Social security reforms, capital accumulation, and welfare: A notional defined contribution system vs a modified PAYG system

Shiyu Li1, Shuanglin Lin2,3
1Financial Policy Research Center, School of Finance, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
2HSBC Business School, Peking University, Shenzhen, China
3National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing, China

Tóm tắt

This paper studies social security reforms in a model with declining population growth and increasing life expectancy. Based on simulations using data on China, it is found that a switch from a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) system to a notional defined contribution system favors the rich, causes the poor to work more, and may change the capital-effective labor ratio depending on the rate of return to personal accounts. A switch from the PAYG system to a modified PAYG system that saves part of the receipts, with the interest rate greater than the growth rate, increases labor supply and decreases the capital-effective labor ratio in period one; decreases labor supply and increases the capital-effective labor ratio after period one; and hurts the poor old more than the rich old while benefitting the poor in future generations more than the rich. If the interest rate is less than the growth rate, the accumulated funds are insufficient to balance the social security budget.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aaron HJ (1977) Demographic effects on the equity of social security benefits. In: Feldstein MS, Inman RP (eds) The economics of public services International economic association conference volumes. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 151–173 Altig D, Auerbach AJ, Kotlikoff LJ, Smetters KA, Walliser J (2001) Simulating fundamental tax reform in the United States. Am Econ Rev 91(3):574–595 Auerbach AJ, Kotlikoff LJ (1987) Dynamic fiscal Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Auerbach AJ, Lee R (2009) Notional defined contribution pension systems in a stochastic context: design and stability. In: Brown J, Liebman J, Wise DA (eds) Social security policy in a changing environment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 43–68 Auerbach AJ, Lee R (2011) Welfare and generational equity in sustainable unfunded pension systems. J Public Econ 95(1–2):16–27 Auerbach AJ, Kueng L, Lee R, Yatsynovich Y (2018) Propagation and smoothing of shocks in alternative social security systems. J Public Econ 164:91–105 Auerbach AJ, Cai J, Kotlikoff LJ (1991) US demographics and saving: predictions of three saving models. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 34(135):156 Baldanzi A, Prettner K, Tscheuschner P (2019) Longevity-induced vertical innovation and the tradeoff between life and growth. J Popul Econ 32(4):1293–1313 Barnett RC, Bhattacharya J, Puhakka M (2018) Private versus public old-age security. J Popul Econ 31(3):703–746 Barr N, Diamond P (2010) Pension reform in China: issues, options and recommendations. China Economic Research and Advisory Program (CERAP) MIT Economics website. https://economics.mit.edu/people/faculty/peterdiamond/publications. Accessed 10 Mar 2020 Blanchard OJ (1985) Debt, deficits, and finite horizons. J Polit Econ 93(2):223–247 Bonenkamp J, Meijdam L, Ponds E, Westerhout E (2017) Ageing-driven pension reforms. J Popul Econ 30(3):953–976 Börsch-Supan A (2005) From traditional DB to notional DC systems: the pension reform process in Sweden, Italy, and Germany. J Eur Econ Assoc 3(2/3):458–465 Börsch-Supan A, Härtl K, Leite DN, Ludwig A (2023) Preventing reforming unequally. J Popul Econ 36(4):2889–2924 Cerda RA (2005) On social security financial crisis. J Popul Econ 18(3):509–517 China Ministry of Finance (2021) National social insurance funds revenue in 2020. China Ministry of Finance website. http://yss.mof.gov.cn/2020zyjs/202109/t20210917_3753546.htm. Accessed 10 Apr 2022 China National Bureau of Statistics (1997) The gross domestic product of China 1952–1995. Dongbei University of Finance and Economics Press, Dalian China National Bureau of Statistics (2021) China population and employment statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing China National Bureau of Statistics (2022) National data database. China National Bureau of Statistics website. https://data.stats.gov.cn/. Accessed 10 Apr 2022 Cigno A (2010) How to avoid a pension crisis: a question of intelligent system design. CEifo Econ Stud 56(1):21–37 Cigno A, Rosati FC (1992) The effects of financial markets and social security on saving and fertility behaviour in Italy. J Popul Econ 5(4):319–341 Cigno A, Rosati FC (1996) Jointly determined saving and fertility behaviour: theory, and estimates for Germany, Italy UK and USA. Eur Econ Rev 40(8):1561–1589 Cigno A, Casolaro L, Rosati FC (2003) The impact of social security on saving and fertility in Germany. Finanzarchiv 59(2):189–211 Cipriani GP (2014) Population aging and PAYG pensions in the OLG model. J Popul Econ 27(1):251–256 Congress of the United States (1983) Social security amendments of 1983. The United States Congress website. https://www.congress.gov/bill/98thcongress/housebill/1900. Accessed 10 Apr 2020 Diamond P (1965) National debt in a neoclassical growth model. Am Econ Rev 55(5):1126–1150 Diamond P (1996) Proposals to restructure social security. J Econ Perspect 10(3):67–88 Fanti L, Gori L (2012) Fertility and PAYG pensions in the overlapping generations model. J Popul Econ 25(3):955–961 Fehr H (2000) Pension reform during the demographic transition. Scand J Econ 102(3):419–443 Fehr H (2016) CGE modeling social security reforms. J Policy Model 38(3):475–494 Fehr H, Habermann C (2008) Risk sharing and efficiency implications of progressive pension arrangements. Scand J Econ 110(2):419–443 Fehr H, Sterkeby WI, Thøgersen Ø (2003) Social security reforms and early retirement. J Popul Econ 16(2):345–361 Feldstein M (1974) Social security, induced retirement, and aggregate capital accumulation. J Polit Econ 82(5):905–926 Feldstein M (1996) Social security and saving: new time series evidence. Natl Tax J 49(2):151–164 Feldstein M (1999) Social security pension reform in China. China Econ Rev 10(2):99–107 Feldstein M, Samwick A (1996) The transition path in privatizing social security. NBER Working Paper No. 5761. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5761 Feldstein M (1995) Would privatizing social security raise economic welfare? NBER Working Paper No.5218. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5281 Fuster L, İmrohoroğlu A, İmrohoroğlu S (2003) A welfare analysis of social security in a dynastic framework. Int Econ Rev 44(4):1247–1274 Futagami K, Konishi K (2019) Rising longevity, fertility dynamics, and R&D-based growth. J Popul Econ 32(2):591–620 Greenspan Commission (1983) Report of the national commission on social Security reform. The United States Social Security Administration website. https://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/gspan.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2021 Gruber J, Wise D (1997) Social security programs and retirement around the World. NBER Working Paper Series No. 6134. https://doi.org/10.3386/w6134 Holzmann R (2017) The ABCs of non-financial defined contribution schemes. Int Soc Secur Rev 70(3):53–77 Kotlikoff LJ (1979) Testing the theory of social security and life cycle accumulation. Am Econ Rev 69(3):396–410 Kotlikoff LJ (1996a) Privatization of social security: how it works and why It matters. Tax Policy Econ 10:1–32 Kotlikoff LJ (1996b) Privatizing social security at home and abroad. Am Econ Rev 86(2):368–372 Kotlikoff LJ, Smetters KA, Walliser J (1998) Social security: privatization and progressivity. Am Econ Rev 88(2):137–141 Kotlikoff LJ, Smetters KA, Walliser J (2007) Mitigating America’s demographic dilemma by pre-funding social security. J Monet Econ 54(2):247–266 Laun T, Markussen S, Vigtel TC, Wallenius J (2019) Health, longevity and retirement reform. J Econ Dyn Control 103:123–157 Le Garrec G (2015) Increased longevity and social security reform: questioning the optimality of individual accounts when education matters. J Popul Econ 28(2):329–352 Lee R, Sánchez-Romero M (2019) Overview of heterogeneity in longevity and pension schemes. In: Holzmann R, Palmer E, Palacios R, Sacchi S (eds) Progress and challenges of nonfinancial defined contribution pension schemes: Addressing marginalization, polarization, and the labor market, 1st edn. World Bank, Washington DC, pp 261–279 Lefèbvre ML, Pestieau P, Ponthiere G (2019) Premature mortality and poverty measurement in an OLG economy. J Popul Econ 32(2):621–664 Leroux ML, Ponthiere G (2018) Working time regulation, unequal lifetimes and fairness. Soc Choice Welf 51:437–464 Leroux ML, Pestieau P, Ponthiere G (2021) Fair long-term care insurance. Soc Choice Welf 57(3):503–533 Li S, Lin S (2011) Is there any gain from social security privatization? China Econ Rev 22(3):278–289 Li S, Lin S (2016) Population aging and China’s social security reforms. J Policy Model 38(1):65–95 Li C, Lin S (2019) China’s explicit social security debt: How large? China Econ Rev 53:128–139 Li S, Lin S (2023) Housing property tax, economic growth, and intergenerational welfare: the case of China. Int Rev Econ Financ 83:233–251 Lin S (1998) Labor income taxation and human capital accumulation. J Public Econ 68(2):291–302 Lin S, Tian X (2003) Population growth and social security financing. J Popul Econ 16(1):91–110 Mateos-Planas X (2010) Demographics and the politics of capital taxation in a life-cycle economy. Am Econ Rev 100(1):337–363 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2015) The growing gap in life expectancy by income: implications for federal programs and policy responses. The National Academies Press, Washington DC Ono T (2003) Social security policy with public debt in an aging economy. J Popul Econ 16(2):363–387 Persson T (1985) Deficits and intergenerational welfare in open economies. J Int Econ 19(1–2):67–84 Pestieau P, Ponthiere G (2013) Childbearing age, family allowances, and social security. South Econ J 80(2):385–413 Pestieau P, Ponthiere G (2014) Optimal fertility along the life cycle. Econ Theory 55:185–224 Pestieau P, Ponthiere G (2016) Longevity variations and the welfare state. J Demogr Econ 82(2):207–239 Pestieau P, Ponthiere G (2017) Optimal fertility under age-dependent labour productivity. J Popul Econ 30(2):621–646 Pestieau P, Ponthiere G, Sato M (2008) Longevity, health spending, and pay-as-you-go pensions. FinanzArchiv 64(1):1–18 Ponthiere G (2020) A theory of reverse retirement. J Public Econ Theory 22(5):1618–1659 Sanchez-Romero M, Lee RD, Prskawetz A (2020) Redistributive effects of different pension systems when longevity varies by socioeconomic status. J Econ Ageing 17:100259 Schön M (2023) Demographic change and the rate of return in pay-as-you-go pension systems. J Popul Econ 36(3):1799–1827 Sibert A (1990) Taxing capital in a large open economy. J Public Econ 41(3):297–317 Social Security and Medicare Boards of Trustees (2022) Status of the Social Security and Medicare Programs: A Summary of the 2022 Annual Reports. The United States Social Security Administration website. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/TRSUM/#:~:text=The%20Old%2DAge%20and%20Survivors,later%20than%20reported%20last%20year. Accessed 28 June 2022 Svahn JA, Ross M (1983) Social security amendments of 1983: legislative history and summary of provisions. Soc Secur Bull 46(7):3–48 Takahashi S, Yamada K (2022) Understanding international differences in the skill premium: The role of capital taxes and transfers. J Econ Dyn Control 143:104511 Tarkiainen L, Martikainen P, Laaksonen M (2013) The changing relationship between income and mortality in Finland, 1988–2007. J Epidemiol Commun Health 67(1):21–27 The Institute of Social Science Survey of Peking University (2018) The China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). https://www.isss.pku.edu.cn/cfps/en/index.htm The State Council (2005) The decision on improving the basic social security system for workers and staffs in enterprises the state council website. https://www.gov.cn/zwgk/200512/14/content_127311.htm. Accessed 10 March 2020 The United States Social Security Administration (2022) Trust fund data. Old Age, survivors, and disability insurance trust funds, 1957 2021. The United States Social Security Administration website. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/. Accessed 25 Mar 2022 United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2020) World population prospects: the 2019 revision, DVD. United Nations, New York Valdés-Prieto S (2000) The financial stability of notional account pensions. Scand J Econ 102(3):395–417 Williamson JB, Williams M (2005) Notional defined contribution accounts: neoliberal ideology and the political economy of pension reform. Ame J Econ Sociol 64(2):485–506 Wu Q, Dai L, Zhen Q, Gu L, Wang Y (2021) User guide for China family panel studies 2018. Institute of Social Science Survey. Peking University, Beijing Yuan C, Li C, Johnston LA (2018) The intergenerational education spillovers of pension reform in China. J Popul Econ 31(3):671–701 Zhang X, Palivos T, Liu X (2022) Aging and automation in economies with search frictions. J Popul Econ 35(2):621–642