Skeletal stability after maxillary distraction osteogenesis or conventional Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate: A superimposition-based cephalometric analysis
Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Trang 1-10 - 2024
Tóm tắt
The aim was to assess skeletal stability after maxillary advancement using either distraction osteogenesis (DO) or conventional Le Fort I osteotomy (CO) in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) or cleft palate (CP) utilising a new superimposition-based cephalometric method. This retrospective study included patients who were treated with DO (N = 12) or CO (N = 9). Sagittal and vertical changes after surgery, and skeletal stability at 18 months post-operatively were assessed with superimposition-based cephalometry, comparing lateral cephalograms performed pre-operatively (T0), post-operatively after CO or immediately after completed distraction in DO (T1), and at 18 months of follow-up (T2). The mean sagittal movements from T0 to T2 in the DO and CO groups were 5.9 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively, with a skeletal relapse rate of 16% in the DO group and 15% in the CO group between T1 and T2. The vertical mean movement from T0 to T2 in the DO and CO groups was 2.8 mm and 2.0 mm, respectively, and the skeletal relapse rate between T1 and T2 was 36% in the DO group and 32% in the CO group. Sagittal advancement of the maxilla was stable, in contrast to the vertical downward movement, which showed more-extensive relapse in both groups. Despite more-extensive maxillary advancement in the DO group, the rates of skeletal relapse were similar.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG et al (2009) Cleft lip and palate. Lancet (London, England) 374:1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4
Molina-Solana R, Yanez-Vico RM, Iglesias-Linares A et al (2013) Current concepts on the effect of environmental factors on cleft lip and palate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.10.008
Kloukos D, Fudalej P, Sequeira-Byron P, Katsaros C (2018) Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(8):CD010403. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010403.pub3
Friede H, Katsaros C (1998) Current knowledge in cleft lip and palate treatment from an orthodontist’s point of view. J Orofac Orthop = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie Organ/official J Dtsch Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie 59:313–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01299768
DeLuke DM, Marchand A, Robles EC, Fox P (1997) Facial growth and the need for orthognathic surgery after cleft palate repair: literature review and report of 28 cases. J oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:694–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(97)90579-6
Ross RB (1987) Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 24:5–77
Cohen SR, Corrigan M, Wilmot J, Trotman CA (1995) Cumulative operative procedures in patients aged 14 years and older with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:267–271. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199508000-00003
Rosenstein S, Kernahan D, Dado D et al (1991) Orthognathic surgery in cleft patients treated by early bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:832–835. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199105000-00003
Bailey L’JT, Cevidanes LHS, Proffit WR (2004) Stability and predictability of orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod 126:273–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889540604005207
Hirano A, Suzuki H (2001) Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft palate-craniofacial J Off Publ Am Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Assoc 38:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0001_frtral_2.0.co_2
Fahradyan A, Wolfswinkel EM, Clarke N et al (2018) Impact of the Distance of Maxillary Advancement on Horizontal Relapse After Orthognathic Surgery. Cleft palate-craniofacial J Off Publ Am Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Assoc 55:546–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665617739731
Hochban W, Ganss C, Austermann KH (1993) Long-term results after maxillary advancement in patients with clefts. Cleft palate-craniofacial J Off Publ Am Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Assoc 30:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0237_ltrama_2.3.co_2
Roy A-A, Rtshiladze MA, Stevens K, Phillips J (2019) Orthognathic Surgery for Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate. Clin Plast Surg 46:157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2018.11.002
Chua HDP, Hägg MB, Cheung LK (2010) Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery–which one is more stable in 5 years? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:803–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.056
Cheung LK, Chua HDP, Hägg MB (2006) Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery: clinical morbidities and surgical relapse. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:996–1008. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000232358.31321.ea
Andersen K, Svenstrup M, Pedersen TK et al (2015) Stability after Cleft Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis or Conventional Orthognathic Surgery. J oral Maxillofac Res 6:e2. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2015.6202
Kumar A, Gabbay JS, Nikjoo R et al (2006) Improved outcomes in cleft patients with severe maxillary deficiency after Le Fort I internal distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1499–1509. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000206308.86089.86
Jiang L, Zheng Y, Li N et al (2020) Relapse rate after surgical treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in non-growing cleft patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:421–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.08.012
Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Friede H, Ko EW (2004) Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1382–1384. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000138593.89303.1b
Al-Taai N, Levring Jäghagen E, Persson M et al (2021) A superimposition-based cephalometric method to quantitate craniofacial changes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(10):5260. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105260
Ghafari J, Baumrind S, Efstratiadis SS (1998) Misinterpreting growth and treatment outcome from serial cephalographs. Clin Orthod Res 1:102–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.1998.1.2.102
Ghafari J, Efstratiadis SS (1989) Mandibular displacement and dentitional changes during orthodontic treatment and growth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod 95:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90130-3
Cheung LK, Chua HDP (2006) A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.06.008
Valls-Ontañón A, Fernandes-Ciaccia L, Haas-Junior OL, Hernández-Alfaro F (2021) Relapse-related factors of Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J cranio-maxillo-facial Surg Off Publ Eur Assoc Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg 49:879–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2021.09.002
Daimaruya T, Imai Y, Kochi S et al (2010) Midfacial changes through distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction system with retention plates in cleft lip and palate patients. J oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1480–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.076
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Afrand M, Ling CP, Khosrotehrani S et al (2014) Anterior cranial-base time-related changes: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod 146:21-32.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.019
Björk A, Skieller V (1983) Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 5:1–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/5.1.1
Li C, Teixeira H, Tanna N et al (2021) The reliability of two- and three-dimensional cephalometric measurements: a CBCT study. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 11(12):2292. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122292
Signorelli L, Patcas R, Peltomäki T, Schätzle M (2016) Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop=Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie Organ/official J Dtsch Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie 77:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-015-0002-4
Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D et al (2008) Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod its Const Soc Am Board Orthod 134:798–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.008
Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L (2007) Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36:263–269. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/98032356
Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A (2008) In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 78:873–879. https://doi.org/10.2319/082907-399.1
Qian Y, Qiao H, Wang X et al (2022) Comparison of the accuracy of 2D and 3D cephalometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Australas Orthod J 38:130–144. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2022-0015
Benn DK, Vig PS (2021) Estimation of x-ray radiation related cancers in US dental offices: Is it worth the risk? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 132:597–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2021.01.027
Watts GD, Antonarakis GS, Forrest CR et al (2015) Is Linear Advancement Related to Relapse in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Orthognathic Surgery? Cleft palate-craniofacial J Off Publ Am Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Assoc 52:717–723. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-061.1
Jang H, Park J-Y, Choi N-R, Hwang D-S (2022) Skeletal Stability of Two-Jaw Surgery Without Bone Grafting in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate. J Craniofac Surg 33:e150–e153. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008166
Velasques BD, Moura LB, Martins JR et al (2021) What is the relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients? A systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 25:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00906-y
Saltaji H, Major MP, Alfakir H et al (2012) Maxillary advancement with conventional orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: is it a stable technique? J oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:2859–2866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.009
Ganoo T, Sjöström M (2019) Outcomes of Maxillary Orthognathic Surgery in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: A Literature Review. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 18:500–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-019-01217-w
Chua HDP, Ho SMY, Cheung LK (2012) The comparison of psychological adjustment of patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114:S5-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.07.047