Social Equity Matters in Payments for Ecosystem Services

BioScience - Tập 64 Số 11 - Trang 1027-1036 - 2014
Unai Pascual1,2,3, Jacob Phelps1,2,3, Eneko Garmendia1,2,3, Katrina Brown1,2,3, Esteve Corbera1,2,3, Adrian Martin1,2,3, Erik Gómez-Baggethun1,2,3, Roldán Muradian1,2,3
1EG-B is also affiliated with the Environmental Change Institute, in the School of Geography and the Environment at the University of Oxford, in Oxford, United Kindgom, and with the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, in Oslo. Adrian Martin is affiliated with the School of International Development at the University of East Anglia, in Norwich, United Kingdom. Roldan Muradian is affiliated with the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro and with the Universidade Federal Fluminense, in Brazil.
2UP is also affiliated with the Department of Land Economy, and EG is also affiliated with the Department of Geography at the University of Cambridge, in Cambridge, United Kingdom. Jacob Phelps () is affiliated with the Center for International Forestry Research (Jalan CIFOR), in Bogor, Indonesia and with the Department of Biological Sciences at the National University of Singapore. Katrina Brown is affiliated with the Environment and Sustainability Institute at the University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, in Exeter, the United Kingdom. Esteve Corbera and Erik Gomez-Baggethun are affiliated with the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, in Barcelona, Spain
3Unai Pascual () and Eneko Garmendia are affiliated with the Basque Foundation for Science (Ikerbasque) and with the Basque Centre for Climate Change, both in Bilbao, Spain

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2003, Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met?, Oryx, 37, 238, 10.1017/S0030605303000413

2013, A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: Embedding social considerations, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 194, 10.1890/110205

2011, On biodiversity conservation and poverty traps, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 13907, 10.1073/pnas.1011521108

2014, What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program, Land Use Policy, 36, 122, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.002

2006, Eviction for conservation: A global overview, Conservation and Society, 4, 424

2012, Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement, BioScience, 62, 744, 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7

2012, Social safeguards and co-benefits in REDD+: A review of the adjacent possible, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 654, 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.08.006

2012, Ecosystem services: Heed social goals, Science, 335, 655, 10.1126/science.335.6069.655-c

2007, The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services, Development and Change, 38, 587, 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x

2008, Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues, Ecological Economics, 65, 663, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011

2002, Psychological foundations of incentives, European Economic Review, 46, 687, 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00208-2

2002, Direct payments to conserve biodiversity, Science, 298, 1718, 10.1126/science.1078104

2011, Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services, Progress in Physical Geography, 35, 613, 10.1177/0309133311421708

2012, Payments for ecosystem services in an African protected area: Exploring issues of legitimacy, fairness, equity and effectiveness, Oryx, 46, 24, 10.1017/S0030605311001372

2013, Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs among social equity, economic return, and conservation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 6229, 10.1073/pnas.1217689110

2010, Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity, Conservation Biology, 25, 259

2011, When formal and market-based conservation mechanisms disrupt food sovereignty: Impacts of community conservation and payments for environmental services on an indigenous community of Oaxaca, Mexico, International Forestry Review, 13, 318, 10.1505/146554811798293935

2008, Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9465, 10.1073/pnas.0705503104

2011, Implementing REDD+: Lessons from analysis of forest governance, Environmental Science and Policy, 14, 111, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.007

2011, Identifying governance strategies that effectively support ecosystem services, resource sustainability, and biodiversity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 5308, 10.1073/pnas.1007933108

2011, Paying for ecosystem services—Promise and peril, Science, 334, 603, 10.1126/science.1210297

2013, Social norms and global environmental challenges: The complex interaction of behaviors, values, and policy, BioScience, 63, 164, 10.1525/bio.2013.63.3.5

2013, The quest for the “optimal” payment for environmental services program: Ambition meets reality, with useful lessons, Forest Policy and Economics, 37, 65, 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.007

2013, Whose environmental justice? Exploring local and global perspectives in a payments for ecosystem services scheme in Rwanda, Geoforum, 54, 167

1999, Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism, Environment and Planning D, 17, 133, 10.1068/d170133

2013, Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services, Environmental Science and Policy, 33, 416, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006

2011, Feedbacks between conservation and social–ecological systems, Conservation Biology, 26, 218

2012, Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: What works and what doesn’t, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28, 69, 10.1093/oxrep/grs009

2013, Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win–win solutions, Conservation Letters, 6, 274, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x

2007, A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15181, 10.1073/pnas.0702288104

2009, Restoration of ecosystem services for environmental markets, Science, 325, 575, 10.1126/science.1172976

2010, Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach, Ecological Economics, 69, 1237, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004

2010, Show me the money: Do payments supply environmental services in developing countries?, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4, 254, 10.1093/reep/req006

2010, Listening to locals on payment for environmental services, Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1139

2010, Fair and green? Social impacts of payments for environmental services in Costa Rica

2013, Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human–environment relationships, BioScience, 63, 536, 10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7

2011, REDD+ and the indigenous question: A case study from Ecuador, Forests, 2, 525, 10.3390/f2020525

2012, Reducing REDD risks: Affirmative policy on an uneven playing field, International Journal of the Commons, 6, 233, 10.18352/ijc.322

2013, Understanding and managing conservation conflicts, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28, 100, 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021

1985, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance

2012, Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future

2012, Human responses to unfairness with primary rewards and their biological limits, Scientific Reports, 2

2006, The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation, Conservation Biology, 21, 45

2013, When payments for environmental services will work for conservation, Conservation Letters, 6, 230, 10.1111/conl.12034

2008, Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries, Ecological Economics, 65, 834, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010