Social status and prosocial behavior
Tóm tắt
This paper studies the effects of social status—a socially recognized ranking of individuals—on prosocial behavior. We use a laboratory experiment and propose a theory to address this issue. In a one-shot game, two players, whose social status is either earned or randomly assigned, jointly make effort contributions to a project. Player 1 first suggests an effort level for each player to player 2 who then determines the actual effort levels. Deviation from the proposal is costly. We find causal evidence that high-status players are less selfish than their low-status counterparts. In particular, high-status players 2 provide relatively more effort, ceteris paribus, than those with low status. The experimental results and theoretical framework suggest that a high social ranking yields more social behavior and that this can be attributed to the sense of responsibility that it gives.
Tài liệu tham khảo
American Bar Association Report. (2018). Supporting Justice: A Report on the Pro Bono Work of America's Lawyers.
Amir, D., Jordan, M. R., & Rand, D. G. (2018). An uncertainty management perspective on long-run impacts of adversity: The influence of childhood socioeconomic status on risk, time, and social preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 217–226.
Anderson, C., John, A. D., & Laura, H. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601.
Andreoni, J., Nikos, N., & Stoop, J. (2017). Are the rich more selfish than the poor, or do they just have more money? A natural field experiment. (23229): https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:23229
Andreoni, J., & Lise, V. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 293–312.
Baldassarri, D., & Grossman, G. (2011). Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(27), 11023–11027.
Baldassarri, D., & Grossman, G. (2013). The effect of group attachment and social position on prosocial behavior. Evidence from lab-in-the-field experiments. PloS One, 8(3), e58750.
Ball, S. B., & Catherine C. E. (1998). Stars upon thars: Status and discrimination in ultimatum games. Technical report, Citeseer.
Ball, S. B., Eckel, Catherine, Philip, J., & Zame, W. (2001). Status in markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 161–188.
Bauer, M., Chytilová, J., & Pertold-Gebicka, B. (2014). Parental background and other-regarding preferences in children. Experimental Economics, 17(1), 24–46.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers.
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.
Bottorf, E. D. N. A. A. (1946). A study comparing art abilities and general intelligence of college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37(7), 398–426.
Brandts, J., Cooper, D. J., & Weber, R. A. (2015). Legitimacy, communication, and leadership in the turnaround game. Management Science, 61(11), 2627–2645.
Brandts, J., Güth, W., & Stiehler, A. (2006). I want you! An experiment studying motivational effects when assigning distributive power. Labour Economics, 13(1), 1–17.
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 817–869.
Chen, Y., Fangwen, L., & Zhang, J. (2017). Social comparisons, status and driving behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 155, 11–20.
Cohn, A., Fehr, E., & Maréchal, M. A. (2014). Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature, 516(7529), 86–89.
Cooper, D. J., & John, K. (2016). Other-regarding preferences (p. 217). Princeton University Press.
Côté, S., House, J., & Willer, R. (2015). High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(52), 15838–15843.
Cox, J. C., Friedman, D., & Gjerstad, S. (2007). A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness. Games and Economic Behavior, 59(1), 17–45.
Crawford, V. P., & Joel S. (1982). Strategic information transmission. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 1431–1451.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.
Dessein, W. (2002). Authority and communication in organizations. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(4), 811–838.
Drazen, A., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2019). Does ‘being chosen to lead’ induce non-selfish behavior? Experimental evidence on reciprocity. Journal of Public Economics, 174, 13–21.
Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 436.
Ebeling, F., Feldhaus, C., & Fendrich, J. (2017). A field experiment on the impact of a prior donor’s social status on subsequent charitable giving. Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 124–133.
Eckel, C. C., & Ball, S. B. (1996). Buying status: Experimental evidence on status in negotiation. Psychology and Marketing, 13(4), 381–405.
Eckel, C. C., Fatas, E., & Wilson, R. (2010). Cooperation and status in organizations. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12(4), 737–762.
Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2007). Social learning in coordination games: Does status matter? Experimental Economics, 10(3), 317–329.
Edelson, M. G., Rafael, P., Christian, C. R., Ernst, F., & Todd, A. H. (2018). Computational and neurobiological foundations of leadership decisions. Science, 361(6401), eaat0036.
Engelmann, D., & Strobel, M. (2004). Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. American Economic Review, 94(4), 857–869.
Fehr, E., & List, J. A. (2004). The hidden costs and returns of incentives-trust and trustworthiness among CEOs. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(5), 743–771.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868.
Fiddick, L., & Cummins, D. (2007). Are perceptions of fairness relationship-specific? The case of noblesse oblige. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 16–31.
Fiddick, L., Cummins, D. D., Janicki, M., Lee, S., & Erlich, N. (2013). A cross-cultural study of noblesse oblige in economic decision-making. Human Nature, 24(3), 318–335.
Fong, C. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public economics, 82(2), 225–246.
Galeotti, A., Ghiglino, C., & Squintani, F. (2013). Strategic information transmission networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 148(5), 1751–1769.
Glaeser, E. L., David, I. L., Jose, A. S., & Christine, L. S. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811–846.
Gsottbauer, E., Müller, D., Müller, S., Trautmann, S. T., & Zudenkova, G. (2022). Social class and (Un) ethical behaviour: Causal and correlational evidence. The Economic Journal, 132(647), 2392–2411.
Guinote, A., Cotzia, I., Sandhu, S., & Siwa, P. (2015). Social status modulates prosocial behavior and egalitarianism in preschool children and adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(3), 731–736.
Harbaugh, W. T., Kate K., & Steven J. L. (2003). Bargaining by children. University of Oregon Economics Working Paper.
Harsanyi, J. C. (1966). A bargaining model for social status in informal groups and formal organizations. Behavioral Science, 11(5), 357–369.
Heffetz, O., & Frank, R. H. (2010). Preferences for status: Evidence and economic implications (pp. 69–91). Elsevier.
Hoffman, E., & Spitzer, M. L. (1985). Entitlements, rights, and fairness: An experimental examination of subjects’ concepts of distributive justice. The Journal of Legal Studies, 14(2), 259–297.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.
Hong, K., & Bohnet, I. (2007). Status and distrust: The relevance of inequality and betrayal aversion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(2), 197–213.
Jung, M. H., Paul, S., Jan, S., & Joachim, V. (2023). Social status and unethical behavior: Two replications of the field studies in Piff et al. (2012). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
Kocher, M. G., Pogrebna, G., & Sutter, M. (2013). Other-regarding preferences and management styles. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 88, 109–132.
Kumru, C. S., & Vesterlund, L. (2010). The effect of status on charitable giving. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 12(4), 709–735.
Liebe, U., & Tutic, A. (2010). Status groups and altruistic behaviour in dictator games. Rationality and Society, 22(3), 353–380.
List, J. A. (2004). Young, selfish and male: Field evidence of social preferences. The Economic Journal, 114(492), 121–149.
Médecins Sans Frontières. (2018). International Activity Report.
Mujcic, R., & Leibbrandt, A. (2018). Indirect reciprocity and prosocial behaviour: Evidence from a natural field experiment. The Economic Journal, 128(611), 1683–1699.
Nettle, D., Agathe, C., & Maria, C. (2011). Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city. PloS One, 6(10), e26922.
Nikiforakis, N., Oechssler, J., & Shah, A. (2014). Hierarchy, coercion, and exploitation: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 97, 155–168.
Oswald, A. J., Proto, E., & Sgroi, D. (2015). Happiness and productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(4), 789–822.
Silva, A. S., & Mace, R. (2014). Cooperation and conflict: Field experiments in Northern Ireland. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1792), 20141435.
Silva, A. S., & Mace, R. (2015). Inter-group conflict and cooperation: Field experiments before, during and after sectarian riots in Northern Ireland. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1790.
Smeets, P., Bauer, R., & Gneezy, U. (2015). Giving behavior of millionaires. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(34), 10641–10644.
Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments, ed. DD Raphael & AL Macfie. Liberty Fund. (Original work published in 1759.) [ELK].
Trautmann, S. T., Van De Kuilen, G., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2013). Social class and (Un) ethical behavior: A framework, with evidence from a large population sample. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 487–497.
Weiss, Y., & Fershtman, C. (1998). Social status and economic performance: A survey. European Economic Review, 42(3–5), 801–820.
Zhang, J., & Xie, H. (2019). Hierarchy leadership and social distance in charitable giving. Southern Economic Journal, 86(2), 433–458.
Di Zheng, J., Schram, A. J. H. C., & Doğan, G. (2021). Friend or Foe: Social ties in bribery and corruption. Experimental Economics, 24, 854–882.