Socioeconomic factors and use of psychotherapy in common mental disorders predisposing to disability pension

BMC Health Services Research - Tập 22 - Trang 1-12 - 2022
Helena Leppänen1,2, Olli Kampman1,3, Reija Autio4, Tino Karolaakso5, Turkka Näppilä6, Päivi Rissanen4, Sami Pirkola3,4
1Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
2Pirkkala Municipal Health Centre, Pirkkala, Finland
3Department of Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland
4Faculty of Social Sciences (Unit of Health Sciences), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
5Faculty of Social Sciences (Psychology), Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
6Tampere University Library, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Tóm tắt

Research in high-income countries has identified low socioeconomic status as a risk factor for disability pension (DP) due to common mental disorders (CMDs). Psychotherapy is an evidence-based treatment for the majority of CMDs along with medication and it is often targeted to prevent work disability. This study examines socioeconomic differences in the use of rehabilitative psychotherapy in Finland, where citizens have universal health coverage, but psychotherapy is partly dependent on personal finance. The study subjects (N = 22,501) were all the Finnish citizens granted a DP due to CMD between 2010 and 2015 and a comparison group (N = 57,732) matched based on age, gender, and hospital district. Socioeconomic differences in psychotherapy use were studied using logistic regression models. Socioeconomic status was defined by education, income, and occupation. Age, gender, and family status were also examined. A lower level of education, lower occupational status (blue-collar worker), male gender, and older age, were associated with less frequent psychotherapy use, in both groups. Education was the strongest component of socioeconomic status associated with psychotherapy use, but the role of income was not straightforward. Unemployment when approaching DP, but not otherwise, was a risk factor for not receiving rehabilitative psychotherapy. Socioeconomic disparities were not any smaller among CMD patients approaching DP than in the comparison group. This study demonstrates the disparity in the provision of psychotherapy for CMD patients, even on the verge of DP with an acute need for services. This disparity is partly related to a complex interplay of socioeconomic factors and the service system characteristics. Factors predisposing to unequal access to mental health services are presumably diverse and should be studied further.

Tài liệu tham khảo