Soil Salinity Using Saturated Paste and 1:1 Soil to Water Extracts

Soil Science Society of America Journal - Tập 69 Số 4 - Trang 1146-1151 - 2005
Hailin Zhang1, Jackie L. Schroder1, Jeremy J. Pittman1, Jim J. Wang2, Mark E. Payton3
1Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Stillwater OK 74078
2Dep. of Agronomy; Louisiana State Univ.; Baton Rouge LA 70803
3Dep. of Statistics; Oklahoma State Univ.; Stillwater OK 74078

Tóm tắt

Saturated paste (SP) and 1:1 soil/water extractions (1:1) are commonly used to assess soil salinity for field remediation. Correlation of electrical conductivity (EC) and other analytes between the SP and 1:1 extraction methods have been documented, except the relationships were based on limited soil types and require further examination to be adequately evaluated. This study examined these relationships using 170 soils from petroleum and agriculture production sites. Saturated pastes and 1:1 extracts were prepared and analyzed for EC, major cations (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+), and major anions Cl−, SO42− Relationships of all analytes were established between the two methods using linear regression. Saturated paste extract EC (ECSP) was highly correlated with that of 1:1 extract EC (EC1:1) (r2 = 0.85, P < 0.001). Significant relationships also existed (r2 > 0.73, P < 0.001) between different ions in SP and 1:1 extracts. An independent validation set of 22 soils showed that the slopes of the regressions between predicted EC, Na+, and Cl− of SP equivalents from 1:1 extract measurements and direct SP extract measurements were very close to 1.0 suggesting that the regressions developed can accurately assess soil salinity in salt affected soils using 1:1 extract analysis instead of using the more expensive and time‐consuming SP extraction.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American Petroleum Institute, 1997, Remediation of salt‐affected soils at oil and gas production facilities. API Publication No. 2663

10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040020x

Gavlak R., 2003, Plant, Soil, and Water Reference Methods for the Western Region, WREP 125

Fowler D.B., 1980, Crop response to saline soil conditions in the parkland area of Saskatchewan, Can. J. Soil Sci., 60, 439, 10.4141/cjss80-049

10.2136/sssaj1969.03615995003300020048x

Franzen D., 2003, Managing saline soils in North Dakota

Freidman S.P., 1998, Simulation of a potential error in determining soil salinity from measured apparent electrical conductivity, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 62, 593, 10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200030006x

Hogg T.J., 1984, Comparison of 1:1 and 1:2 suspensions and extracts with the saturation extract in estimating salinity in Saskatchewan soils, Can. J. Soil Sci., 64, 669

Holliday G., 1997, Soil Remediation for the Petroleum Extraction Industry

10.1097/00010694-196404000-00008

Oklahoma Mid‐Continent Oil and Gas Association, 1998, Oklahoma Corporation Commission environmental handbook

10.2136/sssaj1960.03615995002400040013x

10.1097/00010694-194603000-00001

Rhoades J.D., 1996, Methods of soil analysis. Part 3, 417

Schofeild R.K., 1947, A ratio law governing the equilibrium of cations in the soil solution, Int. Congr. Pure Appl. Chem., 3, 257

Shirokova Y., 2000, Use of electrical conductivity instead of soluble salts for soil salinity monitoring in Central Asia, Irrig. Drain. Syst., 14, 199, 10.1023/A:1026560204665

10.1007/BF01372683

SAS Institute, 2001, SAS user's guide: Statistics. Ver 8.2

USDA, 1954, Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agric. Handb. no. 60

United States Department of Energy.2003.Historic petroleum production. Available online athttp://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/historic/hpetroleum2.htm(verified 29 Mar. 2005).

Vaughn P.J., 1995, Water content effect on soil salinity prediction: A geostatistical study using cokriging, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 59, 1146, 10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900040029x

10.1097/00010694-197812000-00005

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Tập 69 Số 4

1146-1151

Thông tin tác giả