Size-corrected inference in fiscal policy reaction functions: a three country assessment
Tóm tắt
As a reflection of both strong persistence of debt-to-GDP ratios and correlation of respective innovations with governments’ primary surpluses, standard t-tests in policy reaction functions show actual significance levels that are up to five times larger than their nominal reference. Adopting size-controlled inference by means of Monte Carlo-based and asymptotic Bonferroni critical values, we diagnose fiscal policies in the US and the UK to be sustainable in samples covering more than 100 years. Conditioning on post-WWII subsamples and 5% nominal significance, conventional t-tests signal fiscal sustainability for these countries. In contrast, size-corrected inference hints at a lack of fiscal sustainability and, thus is recommended for the ‘real-time’ monitoring of public debt. The fiscal policy of Portugal is found to lack sustainability irrespective of the considered sample period.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abeysinghe T, Jayawickrama A (2013) A segmented trend model to assess fiscal sustainability: the US experience 1929–2009. Empir Econ 44(3):1129–1141
Afonso A (2005) Fiscal sustainability: the unpleasant European case. FinanzArchiv Public Financ Anal 61(1):19–44
Afonso A, Jalles JT (2015) Fiscal sustainability: a panel assessment for advanced economies. Appl Econ Lett 22(11):925–929
Afonso A, Rault C (2015) Multi-step analysis of public finances sustainability. Econ Model 48(C):199–209
Ahmed S, Rogers JH (1995) Government budget deficits and trade deficits are present value constraints satisfied in long-term data? J Monet Econ 36(2):351–374
Antonini M, Lee K, Pires J (2013) Public sector debt dynamics: the persistence and sources of shocks to debt in 10 EU countries. J Money Credit Bank 45(2–3):277–298
Barro RJ (1979) On the determination of the public debt. J Polit Econ 87(5):940–71
Bohn H (1995) The sustainability of budget deficits in a stochastic economy. J Money Credit Bank 27(1):257–271
Bohn H (1998) The behavior of U.S. public debt and deficits. Q J Econ 113(3):949–963
Bohn H (2007) Are stationarity and cointegration restrictions really necessary for the intertemporal budget constraint? J Monet Econ 54(7):1837–1847
Bohn H (2008) The sustainability of fiscal policy in the United States. In: Neck R, Sturm J-E (eds) Sustainability of public debt, chapter 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 15–49
Campbell JY, Yogo M (2005) Implementing the econometric methods in ‘Efficient tests of stock return predictability’. Technical appendix, University of Pennsylvania
Campbell JY, Yogo M (2006) Efficient tests of stock return predictability. J Financ Econ 81(1):27–60
Corsetti G, Meier A, Müller GJ (2012) What determines government spending multipliers? Econ Policy 27(72):521–565
Elliott G, Stock JH (1994) Inference in time series regression when the order of integration of a regressor is unknown. Econ Theory 10(3–4):672–700
Elliott G, Rothenberg TJ, Stock JH (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64(4):813–836
Evans M, Fuertes A (2010) Understanding the dynamics of the US external position. Working papers gueconwpa 10-10-05, Georgetown University, Department of Economics
Fisher R (1934) Statistical methods for research workers, 5th edn. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh
Ghosh AR, Kim JI, Mendoza EG, Ostry JD, Qureshi MS (2013) Fiscal fatigue, fiscal space and debt sustainability in advanced economies. Econ J 123(566):F4–F30
Greiner A, Semmler W (1999) An inquiry into the sustainability of German fiscal policy: some time-series tests. Public Financ Rev 27(2):220–236
Greiner A, Koeller U, Semmler W (2006) Testing the sustainability of German fiscal policy: evidence for the period 1960–2003. Empirica 33(2):127–140
Greiner A, Köller U, Semmler W (2007) Debt sustainability in the European Monetary Union: theory and empirical evidence for selected countries. Oxf Econ Pap 59(2):194–218
Hakkio CS, Rush M (1991) Is the budget deficit “too large?”. Econ Inq 29(3):429–445
Hamdi H, Sbia R (2013) Fiscal policy and economic growth in PIIGS countries: an empirical assessment. J Appl Bus Res 29(5):1343–1352
Hamilton JD, Flavin MA (1986) On the limitations of government borrowing: a framework for empirical testing. Am Econ Rev 76(4):808–819
IMF and WB (2001) Guidelines for public debt management. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, online publication. https://www.imf.org/external/np/mae/pdebt/2000/eng/Index.htm
Kempa B, Khan NS (2015) On the size of government spending multipliers in Europe. Appl Econ 47(51):5548–5558
Kempa B, Khan NS (2016) Government debt and economic growth in the G7 countries: are there any causal linkages? Appl Econ Lett 23(6):440–443
Kim C-J, Park C (2013) Disappearing dividends: implications for the dividend-price ratio and return predictability. J Money Credit Bank 45:933–952
Koijen RS, Nieuwerburgh SV (2011) Predictability of returns and cash flows. Annu Rev Financ Econ 3(1):467–491
Kremers JJM (1988) Long-run limits on the US federal debt. Econ Lett 28(3):259–262
Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? J Econ 54(1–3):159–178
Lettau M, Van Nieuwerburgh SG (2008) Reconciling the return predictability evidence. Rev Financ Stud 21:1607–1652
Lukkezen J, Rojas-Romagosa H (2012) When is debt sustainable? CPB Discussion Paper 212, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis
MacDonald R, Speight AEH (1990) The intertemporal government budget constraint in the U.K., 1961–1986. Manch Sch 58(4):329–347
Mankiw GN, Shapiro MD (1985) Trends, random walks, and tests of the permanent income hypothesis. J Monet Econ 16(2):165–174
Mankiw GN, Shapiro MD (1986) Do we reject too often? Small sample properties of tests of rational expectations models. Econ Lett 20(2):139–145
Marinheiro C (2006) The sustainability of Portuguese fiscal policy from a historical perspective. Empirica 33(2):155–179
Mark NC (1995) Exchange rates and fundamentals: evidence on long-horizon predictability. Am Econ Rev 85(1):201–218
Mendoza EG, Ostry JD (2008) International evidence on fiscal solvency: is fiscal policy “responsible”? J Monet Econ 55(6):1081–1093
Mitchell BR (1988) British historical statistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55(3):703–708
Newey WK, West KD (1994) Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Rev Econ Stud 61(4):631–653
Perotti R (1999) Fiscal policy in good times and bad. Q J Econ 114(4):1399–1436
Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346
Plödt M, Reicher CA (2015) Estimating fiscal policy reaction functions: the role of model specification. J Macroecon 46(C):113–128
Quintos CE (1995) Sustainability of the deficit process with structural shifts. J Bus Econ Stat 13(4):409–417
Stambaugh RF (1999) Predictive regressions. J Financ Econ 54(3):375–421
Trehan B, Walsh CE (1988) Common trends, the government’s budget constraint, and revenue smoothing. J Econ Dyn Control 12:425–444
Welch I, Goyal A (2008) A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction. Rev Financ Stud 21(4):1455–1508
Wilcox DW (1989) The sustainability of government deficits: implications of the present-value borrowing constraint. J Money Credit Bank 21(3):291–306
Woodford M (1998) Comment on Cochrane’s ‘A frictionless view of U.S. inflation’. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 390–418