Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept

Bansal, 2000, Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717, 10.2307/1556363

Bell, 2005, The ‘Social Gap’ in wind farm citing decisions: explanations and policy responses, Environmental Politics, 14, 460, 10.1080/09644010500175833

Bird, 2002, A review of international green power markets: recent experience, trends, and market drivers, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 6, 513, 10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00033-3

BPA, 2003. (German Federal Public Relations Office) Bewertung der Struktur der Energieversorgung—Ergebnisse einer Repräsentativbefragung, Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach, 〈http://www.bmu.de/files/meinungen_energiepolitik_031100.pdf〉

Bosley, 1988, Public acceptability of California's wind energy developments: three studies, Wind Engineering, 12, 311

Breukers, S., Wolsink, M., 2007. Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.004.

Carlman, I., 1982. Wind energy potential in Sweden: the importance of non-technical factors. In: Fourth International Symposium on Wind Energy Systems. September 21–24, 1982, Stockholm, pp. 335–348.

Carlman, I., 1984. The views of politicians and decision-makers on planning for the use of wind power in Sweden. In: European Wind Energy Conference, 22–36 October 1984, Hamburg, pp. 339–343.

Cowell, 2006, Governing space: planning reform and the politics of sustainability, Environment and Planning C–Government and Policy, 24, 403, 10.1068/c0416j

Ek, 2005, Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power, Energy Policy, 33, 1677, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.02.005

Eurobarometer, 2003. Energy: issues, options and technologies, science and society. A report produced by The European Opinion Research Group (EORG) for the Directorate-General for Research, Luxembourg.

Firestone, 2007, Public opinion about large offshore wind power: underlying factors, Energy Policy, 35, 584, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010

Gross, C., 2007. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia. The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013.

Hirsh, 1989

Huijts, N.M.A., Midden, C.J.H , Meijnders, A.L, 2007. Public acceptance of carbon dioxide storage. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.007.

Jobert, A., Laborgne, P., Mimler, S., 2007. Local acceptance of wind energy. Factors of success identified in French and German case studies. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.005.

Mallett, A., 2007. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovations: the role of technology cooperation in urban Mexico. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.008.

Maruyama, Y., Nishikido, M., Iida, T., 2007. Wind power and society interaction in Japan: along the rise of community wind power. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.010.

McDaniel, 1983, Economic and social foundations of solar energy, Environmental Ethics, 5, 155, 10.5840/enviroethics1983521

Nadaï, A., 2007. “Planning”, “siting” and the local acceptance of wind power: Some Lessons from the French case. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.003.

O’Hare, 1977, “Not on MY block you don’t”: facility siting and the strategic importance of compensation, Public Policy, 25, 407

Owens, 2004, Siting, sustainable development and social priorities, Journal of Risk Research, 7, 101, 10.1080/1366987042000158686

Rogers, 1995

Sauter, R., Watson, J., 2007. Strategies for the deployment of micro generation: implications for social acceptance. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.006.

Sieferle, R. P., 1982. Der unterirdische Wald: Energiekrise und industrielle Revolution. München: Beck.

Slovic, 1993, Perceived risk, trust and democracy, Risk Analysis, 13, 675, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x

Simon, A., Wüstenhagen, R., 2006. Factors influencing the acceptance of wind energy in Switzerland, poster presented at the workshop “Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation”, Tramelan (Switzerland), 2006. 〈http://www.iwoe.unisg.ch/energy〉.

Stern, N., 2006. stern review on the economics of climate change, : accelerating technological innovation. Report to the UK Prime Minister and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, chapter 16 〈http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/9A3/57/Ch_16_accelerating_technological_innovation.pdf〉.

Toke, D., Breukers, S., Wolsink, M., 2008. Wind power deployment outcomes: how can we account for the differences? Renewable and Sustainable energy Reviews 12, in press. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021.

Thayer, R.L., 1988. The aesthetics of wind energy in the United States: case studies in public perception. European Community Wind Energy Conference, Herning, DK, June 6–8. pp.470–476.

Troncoso, K., Castillo, A., Masera, O., Merino, L., 2007. Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking—case study in rural Mexico. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.011.

Van der Horst, D., 2007. Nimby or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012.

Wolsink, 1987, Wind power for the electricity supply of houses, Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research, 2, 195, 10.1007/BF02497872

Wolsink, 2003, Reshaping the Dutch planning system: a learning process?, Environment and Planning A, 35, 705, 10.1068/a35173

Wolsink, 2006, Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31, 85, 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00191.x

Wolsink, M., 2007. Planning of renewables schemes. Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy 35 (5), in press. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002.

Wüstenhagen, 2003, Diffusion of green power products in Switzerland, Energy Policy, 31, 621, 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00147-7