Social influence on sustainable consumption: evidence from a behavioural experiment

International Journal of Consumer Studies - Tập 37 Số 2 - Trang 172-180 - 2013
Helen Arce Salazar1, L.A.G. Oerlemans2, Saskia van Stroe‐Biezen1
1Department of Innovation Management in International Perspective, Fontys International School of Economics (FIHE), Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Venlo, The Netherlands
2Department of Organisation Studies and Center for Innovation Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

AbstractAlthough social influence on consumers’ behaviour has been recognized and documented, the vast majority of empirical consumer studies about sustainable products considers mainly, if not only, individual characteristics (socio‐demographic attributes, individual environmental attitudes, etc.), to explain the decision to buy sustainable products. Making use of experimental methods, this paper studies the social influence that peer groups like colleagues, family and friends may exert in the decision to choose for environmentally friendly products rather than conventional ones. We also test for different types of social influence, in particular for ‘herd behaviour’ vs. ‘social learning’. In our experimental setting, the relevance of peer effects is corroborated. We find clear evidence for ‘herd behaviour’ and the data indirectly support the presence of ‘social learning’ effects. The results also suggest heterogeneous impact of specific social groups.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/001872677402700101

Bandura A., 1977, Social Learning Theory

10.2307/2118364

Beckers T.A.M. Harkink E.W.F.P.M. van Ingen E.J. Lampert M.A. vand der Lelij B.&van Ossenbruggen R.(2004)Social appreciation on sustainable development. Bilthoven RIVM Report 50013007/2004.

10.1257/jep.12.3.151

10.2307/1244086

Boyd R., 1985, Culture and the Evolutionary Process

10.1086/208633

10.1111/0002-9092.00188

10.1257/0002828041464461

10.1086/209296

10.1017/CBO9781139167611

10.1515/9780691233376

10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00241-7

10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00869.x

Douglas M., 1979, The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption

10.1086/601447

10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00896.x

10.1016/j.futures.2004.10.016

Gladwell M., 2000, The Tipping Point. How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference

10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00965.x

10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.004

10.1086/228311

10.1108/00251741111130832

Iyengar R. Han S.&Gupta S.(2009)Do friends influence purchases in a social network?Harvard Business School: Working Paper 09‐123.

10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00063-0

10.1002/bse.690

10.1108/07363761111101930

10.2307/3038290

10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.02.008

10.1108/EUM0000000006155

10.2307/1882692

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.002

Merton R.K., 1949, Social Theory and Social Structure, 225

10.1509/jmkg.66.2.17.18480

10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x

10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.12.002

10.1177/0013916501332002

10.1086/208685

10.2307/1927192

10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss154

10.1016/S0007-6813(96)90087-7

10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60114-0

Rogers E.M., 1983, Diffusion of Innovations

10.1086/208971

10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00064.x

Veblen T., 1899, The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study on Institutions

10.1007/s00712-005-0153-7

10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007

10.2307/257088

10.1016/j.jretconser.2009.08.005