Social Marketisation and Policy Influence of Third Sector Organisations: Evidence from the UK

Jun Han1
1Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Tóm tắt

The marketisation of social sector organisations or social marketisation emerged and spread around the world in the past three decades. In contrast with existing literature which claims that social marketisation makes social sector organisations reduce their efforts on advocacy and thus harms a civil society, this research argues that social marketisation is positively contributed to the influence of third sector organisations on government policies, and thus it strengthens civil society, rather than erodes it. Based on the National Survey of Charities and Social Enterprises in the UK, the results of regression analyses indicate clearly that, when other factors are equal, the two indicators of social marketisation, social entrepreneurship and achieving government contracts for purchasing services, are both statistically significant in estimating the level of policy influence of third sector organisations. The contribution of this research is that it finds a positive, instead of a negative, relationship between social marketisation and the perceived policy influence of third sector organisations.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Aldrich, H. E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 79–105. Almog-Bar, Michal, & Schmid, Hillel. (2014). Advocacy activities of nonprofit human service organizations: A critical review. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 43(1), 11–35. Andrews, K. T., & Edwards, B. (2004). Advocacy organizations in the U.S. Political process. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 479–506. Bass, G. D., Arons, D. F., Guinane, K., Carter, M. F., & Rees, S. (2007). Seen but not heard: Strengthening nonprofit advocacy. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute. Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (2001). Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1191–1213. Child, C. D., & Grønbjerg, K. A. (2007). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Their characteristics and activities. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 259–281. Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4), 411–424. Dees, J. G. (1998). “The meaning of social entrepreneurship.” Stanford University: Center for social innovation, graudate school of business. https://entrepreneurship.duke.edu/news-item/the-meaning-of-social-entrepreneurship/ DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. Donaldson, L. P. (2007). Advocacy by nonprofit human service agencies. Journal of Community Practice, 15(3), 139–158. Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 582–596. Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. Hall, K., Alcock, P., & Millar, R. (2012). Start up and sustainability: marketisation and the social enterprise investment fund in england. Journal of Social Policy, 41(04), 733–749. Han, J. (2016). The emergence of social corporatism in China: Nonprofit organizations, private foundations and the state. The China Review, 16(2), 27–53. Han, J. (2013). The state of social enterprises and the criteria of SE certification in the UK (in Chinese). In J. Xu (Ed.), China third sector research (pp. 106–115). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press. Hsu, J. Y. J., Hsu, C. L., & Hasmath, R (2016). “NGO strategies in an authoritarian context, and their implications for citizenship: The case of the People’s Republic of China.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations:1–23. Jenkins, J. Craig. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1), 527–553. Ljubownikow, S., & Crotty, J. (2015). Nonprofit influence on public policy: exploring nonprofit advocacy in Russia. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly:1–19. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1988). Social movements. In J. Neil (Ed.), Handbook of sociology. Smelserm. Newbury Park; London: Sage. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. McKay, S., Moro, D, Teasdale, S, & Clifford, D (2015). “The marketisation of Charities in England and Wales. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26:336–354. Meyer, John W., & Richard Scott, W. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills; London: Sage Publications. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. Mosley, J. E. (2010). Organizational resources and environmental incentives: Understanding the policy advocacy involvement of human service nonprofits. Social Service Review, 84(1), 57–76. Newman, J. (2007). Rethinking ‘the public’ in troubled times. Public Policy and Administration, 22(1), 27–47. Nicholls, A (Ed.). (2006). Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change: Oxford University Press. Nicholson-Crotty, Jill. (2007). Politics, policy, and the motivations for advocacy in nonprofit reproductive health and family planning providers. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 36(1), 5–21. Nickel, P. M., & Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). A critique of the discourse of marketized philanthropy. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(7), 974–989. Pfeffer, J., & Salanick, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press. Salamon, L. M. (1993). The marketization of welfare: Changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state. Social Service Review, 67(1), 16–39. Schmid, H., Bar, M., & Nirel, R. (2008). Advocacy activities in nonprofit human service organizations: Implications for policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(4), 581–602. Schmitter, Philippe C. (1974). Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85–131. Scott, W. R. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 1–21. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.; London: SAGE Publications. Scott, W. R., & Christensen, S. (1995). The institutional construction of organizations: International and longitudinal studies. California, London: Thousand Oaks, Sage. Scott, W. R., & John W. M. (Eds.). (1994). Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Thousand Oaks, Calif; London Sage. Suárez, D. F., & Hwang, H. (2008). Civic engagement and nonprofit lobbying in California, 1998–2003. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(1), 93–112. Weisbrod, Burton A. (2000). To profit or not to profit: the commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Young, D. R., Salamon, L. M., & Grinsfelder M. C. (2012). “Commercialization, Social Ventures, and For-Profit Competition.” Pp. 521–548 in The State of Nonprofit America, edited by Lester M. Salamon. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional Theories of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(1), 443–464.