Social Equity Matters in Payments for Ecosystem Services
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
2003, Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met?, Oryx, 37, 238, 10.1017/S0030605303000413
2013, A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: Embedding social considerations, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 194, 10.1890/110205
2011, On biodiversity conservation and poverty traps, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 13907, 10.1073/pnas.1011521108
2014, What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program, Land Use Policy, 36, 122, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.002
2006, Eviction for conservation: A global overview, Conservation and Society, 4, 424
2012, Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement, BioScience, 62, 744, 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7
2012, Social safeguards and co-benefits in REDD+: A review of the adjacent possible, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 654, 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.08.006
2007, The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services, Development and Change, 38, 587, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x
2008, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues, Ecological Economics, 65, 663, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
2002, Psychological foundations of incentives, European Economic Review, 46, 687, 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00208-2
2011, Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services, Progress in Physical Geography, 35, 613, 10.1177/0309133311421708
2012, Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: Exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness, Oryx, 46, 24, 10.1017/S0030605311001372
2013, Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs among social equity, economic return, and conservation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 6229, 10.1073/pnas.1217689110
2010, Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity, Conservation Biology, 25, 259
2011, When formal and market-based conservation mechanisms disrupt food sovereignty: Impacts of community conservation and payments for environmental services on an indigenous community of Oaxaca, Mexico, International Forestry Review, 13, 318, 10.1505/146554811798293935
2008, Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9465, 10.1073/pnas.0705503104
2011, Implementing REDD+: Lessons from analysis of forest governance, Environmental Science and Policy, 14, 111, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.007
2011, Identifying governance strategies that effectively support ecosystem services, resource sustainability, and biodiversity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 5308, 10.1073/pnas.1007933108
2013, Social norms and global environmental challenges: The complex interaction of behaviors, values, and policy, BioScience, 63, 164, 10.1525/bio.2013.63.3.5
2013, The quest for the “optimal” payment for environmental services program: Ambition meets reality, with useful lessons, Forest Policy and Economics, 37, 65, 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.007
2013, Whose environmental justice? Exploring local and global perspectives in a payments for ecosystem services scheme in Rwanda, Geoforum, 54, 167
1999, Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism, Environment and Planning D, 17, 133, 10.1068/d170133
2013, Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services, Environmental Science and Policy, 33, 416, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006
2011, Feedbacks between conservation and social–ecological systems, Conservation Biology, 26, 218
2012, Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: What works and what doesn’t, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28, 69, 10.1093/oxrep/grs009
2013, Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win–win solutions, Conservation Letters, 6, 274, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x
2007, A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15181, 10.1073/pnas.0702288104
2009, Restoration of ecosystem services for environmental markets, Science, 325, 575, 10.1126/science.1172976
2010, Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach, Ecological Economics, 69, 1237, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004
2010, Show me the money: Do payments supply environmental services in developing countries?, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4, 254, 10.1093/reep/req006
2010, Listening to locals on payment for environmental services, Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1139
2010, Fair and green? Social impacts of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica
2013, Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human–environment relationships, BioScience, 63, 536, 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7
2011, REDD+ and the indigenous question: A case study from Ecuador, Forests, 2, 525, 10.3390/f2020525
2012, Reducing REDD risks: Affirmative policy on an uneven playing field, International Journal of the Commons, 6, 233, 10.18352/ijc.322
2013, Understanding and managing conservation conflicts, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28, 100, 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021
1985, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance
2012, Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future
2012, Human responses to unfairness with primary rewards and their biological limits, Scientific Reports, 2
2006, The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation, Conservation Biology, 21, 45
2013, When payments for environmental services will work for conservation, Conservation Letters, 6, 230, 10.1111/conl.12034