Soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic collapse capacity of steel moment-resisting frame buildings

Structures - Tập 32 - Trang 1331-1345 - 2021
Mohammadjavad Hamidia1, Nima Shokrollahi1, Maryam Nasrolahi2
1Department of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2Earthquake Engineering Department, Engineering School, Science and Research Branch of the Islamic Azad University (SRBIAU), Tehran, Iran

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Quantification of Building Seismic analysis procedures. FEMA P695. Washington, DC; 2009.

Mylonakis, 2000, Seismic soil-structure interaction: beneficial or detrimental?, J Earthquake Eng, 4, 277, 10.1080/13632460009350372

Homaei, 2020, The probabilistic seismic assessment of aged concrete arch bridges: The role of soil-structure interaction, Structures, 28, 894, 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.038

Van Nguyen, 2020, Nonlinear seismic soil-structure interaction analysis of nuclear reactor building considering the effect of earthquake frequency content, Structures, 26, 901, 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.013

Saha, 2020, Effect of soil-pile raft-structure interaction on elastic and inelastic seismic behaviour, Structures, 26, 378, 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.04.022

Jafarieh, 2020, Seismic performance of nonlinear soil-structure systems located on soft soil considering foundation uplifting and soil yielding, Structures, 28, 973, 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.046

Yeganeh N, Fatahi B, Mirlatifi S. Effects of hyperbolic hardening parameters on seismic response of high rise buildings considering soil-structure interaction. 2019.

Yeganeh, 2019, Effects of choice of soil constitutive model on seismic performance of moment-resisting frames experiencing foundation rocking subjected to near-field earthquakes, Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng, 121, 442, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.03.027

Vaseghiamiri, 2020, Probabilistic approach to account for soil-structure interaction in seismic design of building structures, J Struct Eng, 146, 04020184, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002741

De Silva, 2020, Influence of soil-structure interaction on the site-specific seismic demand to masonry towers, Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng, 131, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.106023

Sáez, 2011, Effect of the inelastic dynamic soil–structure interaction on the seismic vulnerability assessment, Struct Saf, 33, 51, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.05.004

Rajeev, 2012, Seismic fragilities of non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with consideration of soil structure interaction, Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng, 40, 78, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.04.008

Yaghmaei-Sabegh, 2017, Considering soil-nonlinearity effect on seismic performance evaluation of structures based on pushover analysis, J Earthquake Eng, 21, 808, 10.1080/13632469.2016.1174750

Li, 2014, Influence of soil–structure interaction on seismic collapse resistance of super-tall buildings, J Rock Mech Geotech Eng, 6, 477, 10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.04.006

Khoshnoudian, 2015, Dynamic instability of Soil-SDOF structure systems under far-fault earthquakes, Earthquake Spectra, 31, 2419, 10.1193/062613EQS170M

Karapetrou, 2015, Seismic vulnerability assessment of high-rise non-ductile RC buildings considering soil–structure interaction effects, Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng, 73, 42, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.016

Mitropoulou, 2016, Influence of soil–structure interaction on fragility assessment of building structures

Pitilakis D, Petridis C. Soil-structure interaction effect on earthquake vulnerability assessment of moment resisting frames: the role of the soil. in Proc. 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 2018.

Petridis C, Pitilakis D. Soil-structure interaction effect on earthquake vulnerability assessment of moment resisting frames: the role of the structure. in Proc. 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 2018.

Dolatshahi, 2019, Displacement ratios for structures with material degradation and foundation uplift, Bull Earthq Eng, 17, 5133, 10.1007/s10518-019-00653-w

Cavalieri, 2020, Dynamic soil-structure interaction models for fragility characterisation of buildings with shallow foundations, Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng

Haghollahi, 2020, Performance evaluation of special RC moment frames against collapse considering soil-structure interaction, Int J Geomech, 20, 04019176, 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001553

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 350—Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-resisting frames. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.

Applied Technology Council (ATC), Proceedings of the Invitational Workshop on Steel Seismic Issues. Los Angeles, Redwood City, CA; 1994.

Gupta A, Krawinkler H. Seismic Demand for Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frames Structures, Report 132. 1999, Ph. D. Dissertation, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, United State.

OpenSees, Open system for earthquale engineering simulation, in pacific earthquake engineering research center. PEER. 2018, http://opensees.berekley.edu/. Richmond (CA, USA).

Lignos, 2010, Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading, J Struct Eng, 137, 1291, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376

Scott, 2006, Plastic hinge integration methods for force-based beam–column elements, J Struct Eng, 132, 244, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:2(244)

Hamidia M, Filiatrault A, Aref AJ. Simplified seismic collapse capacity-based evaluation and design of frame buildings with and without supplemental damping systems. 2014: MCEER.

Scott, 2013, Moment-rotation behavior of force-based plastic hinge elements, Earthquake Spectra, 29, 597, 10.1193/1.4000136

American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications, A.A. 358–10, Editor. 2010: Chicago, IL.

NIST, G., GCR 12-917-21. Soil-Structure Interaction for Building Structures, prepared by NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture (a partnership of the Applied Technology Council and the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering), 2012.

Salehi M, Jafarieh AH, Ghannad MA. Effects of foundation uplift on the dynamic response of steel frames. in Structures Congress 2017. 2017.

Orakdöğen, 2008, Performance evaluation of a strengthened building considering the soil-structure interaction, J Earthquake Eng, 12, 222, 10.1080/13632460802014097

Gazetas, 1991, Formulas and charts for impedances of surface and embedded foundations, J Geotechn Eng, 117, 1363, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:9(1363)

Pais, 1988, Approximate formulas for dynamic stiffnesses of rigid foundations, Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng, 7, 213, 10.1016/S0267-7261(88)80005-8

Harden, 2005, Numerical modeling of the nonlinear cyclic response of shallow foundations, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Minimum design loads of buildings and other structures, ed. A.S. 7-16. Reston, VA; 2016.

Raychowdhury P. Nonlinear winkler-based shallow foundation model for performance assessment of seismically loaded structures. UC San Diego; 2008.

Das, 2013

Behnamfar, 2017, Seismic behavior of structures considering uplift and soil–structure interaction, Adv Struct Eng, 20, 1712, 10.1177/1369433217693628

Baker, 2015, Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis, Earthquake Spectra, 31, 579, 10.1193/021113EQS025M

Jalayer, 2009, Alternative non-linear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 38, 951, 10.1002/eqe.876

Hamidia, 2014, Simplified seismic sidesway collapse analysis of frame buildings, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn, 43, 429, 10.1002/eqe.2353

Hamidia, 2014, Simplified seismic sidesway collapse capacity-based evaluation and design of frame buildings with linear viscous dampers, J Earthquake Eng, 18, 528, 10.1080/13632469.2013.876948

Dubčáková, 2011, Eureqa: software review, Genet Program Evolvable Mach, 12, 173, 10.1007/s10710-010-9124-z