Skin Recovery After Discontinuation of Long-Term Moisturizer Application: A Split-Face Comparison Pilot Study

Dermatology and Therapy - Tập 10 - Trang 1371-1382 - 2020
Julia-Tatjana Maul1, Lara Valeska Maul2, Marc Kägi3,4, Phil Cheng1, Florian Anzengruber1, Mathilde von Laue3, Yuki Chen5, Martin Kägi3,4, Alexander Navarini2
1Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
2Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
3Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
4Hautzentrum, Zürich AG, Zurich, Switzerland
5Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Facial moisturizers are commonly used by healthy women and increasingly men of all age groups. This study aimed to investigate the effects of moisturizer discontinuation and the subsequent evolution of symptoms. Two prospective observational split-face comparison pilot studies were performed in Switzerland and enrolled (I) 20 healthy women aged 17–25 years in winter and (II) 36 female subjects 15–20 and 40–55 years of age in summer. Moisturizers were stopped on the investigational half of the face. On the control side, the usual skin care regimen was continued. Daily subjective (I/II) and objective (I) skin assessments for the occurrence of typical symptoms of dry skin (dryness, itching, scales, redness, wrinkles) were collected. In the winter study (cohort I) in both the subjective and objective assessment, all skin changes increased significantly within 1 day after discontinuation. On day 7, dryness (p < 0.001), itching (p < 0.025), redness (p < 0.001) and scales (p < 0.049) were significantly different in the subjective assessment and redness (p < 0.004) and scales (p < 0.001) in the objective assessment. Skin dryness reverted to baseline levels after 6 days in the objective assessment and 10 days in the subjective assessment. The control side’s condition was reached after 6 days. In the summer study (II), only among the 15–20-year-olds was dryness significantly higher on the intervention side from day 1 (p < 0.028) to day 14 (p < 0.009). Their recovery time was 11 days until dryness intensity scores comparable to baseline were reached, and 21 days until the control side’s values were matched. Over a 7-day period, the overall mean dryness score was significantly different between the interventional and control sides for both young and old participants. Both healthy young and aging female subjects react with typical symptoms of temporary dryness to a sudden stop of a previous long-term moisturizer treatment but regain normal levels quickly without continuation of moisturizers. The skin recovery time for skin dehydration is 1–3 weeks in young female subjects with varying intensities depending on the season.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Pons-Guiraud A. Dry skin in dermatology: a complex physiopathology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21(Suppl 2):1–4. Mayo Clinic. Dry skin. Mayo Clinic. 2019. www.mayoclinic.com/health/dry-skin/DS00560. Accessed 4 Aug 2020. Alexander H, Brown S, Danby S, Flohr C. Research techniques made simple: transepidermal water loss measurement as a research tool. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138(11):2295–2300 e1. Jiang ZX, DeLaCruz J. Appearance benefits of skin moisturization. Skin Res Technol. 2011;17(1):51–5. Loden M. Barrier recovery and influence of irritant stimuli in skin treated with a moisturizing cream. Contact Dermat. 1997;36(5):256–60. Held E, Lund H, Agner T. Effect of different moisturizers on SLS-irritated human skin. Contact Dermat. 2001;44(4):229–34. Buraczewska I, Berne B, Lindberg M, Törmä H, Lodén M. Changes in skin barrier function following long-term treatment with moisturizers, a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(3):492–8. Serup J. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: clinical scoring systems. Skin Res Technol. 1995;1(3):109–14. MeteoSchweiz. Klimabulletin Winter 2016/2017. MeteoSchweiz. 2017. https://www.meteoschweiz.admin.ch/content/dam/meteoswiss/de/Ungebundene-Seiten/Publikationen/Klimabulletin/doc/klimabulletin_winter_2016-2017-korr.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2020. MeteoSchweiz. Klimabulletin Sommer 2017. MeteoSchweiz. 2017. https://www.meteoschweiz.admin.ch/content/dam/meteoswiss/de/service-und-publikationen/Publikationen/doc/klimabulletin_sommer_d-2017.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2020. Rawlings AV, Canestrari DA, Dobkowski B. Moisturizer technology versus clinical performance. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(Suppl 1):49–56. Draelos ZD. Modern moisturizer myths, misconceptions, and truths. Cutis. 2013;91(6):308–14. Levin J, Momin SB. How much do we really know about our favorite cosmeceutical ingredients? J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3(2):22–41. Held E, Agner T. Effect of moisturizers on skin susceptibility to irritants. Acta Derm Venereol. 2001;81(2):104–7. Fu JJ, Hillebrand GG, Raleigh P, et al. A randomized, controlled comparative study of the wrinkle reduction benefits of a cosmetic niacinamide/peptide/retinyl propionate product regimen vs a prescription 0.02% tretinoin product regimen. Br J Dermatol. 2010;162(3):647–54. Crowther JM, Sieg A, Blenkiron P, et al. Measuring the effects of topical moisturizers on changes in stratum corneum thickness, water gradients and hydration in vivo. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(3):567–77. Heinrich U, Koop U, Leneveu-Duchemin M-C, et al. Multicentre comparison of skin hydration in terms of physical-, physiological- and product-dependent parameters by the capacitive method (Corneometer CM 825). Int J Cosmet Sci. 2003;25(1–2):45–53. Draelos ZD, Matsubara A, Smiles K. The effect of 2% niacinamide on facial sebum production. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2006;8(2):96–101. Lee C, Bajor J, Moaddel T, et al. Principles of moisturizer product design. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(1s):s89–95. Guenther L, Lynde CW, Andriessen A, et al. Pathway to dry skin prevention and treatment. J Cutan Med Surg. 2012;16(1):23–31. Rogers J, Harding C, Mayo A, Banks J, Rawlings A. Stratum corneum lipids: the effect of ageing and the seasons. Arch Dermatol Res. 1996;288(12):765–70. Hellemans L, Corstjens H, Neven A, Declercq L, Maes D. Antioxidant enzyme activity in human stratum corneum shows seasonal variation with an age-dependent recovery. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120(3):434–9. Wei KS, Stella C, Wehmeyer KR, et al. Effects of season stratum corneum barrier function and skin biomarkers. J Cosmet Sci. 2016;67(3):185–203. Liu X, German GK. The effects of barrier disruption and moisturization on the dynamic drying mechanics of human stratum corneum. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;49:80–9. White-Chu EF, Reddy M. Dry skin in the elderly: complexities of a common problem. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29(1):37–42. Trayssac M, Hannun YA, Obeid LM. Role of sphingolipids in senescence: implication in aging and age-related diseases. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(7):2702–12. Forte AJ, Andrew TW, Colasante C, Persing JA. Perception of age, attractiveness, and tiredness after isolated and combined facial subunit aging. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39(6):856–69. Pinsky MA. Efficacy and safety of an anti-aging technology for the treatment of facial wrinkles and skin moisturization. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017;10(12):27–35. Spada F, Lui AH, Barnes TM. Use of formulations for sensitive skin improves the visible signs of aging, including wrinkle size and elasticity. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019;12:415–25. Mukta S, Adam F. Cosmeceuticals in day-to-day clinical practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2010;9(5 Suppl ODAC Conf Pt 1):s62–s6666.