So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Berry, D. A. (2004). Bayesian statistics and the efficiency and ethics of clinical trials. Statistical Science, 19, 175–187.
Bloom, H. S. (2005). Randomizing Groups to Evaluate Place-Based Programs. In H. S. Bloom (Ed.), Learning more from social experiments: evolving analytic approaches. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Blundell, R., & Costa Dias, M. (2002). Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1, 91–115.
Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: a review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7–42.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates.
Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and analysis of cluster randomization in health research. London: Holder Arnold.
Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M. (2007). Using randomization in development economics research: a toolkit (CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6059). Center for Economic Policy Research, London, England.
El-Gamal, M. A., & Palfrey, T. R. (1996). Economical experiments: Bayesian efficient experimental designs. International Journal of Game Theory, 25, 495–517.
El-Gamal, M. A., McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1993). A Bayesian sequential experimental study of learning in games. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 428–435.
Fisher, R. A. (1935). The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.
Greenwald, A. G. (1976). Within-subjects design: to use or not to use. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 314–320.
Hahn, J., Hirano, K., & Karlan, D. (2011). Adaptive experimental design using the propensity score. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 29(1), 96–108.
Harrison, G., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, XLII, 1009–1055.
Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Rutström, E. E. (2009). Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 498–507.
Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–960.
Kanninen, B. J. (2002). Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 14–227.
Karlan, D., & List, J. A. (2007). Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. The American Economic Review, 97, 1774–1793.
Keren, G. (1993). Between or within-subjects design: a methodological dilemma. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: methodological issues. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates.
Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York: Wiley.
Kramer, M. S., & Shapiro, S. H. (1984). Scientific challenges in the application of randomized trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 252(19), 2739–2745.
Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. The American Statistician, 55, 187–193.
Lenth, R. V. (2006–2009). Java applets for power and sample size [Computer Software]. http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/rlenth/Power . Accessed February 2010.
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2009). Field experiments in economics: the past, the present, and the future. European Economic Review, 53(1), 1–18.
Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences tell us about the real world? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153–174.
List, J. A. (2001). Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards. The American Economic Review, 91(5), 1498–1507.
List, J. A. (2006). Field experiments: a bridge between lab and naturally occurring data. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 6(2), 8.
Liu, X., Spybrook, J., Congden, R., Martinez, A., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2009). Optimal design for longitudinal and multilevel research v.2.0 [Computer Software]. Available at: http://www.wtgrantfoundation.org/resources/overview/research_tools .
Loomes, G. (2005). Modeling the stochastic component of behaviour in experiments: some issues for the interpretation of data. Experimental Economics, 8, 301–323.
Mead, R. (1988). The design of experiments: statistical principles for practical application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McClelland, G. H. (1997). Optimal design in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 2(1), 3–19.
Raudenbush, S. W. (1997). Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 173–185.
Raudenbush, S. W., Martinez, A., & Spybrook, J. (2007). Strategies for improving precision in group-randomized experiments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(1), 5–29.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies of causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
Rubin, D.B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Annals of Statistics, 6, 34–58.
Rutström, E. E., & Wilcox, N. T. (2009). Stated beliefs versus inferred beliefs: a methodological inquiry and experimental test. Games and Economic Behavior, 67, 616–632.
Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680.
Spybrook, J., Raudenbush, S. W., Congden, R., & Martinez, A. (2009). Optimal design for longitudinal and multilevel research: documentation for the optimal design software (Working Paper). Available at: http://www.wtgrantfoundation.org/resources/overview/research_tools .
StataCorp (2007). Stata statistical software: Release 10. College Station: StataCorp LP.
Wilcox, R. R. (1996). Statistics for the social sciences. San Diego: Academic Press.
Wilcox, N. (2008). Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: a critical primer and econometric comparison. In J. C. Cox & G. W. Harrison (Eds.), Research in experimental economics: Vol. 12. Risk aversion in experiments. Bingley: Emerald.