Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

American journal of public health - Tập 82 Số 6 - Trang 816-820 - 1992
Marilyn A. Winkleby1, Darius Jatulis2, Erica Frank2, Stephen P. Fortmann2
1Stanford Center for Re-search in Disease Prevention, Stanford Univer-sity School of Medicine, 1000 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1885.
2Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford Uni-versity School of Medicine, in Palo Alto, CA.

Tóm tắt

BACKGROUND. Socioeconomic status (SES) is usually measured by determining education, income, occupation, or a composite of these dimensions. Although education is the most commonly used measure of SES in epidemiological studies, no investigators in the United States have conducted an empirical analysis quantifying the relative impact of each separate dimension of SES on risk factors for disease. METHODS. Using data on 2380 participants from the Stanford Five-City Project (85% White, non-Hispanic), we examined the independent contribution of education, income, and occupation to a set of cardiovascular disease risk factors (cigarette smoking, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). RESULTS. The relationship between these SES measures and risk factors was strongest and most consistent for education, showing higher risk associated with lower levels of education. Using a forward selection model that allowed for inclusion of all three SES measures after adjustment for age and time of survey, education was the only measure that was significantly associated with the risk factors (P less than .05). CONCLUSION. If economics or time dictate that a single parameter of SES be chosen and if the research hypothesis does not dictate otherwise, higher education may be the best SES predictor of good health.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Kitagawa EM, Hauser PM. Differential Mortality in the United States: A Study in SocioeconomicEpidemiology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1973.

10.1016/S0140-6736(87)93062-5

Black D. Inequaliies in Healtk Report of a Research WoHding Group. London, England: Department of Health and Social Security; 1980.

Haan M, Kaplan G, Camacho T. Poverty and health: prospective evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am J EpiemioL 1987;125:989-998.

10.1146/annurev.pu.08.050187.000551

Matthews KA, Kelsey SF, Meilahn EN, Kuller LH, Wing RR. Educational attainment and behavioral and biological risk factors for coronary heart disease in middleaged women. Am J EpidemioL 1989;129: 1132-1144.

10.1016/0091-7435(90)90001-Z

Helmert U, Herman B, Joeckel KH, Greiser E, Madans J. Social class and risk factors for coronaxy heart disease in the Federal Republic of Germany: results of the baseline survey of the German Cardiovascular Prevention Study. JEpidemiol Community Health. 1989;43:37-42.

10.2307/3348839

10.2307/1129211

10.1093/sf/49.4.563

Duncan OD. A socioeconomic indexfor all occupations. In: Reiss AJ Jr, Duncan OD, Hatt PK, North CC, eds. Occupation and Social Status. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe; 1%61:109-138.

10.2307/4593972

Susser MW, Watson W, Hopper K. Sociology in Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1985.

10.2307/3349761

10.2307/2786672

10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036030

Morgenstern H. Socioeconomic factors: concepts, measurement and health effects. NHLBI Workshop on "Measuring Psychosocial Variables in Epidemiological Studies of Cardiovascular Disease." December 1983; Galveston, TX.

Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, Maccoby N, etal. The Stanford Five-City Project: design and methods. Am J EpidehnioL 1985; 122:323-334.

Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, Flora JA, etal. Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors.JAM4. 1990;264:359-365.

USBureau of the Census. 1980 Census of Population: A41abeical Inder of Indusries and Occupations. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1982.

10.1016/0091-7435(84)90045-8

US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Lipid Research Clidcs Manual of Laboratory Opemations. Vol 1: Lipid and Lpoprotein Analysis. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1974.

Fortmann SP, Marcuson R, Bitter PH, Haskell WL. A comparison of the Sphygmetrics SR-2 automatic blood pressure recorder to the mercury sphygmomanometer inpopulationstudiesA4mJEpidemioL 1981; 114:836-84.

Socioeconomic factors: working group summary. In: Ostfeld AM, Eaker ED, eds. Measwiurg Psychosocial Variables in Epidemioogic Studes of Cardiovascular Disease: Proeedigs of a Workshop. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; March 1985. NIH publication 85-2270.

Morgan M, 1983, Community Med, 5, 116

Faia MA. Selection by certification: a neglected variable in stratification research. AmJSocioL 1981;86:1093-1111.

Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up Program Cooperative Group. Race, education and prevalence of hypertension.AmJ EpidemioL 1977;106:351-361.

10.1161/01.CIR.54.6.987

10.1016/0277-9536(82)90267-2

10.1161/01.CIR.66.6.1308

Jacobsen BK, Thelle DS. Risk factors for coronary heart disease and level of education. Am JEpiemnoL 1988;127:923-932.

10.1126/science.161.3838.238

Snowdon DA, Ostwald SK, Kane RL. Education, survival and independence in elderly Catholic sisters, 1936-1988.AmJEpidenioL 1989;130:999-1012.

Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up Progam Cooperative Group, 1987, HypeIension., 9, 641

Feldman JJ, Makuc DM, Kleinman JC, Cornoni-Huntley J. National trends in educational differentials in mortality. Am J EpidemioL 1989;129:919-933.

Sagan LA. 7he Healh of Nations. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc; 1987.

10.1016/S0021-9681(87)80045-0

10.2307/145822

Millar WJ, 1986, Can Med Assoc J., 134, 127

10.1016/0091-7435(90)90017-E

Howard MA, 1978, Child Welfare., 57, 221

Bunker JP, Gomby DS. Preface. In: Bunker JP, Gomby DS, Kehrer BH, ed. Pathways to Healtk The Role of Social Factors. Menlo Park, Calif: Hemy J. Kaiser Foundation; 1989:15.

Cohen S, Syme SL. Social Support and Healt New York, NY: Academic Press; 1985.