Soil–Structure Interaction Effect on Seismic Force Evaluation of RC Framed Buildings with Various Shapes of Shear Wall: As Per IS 1893 and IBC

Wolf JP (1985) Dynamic soil–structure interaction. Prentice-Hall, USA

Mylonakis G, Nikolaou A, Gazetas G (1997) Soil–pile–bridge seismic interaction: kinematic and inertial effects. Part I: soft soil. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:337–359

Roy R, Dutta SC (2001) Differential settlement among isolated footings of building frames: the problem, its estimation and possible measures. Int J Appl Mech Eng 6:165–186

Roy R, Dutta SC (2001) Effect of soil–structure interaction on dynamic behaviour of building frames on grid foundations. In: Proc of the SEC, Roorkee, India, p 694–703

Tabatabaiefar HR, Fatahi B, Samali B (2013) Seismic behavior of building frames considering dynamic soil–structure interaction. Int J Geomech 13(4):409–420

Bielak J (1975) Dynamic behaviour of structures with embedded foundations. Int J Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 3:259–274

Stewart JP, Fenves GL, Seed RB (1999) Seismic soil–structure interaction in buildings I: analytical method. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng (ASCE) 125:26–37

Stewart JP, Seed RB, Fenves GL (1999) Seismic soil–structure interaction in buildings II: empirical findings. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng (ASCE) 125:38–48

Bhattacharya K, Dutta SC (2004) Assessing lateral period of building frames incorporating soil-flexibility. J Sound Vib 269:795–821

Saad G, Saddik F, Najjar S (2012) Impact of soil–structure interaction on the seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings with underground stories. In: Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal

Tabatabaiefar HR, Massumi A (2010) A simplified method to determine seismic responses of reinforced concrete moment resisting building frames under influence of soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:1259–1267

Raychowdhury P (2011) Seismic response of low-rise steel moment-resisting frame (SMRF) buildings incorporating nonlinear soil–structure interaction (SSI). Eng Struct 33:958–967

Rajasankar J, Iyer NR, Swamy BY, Goplalakrishnan N, Chellapandi P (2007) SSI analysis of a massive concrete structure based on a novel convolution/deconvolution technique. Sadhana 32:215–234

Goel RK, Chopra AK (1997) Period formulas for moment resisting frame buildings. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 123(11):1454–1461

Pong W, Lee ZH, Lee A (2006) A comparative study of seismic provisions between International building code 2003 and uniform building code 1997. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 5(1):49–60

Dogangun A (2006) A comparative study of the design spectra defined by Eurocode 8, UBC, IBC and Turkish Earthquake Code on R/C sample buildings. J Seismol 10:335–351

Ghosh SK, Khuntia M (1999) Impact of Seismic Design Provisions of 2000 IBC: Comparison with 1997UBC. In: Proc SEAOC 68th annual convention, Santa Barbra, p 229–254

Singh Y, Khose VN, Lang DH (2012) A comparative study of code provisions for ductile RC frame buildings. In: Proc 15th WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal, p 24–28

Khose VN, Singh Y, Lang DH (2012) A comparative study of design base shear for RC buildings in selected seismic design codes. Earthq Spectra 28(3):1047–1070

Imashi N, Massumi A (2011) A comparative study of the seismic provisions of Iranian seismic code (standard no. 2800) and International building code 2003. Asian J Civ Eng 12(5):579–596

Santos SHC, Zanaica L, Bucur C, Lima SS, Arai A (2013) Comparative study of codes for seismic design of structures. Math Model Civ Eng 9(1):1–12

Yayong W (2004) Comparison of seismic actions and structural design requirements in Chinese Code GB 50011 and International Standard ISO 3010. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 3(1):1–9

Nahhas TM (2011) A comparison of IBC with 1997 UBC for modal response spectrum analysis in standard-occupancy buildings. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 10(1):99–113

Malekpour S, Seyyedi P, Dashti F, Asghari JF (2011) Seismic performance evaluation of steel moment-resisting frames using Iranian, European and Japanese seismic codes. Procedia Eng 14:3331–3337

IS:1893 (part 1) (2002) Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. In: Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

International Building Code (2006) International Code Council Inc. Falls Church, Virginia

Chowdhury I, Dasgupta SP (2002) Earthquake response of soil structure system. Indian Geotech Soc 32(3):309–328

Chowdhury I, Dasgupta SP (2009) Dynamics of structure and foundation: a unified approach. CRC Press, Netherlands

IS: 456 (2000) Indian standard code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

IS: 13920 (1993) Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces: code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

FEMA 273 (1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal emergency management agency, Washington, D.C

FEMA 356 (2000) Prestandard and Commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington,D.C

Maharaj DK, Amruthavalli A, Nishamathi K (2004) Finite element analysis for frame foundation soil interaction. Electron J Geotech Eng 9:2004

Thangaraj D, Ilamparuthi K (2010) Parametric study on the performance of raft foundation with interaction of frame. Electron J Geotech Eng 15:861–878

Wu W, Wang J, Lin C (2001) Systematic assessment of irregular building–soil interaction using efficient modal analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(4):573–594

Hemsley JA (1998) Elastic analysis of raft foundations technology & engineering. Thomas Telford, London