Social Attraction, Personal Attraction, and Self-Categorization-, A Field Study

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin - Tập 17 Số 2 - Trang 175-180 - 1991
Michael A. Hogg1, Elizabeth A. Hardie2
1University of Queensland, Australia
2University of Melbourne, Australia

Tóm tắt

A distinction based on social identity theory and self-categorization theory is made between depersonalized (i.e., group prototypical, stereotypical) social attraction and idiosyncratic personal attraction. Only the former; as the affective component of group cohesiveness, is considered to be related to group belongingness. A questionnaire administered after a training session to 28 members of an Australian football team supported the hypotheses. As predicted, group prototypicality was significantly more closely related to social attraction and to social (group-based) popularity than to personal attraction and personal (non-group-based) popularity. Furthermore, members who were morestrongly identified with the team (e.g., rated themselves as highly prototypical) employed prototypicality as a stronger basis for social attraction than other members did.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abrams, D., 1990, Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances

10.1002/ejsp.2420030103

10.1037/h0034212

Brown, R., 1965, Social psychology

10.1037/h0046022

10.1123/jsp.7.3.244

Cartwright, D., 1968, The nature of group cohesiveness

Duck, S., 1977, The study of acquaintance

10.1037/h0040958

10.2307/3707362

Fiske, S.T., The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition

Hogg, M.A. (1985). Cohesion de grupo [Group cohesiveness]. In C. Huici (Dir.), Estructura y procesos de grupo (Vol. 1, pp. 463-486). Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.

Hogg, M.A. (1987). Social identity and group cohesiveness. In J. G Turner, M. A. Hogg, P J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell, Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 89-116). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Hogg, M.A., 1990, Group solidarity: Belonging and liking in social groups—11 Unpublished research proposal to the Australian Research Council

Hogg, M.A., 1990, Intergroup relations and group cohesiveness. Unpublished research proposal to the Australian Research Council

Hogg, M.A., 1988, Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes

Hogg, M.A., 1989, Group cohesiveness, interpersonal attractian and prototypicality. Unpublished manuscript

10.1002/ejsp.2420150105

10.1111/j.2044-8309.1985.tb00690.x

10.2307/2785561

10.2307/2785559

10.1037/h0022386

10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.755

10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.001211

10.1111/j.1540-4560.1952.tb01592.x

Newcomb, T.M. (1960). Varieties of interpersonal attraction. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (2nd ed., pp. 104-119). New York: Harper & Row.

10.2307/3033635

Rubin, Z., 1979, Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology

Rüttinger, B. (1978). Friendliness and group consensus: Field study . In H. Brandstatter.J. H. Davis, & H. Schuler (Eds.), Dynamics of group decisions (pp. 149-153). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

10.1177/001872675100400303

10.2307/3033768

sherif, M., 1966, Group conflict and cooperation Their social psychology

Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Triandis, H., 1977, Interpersonal behavior

Turner, J.C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.1017/CBO9780511759154.008

Turner, 1985, Advances in group processes: Theory and reseach, 2, 77

Turner, J. C., 1981, Intergroup behaviour

Turner, J.C., 1987, Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory

10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00619.x

10.1111/j.2044-8309.1983.tb00587.x

10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002221