Soil Hydrology of Agricultural Landscapes: Quantitative Description, Research Methods, and Availability of Soil Water

Ye. V. Shein1,2,3, A. G. Bolotov3,1, A. V. Dembovetskii2
1Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Moscow, Russia
2Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
3Upper Volga Federal Agrarian Research Center, Suzdal, Russia

Tóm tắt

Soil hydrology has deep Russian roots, which are primarily related to the theory of soil hydrological constants and their practical application. These constants have been used to assess the hydrological soil conditions in stationary observations, for which attempts to arrange regular hydrological observations in the landscape faced impracticable complexity of work and calculations and provided unreliable quantitative predictions. At present, there are new opportunities for experimental research, digital analysis, and prediction of hydrological indicators of soils in the landscape. A new quantitative approach to the use of digital technologies for monitoring soil water and temperature in the soils of agricultural landscapes, their dynamics, and their probabilistic calculations has been developed. Based on the soil map, it is proposed to create an information and measurement system with the studied thermal and hydrophysical characteristics of soils using mathematical models to calculate the dynamics of moisture and temperature for given periods and conditions of different availability of heat and precipitation, which allows us to quantify the availability of moisture reserves in the soils of the agricultural landscape. This system of observations, assessment, and forecast includes the use of modern technologies for determining soil water content and temperature, the adaptation of predictive physically based models for calculating the dynamics of moisture reserves depending on the availability of precipitation and conditions at the lower boundary of soil profiles. The paper deals with the hydrological analysis of soils by the example of the agricultural landscape of the Zelenograd station of the Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute in the village of El’digino, Pushkino district, Moscow oblast.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agroecological Assessment of Land and Planning of Adaptive-Landscape Systems of Agriculture and Agrotechnologies, Ed. by V. I. Kiryushin and A. L. Ivanov (Rosinformagrotekh, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

A. G. Bolotov, E. V. Shein, and S. V. Makarychev, “Water retention capacity of soils in the Altai region,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 187–192 (2019).

Ye. M. Gusev and L. Ya. Dzhogan, “Soil mulching as an important element in the strategy of using natural water resources in agroecosystems of the steppe Crimea,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 313–318 (2019).

F. R. Zaidel’man, Hydrological Regime of Soils in Nonchernozem Area: Genetic, Agronomic, and Meliorative Aspects (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1985) [in Russian].

F. R. Zaidel’man, Melioration of Soils (KDU, Moscow, 2017) [in Russian].

F. R. Zaidel’man, L. F. Smirnova, A. P. Shvarov, and A. S. Nikiforova, Practical Manual on Lecture Course “Soil Reclamation” (Grif i K, Tula, 2008) [in Russian].

V. I. Kiryushin, The Development of the Concept of Landscape-Adaptive Farming in the Nonchernozemic Area (Kvadro, Moscow, 2020) [in Russian].

L. L. Shishov, V. D. Tonkonogov, I. I. Lebedeva, and M. I. Gerasimova, Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian].

A. I. Madi and E. V. Shein, “Saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils: experimental determination and calculation using pedotransfer functions,” Agrofizika, No. 1, 37–44 (2018). https://doi.org/10.25695/AGRPH.2018.01.05

N. A. Muromtsev and K. B. Anisimov, “Specific water regime of soddy-podzolic soil on different elements of soil catena,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 77, 78–93 (2015).

N. A. Muromtsev, N. A. Semenov, and K. B. Anisimov, “Specific moisture consumption and water supply of plants from various ecological groups,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 82, 71–87 (2016).

S. S. Panina and E. V. Shein, “Mathematical models of soil moisture transfer: importance of experimental assurance and upper boundary conditions,” Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 69, 133–138 (2014).

E. V. Shein, “Soil hydrology: stages of development, current state, and nearest prospects,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 43, 158–167 (2010).

E. V. Shein, A. G. Bolotov, A. B. Umarova, et al., Manual for Use of Digital Sensors for Field Soil Physics Observations (KDU, Moscow, 2019) [in Russian].

E. V. Shein, E. B. Skvortsova, S. S. Panina, A. B. Umarova, and K. A. Romanenko, “Hydro-depositary and hydro-transmitting properties of soddy-podzolic soils in the course of simulating the water transfer by physically grounded models,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 80, 71–82 (2015).

M. J. Lees, “Data-based mechanistic modeling and forecasting of hydrological systems,” J. Hydroinf. 2, 15–34 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2000.0003

Y. Li, Q. Zhang, J. Lu, J. Yao, and Z. Tan, “Assessing surface water–groundwater interactions in a complex river-floodplain wetland-isolated lake system,” River Res. Appl. 35, 25–36 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3389

L. X. Liang, D. P. Lettenmaier, E. F. Wood, and S. J. Burges, “A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for GSMs,” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 99 (7), 14415–14428 (1994).

H. Lin, J. Bouma, Y. Pachepsky, A. Western, J. Thompson, R. van Genuchten, H.-J. Vogel, and A. Lilly, “Hydropedology: synergistic integration of pedology and hydrology,” Water Resour. Res. 42, W05301 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004085

H. S. Lin, “Hydropedology: towards new insights into interactive pedologic and hydrologic processes across scales,” J. Hydrol. 406, 141–145 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.054

H. S. Lin, J. Bouma, L. Wilding, et al., “Advances in hydropedology,” Adv. Agron. 85, 1–89 (2005).

K. A. Lohse and W. E. Dietrich, “Contrasting effects of soil development on hydrological properties and flow paths,” Water Resour. Res. 41, W12419 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003403

J. J. McDonnell, M. Sivapalan, K. Vaché, et al., “Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: a new vision for watershed hydrology,” Water Resour. Res. 43, W07301 (2007).

C. Rasmussen, P. A. Troch, J. Chorover, et al., “An open system framework for integrating critical zone structure and function,” Biogeochemistry 102, 15–29 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-010-9476-8

M. G. Schaap, F. J. Leij, and M. Th. van Genuchten, “ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions,” J. Hydrol. 251, 163–176 (2002).

E. V. Shein, A. V. Dembovetsky, and S. S. Panina, “Modeling soil water movement under low head ponding and gravity infiltration using data determined with different methods,” Procedia Environ. Sci. 19, 553–555 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.062

M. Stefano, A. Bernasconi, B. Bauder, et al., “Chemical and biological gradients along the Damma Glacier soil chronose (Switzerland),” Vadose Zone J. 10, 867–883 (2011).

D. L. Strayer, R. E. Beighley, L. C. Thompson, et al., “Effects of land cover on stream ecosystems: roles of empirical models and scaling issues,” Ecosystems 6, 407–423 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-002-0170-0

G. C. Topp, J. L. Davis, and A. P. Annan, “Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines,” Water Resour. Res. 16 (3), 574–582 (1980).

K. van Looy, J. Bouma, M. Herbst, et al., “Pedotransfer functions in Earth system science: challenges and perspectives,” Rev. Geophys. 55, 1199–1256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000581