Skin Sensitization Testing: The Ascendancy of Non-Animal Methods

Jadassohn, 1896, Zur kenntnis der Arzneiexantheme, Arch. Dermatol. Forsch., 34, 103

Draize, 1944, Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 82, 377

Johnson, 1985, The Draize test and modifications, Curr. Probl. Dermatol., 14, 31, 10.1159/000411605

Sharp, 1978, The sensitization potential of some perfume ingredients tested using a modified draize procedure, Toxicology, 9, 261, 10.1016/0300-483X(78)90009-4

Andersen, 1985, Guinea pig sensitization assays. An overview, Curr. Probl. Dermatol., 14, 263, 10.1159/000411617

Thyssen, 2012, The critical review of methodologies and approaches to assess the inherent skin sensitization potential (skin allergies) of chemicals. Part II, Contact Dermat., 66, 25, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02004_3.x

Thyssen, 2014, The multiple factors affecting the association between atopic dermatitis and contact sensitization, Allergy, 69, 28, 10.1111/all.12358

Buehler, 1965, Delayed hypersensitivity testing in guinea pigs, Arch. Dermatol., 91, 171, 10.1001/archderm.1965.01600080079017

Magnusson, 1969, The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test, J. Investig. Dermatol., 52, 268, 10.1038/jid.1969.42

Kimber, 1989, The murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: A preliminary evaluation of in situ measurement of lymphocyte proliferation, Contact Dermat., 21, 215, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb03198.x

Kimber, 1994, The local lymph node assay: Developments and applications, Toxicology, 93, 13, 10.1016/0300-483X(94)90193-7

Gerberick, 2000, Local lymph node assay: Validation assessment for regulatory purposes, Am. J. Contact Dermat., 11, 3, 10.1016/S1046-199X(00)90027-7

Dean, 2001, ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 34, 258, 10.1006/rtph.2001.1497

Kimber, 1997, Contact sensitization: A new approach to risk assessment, Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 3, 385, 10.1080/10807039709383695

Basketter, 2005, Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation, Contact Dermat., 52, 39, 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00490.x

Basketter, 2005, Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds, Contact Dermat., 53, 260, 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00707.x

Gerberick, 2001, Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach, Contact Dermat., 45, 333, 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450603.x

Basketter, 2001, Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay, Food Chem. Toxicol., 39, 621, 10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00169-1

Api, 2008, Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 52, 3, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.10.008

Api, 2020, Updating exposure assessment for skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment for fragrance materials, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 118, 104805, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104805

Shelanski, 1953, A new technique of human patch tests, Proc. Sci. Sect. Toilet Goods Assoc., 19, 46

Marzulli, 1974, The use of graded concentrations in studying skin sensitizers: Experimental contact sensitization in man, Food Cosmet. Toxicol., 12, 219, 10.1016/0015-6264(74)90367-8

Marzulli, 1976, Effects of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. I. Experimental contact sensitization in humans, Contact Dermat., 2, 325, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1976.tb03069.x

Stotts, 1980, Planning, conduct and interpretation of human predictive sensitization patch tests, Curr. Concepts Cutan. Toxic., 41, 41

McNamee, 2008, A review of critical factors in the conduct and interpretation of the human repeat insult patch test, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 52, 24, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.10.019

Kligman, 1966, The identification of contact allergens by human assay. 3. The maximization test: A procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers, J. Investig. Dermatol., 47, 393, 10.1038/jid.1966.160

Kligman, 1975, Updating the maximization test for identifying contact allergens, Contact Dermat., 1, 231, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1975.tb05389.x

SCCS (2022, March 26). Memorandum on Use of Human Data in Risk Assessment of Skin Sensitization. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_s_010.pdf.

Basketter, 2009, The human repeated insult patch test in the 21st century: A commentary, Cutan. Ocul. Toxicol, 28, 49, 10.1080/15569520902938032

OECD (2014). The Adverse Outcome Pathway for Skin Sensitisation Initiated by Covalent Binding to Proteins, OECD.

OECD (2018). Test No. 442E: In Vitro Skin Sensitisation, OECD.

OECD (2021). Guideline No. 497: Defined Approaches on Skin Sensitisation, OECD.

OECD (2018). Test No. 442D: In Vitro Skin Sensitisation, OECD.

OECD (2021). Test No. 442C: In Chemico Skin Sensitisation, OECD.

Basketter, 1996, An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers, Contact Dermat., 35, 146, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02332.x

Robinson, 1990, A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization, Toxicology, 61, 91, 10.1016/0300-483X(90)90012-6

Kligman, 1995, A critical commentary and updating of the guinea pig maximization test, Contact Dermat., 32, 129, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb00801.x

Bruze, 1987, Contact allergy to the active ingredients of Kathon CG, Contact Dermat., 16, 183, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1987.tb01421.x

Xie, 2000, Experimental study on skin sensitization potencies and cross-reactivities of hair-dye-related chemicals in guinea pigs, Contact Dermat., 42, 270, 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042005270.x

Basketter, 1988, Investigation of the prohapten concept. Cross reactions between 1,4-substituted benzene derivatives in the guinea pig, Contact Dermat., 19, 248, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb02921.x

Basketter, 2010, Skin sensitization, false positives and false negatives: Experience with guinea pig assays, J. Appl. Toxicol., 30, 381, 10.1002/jat.1545

Basketter, 2007, The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: Status of validation, Contact Dermat., 57, 70, 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01141.x

Api, 2008, The Use of Human Data When Conducting Dermal Sensitization Quantitative Risk Assessments for Fragrance Ingredients, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 50, 163

Basketter, 2016, Skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment: A review of underlying assumptions, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 74, 105, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.11.013

EU (2016). Commission regulation (EU) 2016/1688 of 20 September 2016 amending Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the council on the Registration. Off. J. Eur. Communities, 255, 1–3.

Sauer, 2016, Local tolerance testing under REACH: Accepted non-animal methods are not on equal footing with animal tests, Altern. Lab. Anim., 44, 281, 10.1177/026119291604400311

Ezendam, 2016, State of the art in non-animal approaches for skin sensitization testing: From individual test methods towards testing strategies, Arch. Toxicol., 90, 2861, 10.1007/s00204-016-1842-4

Reisinger, 2015, Systematic evaluation of non-animal test methods for skin sensitisation safety assessment, Toxicol. Vitro, 29, 259, 10.1016/j.tiv.2014.10.018

Desprez, 2018, A strategy for systemic toxicity assessment based on non-animal approaches: The Cosmetics Europe Long Range Science Strategy programme, Toxicol. Vitro, 50, 137, 10.1016/j.tiv.2018.02.017

Bernauer, 2021, The SCCS Notes of Guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation, 11th revision, 30–31 March 2021, SCCS/1628/21, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 127, 105052, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105052

Parish, 2020, An evaluation framework for new approach methodologies (NAMs) for human health safety assessment, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 112, 104592, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104592

Strickland, 2019, Skin sensitization testing needs and data uses by US regulatory and research agencies, Arch. Toxicol., 93, 273, 10.1007/s00204-018-2341-6

Dent, 2018, Principles underpinning the use of new methodologies in the risk assessment of cosmetic ingredients, Comput. Toxicol., 7, 20, 10.1016/j.comtox.2018.06.001

Gilmour, 2020, Development of a next generation risk assessment framework for the evaluation of skin sensitisation of cosmetic ingredients, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 116, 104721, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104721

Kleinstreuer, 2018, Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): An assessment of defined approaches, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 48, 359, 10.1080/10408444.2018.1429386

Na, 2022, Benchmarking performance of SENS-IS assay against weight of evidence skin sensitization potency categories, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 130, 105128, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105128

Macmillan, 2019, A defined approach for predicting skin sensitisation hazard and potency based on the guided integration of in silico, in chemico and in vitro data using exclusion criteria, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 101, 35, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.11.001

Patlewicz, 2007, TIMES-SS--a promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 48, 225, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.03.003

Patlewicz, 2014, TIMES-SS--recent refinements resulting from an industrial skin sensitisation consortium, SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 25, 367, 10.1080/1062936X.2014.900520

Patlewicz, 2019, Exploring current read-across applications and needs among selected U.S. Federal Agencies, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 106, 197, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.05.011

Chilton, 2018, Making reliable negative predictions of human skin sensitisation using an in silico fragmentation approach, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 95, 227, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.015

Enoch, 2008, Identification of mechanisms of toxic action for skin sensitisation using a SMARTS pattern based approach, SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 19, 555, 10.1080/10629360802348985

Cottrez, 2016, SENS-IS, a 3D reconstituted epidermis based model for quantifying chemical sensitization potency: Reproducibility and predictivity results from an inter-laboratory study, Toxicol. Vitro, 32, 248, 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.01.007

Cottrez, 2015, Genes specifically modulated in sensitized skins allow the detection of sensitizers in a reconstructed human skin model. Development of the SENS-IS assay, Toxicol. Vitro, 29, 787, 10.1016/j.tiv.2015.02.012

Zeller, 2017, The GARD platform for potency assessment of skin sensitizing chemicals, ALTEX, 34, 539, 10.14573/altex.1701101

Masinja, 2021, Comparison of the predictive nature of the Genomic Allergen Rapid Detection (GARD) assay with mammalian assays in determining the skin sensitisation potential of agrochemical active ingredients, Toxicol. Vitro, 70, 105017, 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.105017

Wareing, 2017, Prediction of skin sensitization potency sub-categories using peptide reactivity data, Toxicol. Vitro, 45, 134, 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.08.015

Jaworska, 2015, Bayesian integrated testing strategy (ITS) for skin sensitization potency assessment: A decision support system for quantitative weight of evidence and adaptive testing strategy, Arch. Toxicol., 89, 2355, 10.1007/s00204-015-1634-2

Natsch, 2015, Predicting Skin Sensitizer Potency Based on In Vitro Data from KeratinoSens and Kinetic Peptide Binding: Global Versus Domain-Based Assessment, Toxicol. Sci., 143, 319, 10.1093/toxsci/kfu229

Hirota, 2015, Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization, J. Appl. Toxicol., 35, 1333, 10.1002/jat.3105

Hirota, 2018, Development of an artificial neural network model for risk assessment of skin sensitization using human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay, KeratinoSens and in silico structure alert parameter, J. Appl. Toxicol., 38, 514, 10.1002/jat.3558

Takenouchi, 2015, Test battery with the human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay and DEREK based on a 139 chemical data set for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals, J. Appl. Toxicol., 35, 1318, 10.1002/jat.3127

OECD (2021). Guideline No. 497: Defined Approaches on Skin Sensitisation. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD Publishing.

Bauch, 2012, Putting the parts together: Combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 63, 489, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.013

Urbisch, 2015, Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 71, 337, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.12.008

Natsch, 2021, A triangular approach for the validation of new approach methods for skin sensitization, ALTEX, 38, 669

OECD (2021). Test Guideline No. 442C: In Chemico Skin Sensitisation Assays addressing the Adverse Outcome Pathway, key event on covalent binding to proteins. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD.

Natsch, 2020, Predictivity of the kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA) for sensitizer potency assessment and GHS subclassification, ALTEX, 37, 652

Wareing, 2020, The kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA): Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility in a seven-laboratory ring trial, ALTEX, 37, 639

Natsch, 2018, Deriving a No Expected Sensitization Induction Level for Fragrance Ingredients Without Animal Testing: An Integrated Approach Applied to Specific Case Studies, Toxicol. Sci., 165, 170, 10.1093/toxsci/kfy135

OECD (2021). Series on Testing and Assessment No. 336: Supporting Document to the Guideline (GL) on Defined Approaches (DAs) for Skin Sensitisation-Annex 2, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/series-testing-assessment-publications-number.htm.

Zang, 2017, Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches, J. Appl. Toxicol., 37, 792, 10.1002/jat.3424

Loveless, 2010, Potency values from the local lymph node assay: Application to classification, labelling and risk assessment, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 56, 54, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.08.016

OECD (2010). Test No. 429: Skin Sensitisation, OECD.

Reynolds, 2021, A hypothetical skin sensitisation next generation risk assessment for coumarin in cosmetic products, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 127, 105075, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105075

Reynolds, 2019, Probabilistic prediction of human skin sensitiser potency for use in next generation risk assessment, Comput. Toxicol., 9, 36, 10.1016/j.comtox.2018.10.004

Basketter, 2014, Consideration of criteria required for assignment of a (skin) sensitiser a substance of very high concern (SVHC) under the REACH regulation, Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 69, 524, 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.05.022

Api, 2017, Fragrances Categorized According to Relative Human Skin Sensitization Potency, Dermatitis, 28, 299, 10.1097/DER.0000000000000304

Na, 2022, Weight of Evidence Approach for Skin Sensitization Potency Categorization of Fragrance Ingredients, Dermatitis, 33, 161, 10.1097/DER.0000000000000854

Casati, 2009, Selection of chemicals for the development and evaluation of in vitro methods for skin sensitisation testing, Altern. Lab. Anim., 37, 305, 10.1177/026119290903700313

Hoffmann, 2018, Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (I): The Cosmetics Europe database, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 48, 344, 10.1080/10408444.2018.1429385

Kolle, 2019, Regarding the references for reference chemicals of alternative methods, Toxicol. Vitro, 57, 48, 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.02.007

Natsch, 2013, A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation, J. Appl. Toxicol, 33, 1337, 10.1002/jat.2868