Softness, Warmth, and Responsiveness Improve Robot Hugs

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 11 - Trang 49-64 - 2018
Alexis E. Block1,2,3, Katherine J. Kuchenbecker1,2,3
1Haptics Group, GRASP Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
2Haptic Intelligence Department, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Stuttgart, Germany
3Max Planck ETH Center for Learning Systems, Zurich, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Hugs are one of the first forms of contact and affection humans experience. Due to their prevalence and health benefits, roboticists are naturally interested in having robots one day hug humans as seamlessly as humans hug other humans. This project’s purpose is to evaluate human responses to different robot physical characteristics and hugging behaviors. Specifically, we aim to test the hypothesis that a soft, warm, touch-sensitive PR2 humanoid robot can provide humans with satisfying hugs by matching both their hugging pressure and their hugging duration. Thirty relatively young and rather technical participants experienced and evaluated twelve hugs with the robot, divided into three randomly ordered trials that focused on physical robot characteristics (single factor, three levels) and nine randomly ordered trials with low, medium, and high hug pressure and duration (two factors, three levels each). Analysis of the results showed that people significantly prefer soft, warm hugs over hard, cold hugs. Furthermore, users prefer hugs that physically squeeze them and release immediately when they are ready for the hug to end. Taking part in the experiment also significantly increased positive user opinions of robots and robot use.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anzalone SM, Varni G, Ivaldi S, Chetouani M (2017) Automated prediction of extraversion during human–humanoid interaction. Int J Soc Robot 9:385–399 Bernieri FJ, Rosenthal R (1991) Interpersonal coordination: behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In: Feldman RS, Rime B (eds) Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 401–432 Charness G, Gneezy U, Kuhn MA (2012) Experimental methods between subject and within subject design. J Econ Behav Organ 81:1–8 Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (1999) The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J Personal Soc Psychol 76(6):893–910 Chen TL, King CHA, Thomaz AL, Kemp CC (2014) An investigation of responses to robot-initiated touch in a nursing context. Int J Soc Robot 6:141–161 Chen Y, Yu M, Bruck HA, Smela E (2016) Stretchable touch-sensing skin over padding for co-robots. Smart Mater Struct 25(5):1–16 Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Turner RB, Doyle WJ (2015) Does hugging provide stress-buffering social support? A study of susceptibility to upper respiratory infection and illness. Assoc Psychol Sci 26(2):135–147 Cooney MD, Becker-Asano C, Kanda T, Alissandrakis A, Ishiguro H (2010) Full-body gesture recognition using interial sensors for playful interaction with small humanoid robot. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 2276–2282 Cooney MD, Nishio S, Ishiguro H (2012) Recognizing affection for a touch-based interaction with a humanoid robot. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 1420–1427 Cramer H, Kemper N, Amin A, Wielinga B, Evers V (2009) Give me a hug: the effects of touch and autonomy on people’s responses to embodied social agents. Comput Anim Virtual Worlds 20:437–445 DiSalvo C, Gemperle F, Forlizzi J, Montgomery E (2003) The hug: an exploration of robotic form for intimate communication. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, pp 403–408 Duvall JC, Dunner LE, Schleif N, Holschuh B (2016) Active “Hugging” vest for deep touch pressure therapy. In: UbiComp/ISWC ’16 Adjunct, pp 458–463 Fitter NT, Hawkes DT, Kuchenbecker KJ (2016) Rhythmic timing in playful human-robot social motor coordination. In:Social robotics: 8th international conference 2016 proceedings. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 296–305 Garrell A, Villamizar M, Moreno-Noguer F, Sanfeliu A (2017) Teaching robot’s proactive behavior using human assistance. Int J Soc Roboti 9:231–249 Grandin T (1992) Calming effects of deep touch pressure in patients with autistic disorder, college students, and animals. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2(1):63–72 Harlow HF, Zimmerman RR (1959) Affectional responses in the infant monkey. Science 130(373):421–432 Heerink M, Krose B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2009) Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit. In: IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 528–533 Kosuge K, Takeda T, Hirata Y, Endo M, Nomura M, Sakai K, Koizumi M, Oconogi T (2008) Patner ballroom dance robot—PBDR. SICE J Control Meas Syst Integr 1(1):74–80 Krauss KE (1987) The effects of deep pressure touch on anxiety. Am J Occupat Therapy 41(6):366–373 Lakoff G, Johnson M (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. HarperCollins, New York Lynott D, Corker KS, Wortman J, Connell L, Donnellan MB, Lucas RE, O’Brien K (2014) Replication of experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth by Williams and Bargh (2008). Soc Psychol 45(3):216–222 Mahalski PA (1981) The incidence of attachment objects and oral habits at bedtime in two longitudinal samples of children aged 1.5–7 years. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 24(2):283–295 Miyashita T, Ishiguro H (2003) Human-like natural behavior generation based on involuntary motions for humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE humanoids, pp 203–212 Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35 Mummolo J, Peterson E (2017) Demand effects in survey experiments: an empirical assessment. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn2956147 Neustaedter C, Yang L (2017) Family communication over distance through telepresence robots. In: ACM CSCW workshop on robots in groups and teams Nie J, Park M, Marin AL, Sundar SS (2012) Can you hold my hand?: physical warmth in human–robot interaction. In: Seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, pp 201–202 Park E, Lee J (2014) I am a warm robot: the effects of temperature in physical human–robot Interaction. Robotica 32:133–142 Peng H, Zhou C, Hu H, Chao F, Li J (2015) Robotic dance in social robotics—a taxonomy. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 45(3):281–293 Romano JM, Kuchenbecker KJ (2011) Please touch the robot. Hands-on demonstration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), San Francisco Shiomi M, Nakagawa K, Shinozawa K, Matsumura R, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2017a) Does a robot’s touch encourage human effort? Int J Soc Robot 9:5–15 Shiomi M, Nakata A, Kanbara M, Hagita N (2017b) A hug from a robot encourages prosocial behavior. In: 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication Shiomi M, Nakata A, Kanbara M, Hagita N (2017c) A robot that encourages self-disclosure by hug. In: Springer C (ed) International conference on social robotics, pp 324–333 Short E, Hart J, Vu M, Scassellati B (2010) No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot. In: ACM (ed) 5th ACM/IEEE conference on human–robot interaction, 2010. HRI’10, pp 219–226 Stiehl WD, Lieberman J, Breazeal C, Basel L, Cooper R, Knight H, Lalla L, Maymin A, Purchase S (2006) The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational affective touch. In: Proceeding of the IEEE consumer communications and networking conference, pp 1290–1291 Sumioka H, Nakae A, Kanai R, Ishiguro H (2013) Huggable communication medium decreases cortisol levels. Sci Rep 3:3034 VandenBerg NL (2001) The use of a weighted vest to increase on-task behavior in children with attention difficulties. Am J Occup Therapy 55(6):621–628 Wallis M, Popat S, McKinney J (2010) Embodied conversations: performance and the design of a robotics dancing partner. Des Stud 31(2):99–117 Weiss A, Bernhaupt R, Tscheligi M, Wollherr D, Kuhnlenz K, Buss M (2008) A methodological variation for acceptance evaluation of human–robot interaction in public places. In: IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 713–718 Williams LE, Bargh JA (2008) Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science 322:606–607 de Winter JCF, Dodou D (2017) Experimental design in: human subject research for engineers: a practical guide. Springerbriefs in applied sciences and technology. Springer, pp 17–39 Yamane K, Kim J, Alspach AN (2017) Soft body robot for physical interaction. US patent application 20,170,095,925