Socio-technical transitions and policy change – Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions - Tập 18 - Trang 215-237 - 2016
Jochen Markard1, Marco Suter1, Karin Ingold2,3,4
1Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Department of Management, Technology and Economics, Group for Sustainability and Technology, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
2Institute of Political Science, University of Bern, Fabrikstrasse 8, Bern 3012, Switzerland
3Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Zähringerstrasse 25, Bern 3012, Switzerland
4Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, EAWAG, Überlandstrasse 133, Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Avelino, 2009, Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change, Eur. J. Soc. Theory, 12, 543, 10.1177/1368431009349830

Bakker, 2014, Actor rationales in sustainability transitions – interests and expectations regarding electric vehicle recharging, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 13, 60, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.08.002

Beyers, 2014, Ties that count: explaining interest group access to policymakers, Journal of Public Policy, 34, 93, 10.1017/S0143814X13000263

Bergek, 2008, Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis, Res. Policy, 37, 407, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003

Borup, 2006, The sociology of expectations in science and technology, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 18, 285, 10.1080/09537320600777002

Bosman, 2014, Discursive regime dynamics in the Dutch energy transition, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 13, 45, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.003

Coenen, 2010, Comparing systems approaches to innovation and technological change for sustainable and competitive economies: an explorative study into conceptual commonalities, differences and complementarities, J. Clean. Prod., 18, 1149, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.003

Elliott, 2001, The advocacy coalition framework: application to the policy process for the development of forest certification in Sweden, J. Eur. Public Policy, 8, 642, 10.1080/13501760110064438

EnG, 2012

Farla, 2012, Sustainability transitions in the making: a closer look at actors, strategies and resources, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 79, 991, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001

French, 1969, Effectiveness of the various techniques employed in the study of community power, J. Polit., 31, 818, 10.2307/2128502

Garud, 2010, Categorization by association: nuclear technology and emission-free electricity, 51, 10.1108/S0277-2833(2010)0000021007

Geels, 2005, Co-evolution of technology and society: the transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930) – a case study in multi-level perspective, Technol. Soc., 27, 363, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.008

Geels, 2005, The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: a multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930), Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 17, 445, 10.1080/09537320500357319

Geels, 2006, The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840–1930): the dynamics of regime transformation, Res. Policy, 35, 1069, 10.1016/j.respol.2006.06.001

Geels, 2010, Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective, Res. Policy, 39, 495, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022

Geels, 2011, The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 24, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002

Geels, 2007, Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Res. Policy, 36, 399, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003

Geels, 2010, The dynamics of sociotechnical transitions – a socio-technical perspective, 9

Geels, 2011, Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: a cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945–1986), Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 78, 910, 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.004

Grin, 2010, Understanding transitions from a governance perspective, 223

Grin, 2012, The politics of transition governance in Dutch agriculture: conceptual understanding and implications for transition management, Int. J. Sustain. Dev., 15, 72, 10.1504/IJSD.2012.044035

Grin, 2010

Hanneman, 2005

Heintz, 1988, Advocacy coalitions and the OCS leasing debate: a case study in policy evolution, Policy Sci., 21, 213, 10.1007/BF00136408

Henry, 2011, Ideology, power, and the structure of policy networks, Policy Stud. J., 39, 361, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00413.x

Hess, 2014, Sustainability transitions: a political coalition perspective, Res. Policy, 43, 278, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.008

Ingold, 2011, Network structures within policy processes: coalitions, power, and brokerage in Swiss climate policy, Policy Stud. J., 39, 435, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x

Ingold, 2014, Drivers of collaboration to mitigate climate change: an illustration of Swiss climate policy over 15 years, Glob. Environ. Change, 24, 88, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.021

Ingold, 2014, Structural and institutional determinants of influence reputation: a comparison of collaborative and adversarial policy networks in decision making and implementation, J. Public Admin. Res. Theory, 10.1093/jopart/muu043

Ingold, 2012, Treating policy brokers seriously: evidence from the climate policy, J. Public Admin. Res. Theory, 22, 319, 10.1093/jopart/mur035

Jacobsson, 2006, The politics and policy of energy system transformation – explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology, Energy Policy, 34, 256, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029

Jegen, 2003

John, 2012

Jones, 1993

Kemp, 2006, Transition management: a reflexive governance approach, 103

Kern, 2009

Kern, 2011, Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability, Environ. Plan. C, 29, 1116, 10.1068/c1142

Kern, 2008, Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands, Energy Policy, 36, 4093, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.018

Knill, 2012

Knoke, 1993, Networks of elite structure and decision making, Sociol. Methods Res., 22, 23, 10.1177/0049124193022001002

Konrad, 2012, Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 79, 1084, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.008

Kriesi, 2001, The Swiss energy policy elite: the actor constellation of a policy domain in transition, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 39, 251, 10.1111/1475-6765.00577

Kuebler, 2007, Understanding the recent expansion of Swiss family policy: an idea-centred approach, J. Soc. Policy, 36, 217, 10.1017/S0047279406000572

Lawhon, 2012, Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: insights from political ecology, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 36, 354, 10.1177/0309132511427960

Leifeld, 2013, Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework: a discourse network analysis of German pension politics, Policy Stud. J., 41, 169, 10.1111/psj.12007

Lubell, 2003, Collaborative institutions, belief-systems, and perceived policy effectiveness, Polit. Res. Q., 56, 309, 10.1177/106591290305600306

Markard, 2012, Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Res. Policy, 41, 955, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013

Markard, 2008, Actor-oriented analysis of innovation systems: exploring micro-meso level linkages in the case of stationary fuel cells, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 20, 443, 10.1080/09537320802141429

Markard, 2008, Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework, Res. Policy, 37, 596, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004

Meadowcroft, 2011, Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 70, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003

Musiolik, 2011, Creating and shaping innovation systems: formal networks in the innovation system for stationary fuel cells in Germany, Energy Policy, 39, 1909, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.052

Musiolik, 2012, Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: towards a conceptual framework for system building, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 79, 1032, 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.003

Negro, 2008, The bumpy road of biomass gasification in The Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 57, 10.1016/j.techfore.2006.08.006

Nohrstedt, 2010, Do advocacy coalitions matter? Crisis and change in Swedish nuclear energy policy, J. Public Admin. Res. Theory, 20, 309, 10.1093/jopart/mun038

Ostrom, 1990

Raven, 2016, Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 18, 143, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002

Sabatier, 1998, The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe, J. Eur. Policy, 51, 98, 10.1080/13501768880000051

Sabatier, 2007

Sabatier, 1993

Sabatier, 1999, The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment, 117

Sabatier, 2007, The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications, 189

Scharpf, 1997

SFOE, 2012

SFOE, 2013

Shove, 2007, CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice and sustainable transition management, Environ. Plan. A, 39, 763, 10.1068/a39310

Smink, 2015, Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies, Bus. Strategy Environ., 24, 86, 10.1002/bse.1808

Smith, 2007, Moving outside or inside? Objectification and reflexivity in the governance of socio-technical systems, J. Environ. Policy Plan., 9, 351, 10.1080/15239080701622873

Smith, 2010, The politics of social–ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions, Ecol. Soc., 15, 11, 10.5751/ES-03218-150111

Smith, 2010, Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: the allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges, Res. Policy, 39, 435, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023

Solomon, 2011, The coming sustainable energy transition: history, strategies, and outlook, Energy Policy, 39, 7422, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.009

Stenzel, 2008, Regulating technological change – the strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets, Energy Policy, 36, 2645, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.007

Stokman, 1992, A two-stage model of policy analysis with an empirical test in the US energy policy domain, 219

Strunz, 2014, The German energy transition as a regime shift, Ecol. Econ., 100, 150, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.019

Sühlsen, 2014, Lobbying the ‘Energiewende’. Assessing the effectiveness of strategies to promote the renewable energy business in Germany, Energy Policy, 69, 316, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.018

Sutter, 2011

True, 2007, Punctuated-equilibrium theory, 155

Ulmanen, 2009, Biofuel developments in Sweden and the Netherlands: Protection and socio-technical change in a long-term perspective, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1406, 10.1016/j.rser.2008.10.001

Voß, 2006

Weible, 2005, Comparing policy networks: marine protected areas in California, Policy Stud. J., 33, 181, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00101.x

Weible, 2009, Themes and variations: taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework, Policy Stud. J., 37, 121, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x

Zafonte, 2001, Short-term versus long-term coalitions in the policy process: automotive pollution control, 1963–1989, Policy Stud. J., 32, 75, 10.1111/j.0190-292X.2004.00054.x