, S. (2020). Humans and robots: Ethics, agency, and anthropomorphism. Rowman & Littlefield.
O’Callaghan, M. E., Buckley, J., Fitzgerald, B., Johnson, K., Laffey, J., McNicholas, B., et al. (2020). A national survey of attitudes to COVID-19 digital contact tracing in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Journal of Medical Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02389-y
Parker, M. J., Fraser, C., Abeler-Dörner, L., & Bonsall, D. (2020). Ethics of instantaneous contact tracing using mobile phone apps in the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46, 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106314
Perakslis, E. D., & Stanley, M. (2021). Medical ethics models and frameworks in digital health. In E. D. Perakslis & M. Stanley (Eds.), Digital health: Understanding the benefit-risk patient-provider framework (pp. 23–40). Oxford University Press.
Pozo-Martin, F., Weishaar, H., Cristea, F., Hanefeld, J., Bahr, T., Schaade, L., et al. (2021). The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 epidemic growth in the 37 OECD member states. European Journal of Epidemiology, 36, 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00766-0
Prainsack, B., & Buyx, A. (2012). Solidarity in contemporary bioethics—Towards a new approach. Bioethics, 26, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01987.x
Ranisch, R., Nijsingh, N., Ballantyne, A., van Bergen, A., Buyx, A., Friedrich, O., et al. (2020). Digital contact tracing and exposure notification: Ethical guidance for trustworthy pandemic management. Ethics and Information Technology, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09566-8.
Russo, F. (2018). Digital technologies, ethical questions, and the need of an informational framework. Philosophy & Technology, 31, 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0326-2
SAP, & Deutsche Telekom. (2021). Corona-Warn-App. Retrieved August, 23, 2021, from https://github.com/corona-warn-app.
Schaefer, G. O., & Ballantyne, A. (2022). Ethics of digital contact tracing wearables. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48, 611–615. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106958
Schmietow, B., & Marckmann, G. (2019). Mobile health ethics and the expanding role of autonomy. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 22, 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09900-y
Scholz, S. J. (2015). Seeking solidarity. Philosophy. Compass, 10, 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12255
Shaw, J. A., & Donia, J. (2021). The sociotechnical ethics of digital health: A critique and extension of approaches from bioethics. Frontiers in digital health, 3, 725088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.725088
Singh, I. (2017). Evidence, epistemology and empirical bioethics. In J. Ives, M. Dunn, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Empirical bioethics: Theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 67–83). Cambridge University Press.
Steerling, E., Houston, R., Gietzen, L. J., Ogilvie, S. J., de Ruiter, H.-P., & Nygren, J. M. (2022). Examining how ethics in relation to health technology is described in the research literature: Scoping review. Interactive journal of medical research, 11, 38745. https://doi.org/10.2196/38745.Wissenschaft
Steinvorth, U. (1998). Kann Solidarität erzwingbar sein? In K. Bayertz (Ed.), Solidarität: Begriff und Problem (1st ed., pp. 54–85). Suhrkamp.
Swierstra, T., & te Molder, H. (2012). Risk and soft impacts. In S. Roeser (Ed.), Handbook of risk theory: Epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk (pp. 1049–1066). Springer.
Tollon, F. (2022). Artifacts and affordances: From designed properties to possibilities for action. Ai & Society, 37, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01155-7
Torous, J., & Roberts, L. W. (2017). The ethical use of mobile health technology in clinical psychiatry. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 205, 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/nmd.0000000000000596
van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6
Verbeek, P. P. (2001). Don ihde: The technological lifeworld. In H. Achterhuis (Ed.), American philosophy of technology (pp. 119–146). Indiana University Press.
Verbeek, P. P. (2006). Materializing morality. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31, 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905285847
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design (2nd ed.). Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.
Verbeek, PP. (2009). Cultivating humanity: Towards a non-humanist ethics of technology. In J. K. B. Olsen, E. Selinger, & S. Riis (Eds.), New waves in philosophy of technology (pp. 241–263). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227279_12
Verbeek, P.-P. (2015a). Toward a theory of technological mediation: A program for postphenomenological research. In J.-K. B. Olsen & R. P. Crease (Eds.), Technoscience and postphenomenology: The Manhattan papers (pp. 189–204). Lexington Books.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2015b). Designing the public sphere: Information technologies and the politics of mediation. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era (pp. 217–227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_21
Williams, M. (2002). Generalization in interpretive research. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 125–143). SAGE.
Williams, S. N., Armitage, C. J., Tampe, T., & Dienes, K. (2021). Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 24, 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13179
Wirth, F. N., Johns, M., Meurers, T., & Prasser, F. (2020). Citizen-centered mobile health apps collecting individual-level spatial data for infectious disease management: Scoping review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8, e22594. https://doi.org/10.2196/22594