Situated agency: towards an affordance-based, sensorimotor theory of action

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 17 - Trang 761-785 - 2017
Martin Weichold1
1University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

Tóm tắt

Recent empirical findings from social psychology, ecological psychology, and embodied cognitive science indicate that situational factors crucially shape the course of human behavior. For instance, it has been shown that finding a dime, being under the influence of an authority figure, or just being presented with food in easy reach often influences behavior tremendously. These findings raise important new questions for the philosophy of action: Are these findings a threat to classical conceptions of human agency? Are humans passively pushed around by situational factors, or are there agential aspects in the way we spontaneously experience and react to situations? How can one conceptualize the pervasive influence of situational factors on human action? What are situations in the first place, and how should the influence of these situations on action be thought of? This paper sets out to develop a new conceptual repertoire for thinking about the influence of situations on action, drawing on research from ecological psychology as well as from embodied and enactive cognitive science. The key proposal is the development of a philosophical sensorimotor account of agency: Action, it is proposed, should be conceived of as constant dynamical interaction of agential and environmental factors – factors which should all be conceptualized in new ways.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1963). Intention (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Aristotle (1999). Nicomachean ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co. Arpaly, N. (2003). Unprincipled virtue: An inquiry into moral agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479. Bittner, R. (2001). Doing things for reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brownstein, M., & Madva, A. (2012). Ethical automaticity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 42(1), 68–98. Bruineberg, J., & Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 1–18. Burge, T. (2009). Primitive agency and natural norms. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 79(2), 251–278. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press. Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1485), 1585–1599. Ciurria, M. (2013). Situationism, moral responsibility and blame. Philosophia, 41(1), 179–193. Cohen, L. J. (1989). Belief and acceptance. Mind, 98(391), 367–389. Colombetti, G. (2014). The feeling body: Affective science meets the enactive mind. Cambridge: MIT Press. Costall, A., & Morris, P. (2015). The “textbook Gibson”: The assimilation of dissidence. History of Psychology, 18(1), 1–14. Dancy, J. (2000). Practical reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dancy, J. (2004). Ethics without principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). " From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100–108. Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons, and causes. The Journal of Philosophy, 60(23), 685–700. Davidson, D. (1982). Rational animals. Dialectica, 36(4), 317–327. Deigh, J. (1994). Cognitivism in the theory of emotions. Ethics, 104, 824–854. Di Nucci, E. (2013). Mindlessness. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridege, U.K, New York: Cambridge University press. Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger's being and time, division I. Cambridge: MIT Press. Dreyfus, H. L. (2005). Overcoming the myth of the mental: How philosophers can profit from the phenomenology of everyday expertise. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 79(2), 47–65. Dreyfus, H. L. (2007). The return of the myth of the mental. Inquiry, 50(4), 352–365. Dreyfus, H. L. (2013). The myth of the pervasiveness of the mental. In J. K. Schear (Ed.), Mind, reason, and being-in-the-world: The McDowell-Dreyfus debate (pp. 15–40). New York: Routledge. Frankfurt, H. G. (1978). The problem of action. American Philosophical Quarterly, pp., 157–162. Gendler, T. S. (2008a). Alief in action (and reaction). Mind & Language, 23(5), 552–585. Gendler, T. S. (2008b). Alief and belief. The Journal of Philosophy, 105(10), 634–663. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Harman, G. (1999). Moral philosophy meets social psychology: Virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 99, 315–331. Hassin, R. R., Uleman, J. S., & Bargh, J. A. (Eds.). (2007). The new unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Haugeland, J. (1998). Mind embodied and embedded. In J. Haugeland, Having thought: Essays in the metaphysics of mind (pp. 207-238). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger barker, and the legacy of William James's radical empiricism. Mahwah: L. Erlbaum. Heidegger, Martin (1927/1968), Being and time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, Harper Perennial, New York. Hommel, B., Prinz, W., Beisert, M., & Herwig, A. (2013). Ideomotor action control: On the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline, 113–136. Husserl, Edmund (1989), Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Book 2. Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge: MIT Press. Isen, A. M., & Levin, P. F. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(3), 384–388. Kamtekar, R. (2004). Situationism and virtue ethics on the content of our character. Ethics, 114(3), 458–491. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. Trench, Truber, London: Kegan Paul. Korsgaard, C. M. (2009). Self-constitution: Agency, identity, and integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company. van Ludger, D., Withagen, R., & Bongers, R. M. (2015). Information without content: A Gibsonian reply to enactivists’ worries. Cognition, 134, 210–214. Mackie, J. L. (1977). Inventing right and wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin. McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. McDowell, J. (2007). What myth? Inquiry, 50(4), 338–351. McDowell, J. (2013). The myth of the mind as detached. In J. K. Schear (Ed.), Mind, reason, and being-in-the-world: The McDowell-Dreyfus debate (pp. 41–56). New York: Routledge. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Mele, A. R., & Shepherd, J. (2013). Situationism and agency. Journal of Practical Ethics, 1(1), 62–83. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1965), The structure of behavior. Translated by Alden L. Fisher, Duguesne University Press, Pittsburgh. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, London: Translated by Donald Landes. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Enfield: Perennial. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1886/2003), Beyond Good and Evil, Penguin, London. Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge: MIT Press. Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Olin, L., & Doris, J. M. (2014). Vicious minds. Philosophical Studies, 168(3), 665–692. O'Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(05), 939–973. Pacherie, E. (2011). Self-agency. In S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the self (pp. 442–464). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Prinz, J. (2009). The normativity challenge: Cultural psychology provides the real threat to virtue ethics. The Journal of Ethics, 13(2–3), 117–144. Reader, S. (2007). The other side of agency. Philosophy, 82(04), 579–604. Reader, Soran (2010), “Agency, Patiency, and personhood”, in O’Connor, T. and Sandis, C. (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of action, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 200–208. Richard Ridderinkhof, K., Forstmann, B. U., Wylie, S. A., Burle, B., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2011). Neurocognitive mechanisms of action control: Resisting the call of the sirens. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(2), 174–192. Rietveld, E. (2008). Situated normativity: The normative aspect of embodied cognition in unreflective action. Mind, 117(468), 973–1001. Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352. Romdenh-Romluc, K. (2013). Habit and attention. In R. T. Jensen & D. Moran (Eds.), The phenomenology of embodied subjectivity (pp. 3–19). Cham: Springer. Ross, Lee and Nisbett, Richard E. (1991/2011), The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology, Pinter & Martin, London. Sabini, J., & Silver, M. (2005). Lack of character? Situationism critiqued. Ethics, 115(3), 535–562. Schiller, Friedrich (1793/1971), Kallias. Oder Über die Schönheit. Über Anmut und Würde, Reclam, Stuttgart. Sie, M., & Wouters, A. (2010). The BCN challenge to compatibilist free will and personal responsibility. Neuroethics, 3(2), 121–133. Sneddon, A. (2008). The depths and shallows of psychological externalism. Philosophical Studies, 138, 393–408. Sneddon, A. (2011). Like minded: Externalism and moral psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press. Solomon, R. (1980). Emotions and choice. In A. Rorty (Ed.), Explaining emotions (pp. 251–281). Los Angeles: University of California Press. Sreenivasan, G. (2002). Errors about errors: Virtue theory and trait attribution. Mind, 111(441), 47–68. Sreenivasan, G. (2008). Character and consistency: Still more errors. Mind, 117(467), 603–612. Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., Paolo, D., & Ezequiel, A. (Eds.). (2013). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT press. Stocker, Michael, with Elizabeth Hegeman (1992), Valuing emotions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Belknap: Cambridge, Mass. Thompson, E. (2014). Waking, dreaming, being: Self and consciousness in neuroscience, meditation, and philosophy. Vancouver: Columbia University Press. Turvey, M. T., & Shaw, R. E. (1979). The primacy of perceiving: An ecological reformulation of perception for understanding memory. Perspectives on memory research, pp., 167–222. Varela, F. J. (1988). Structural coupling and the origin of meaning in a simple cellular automation. In E. E. Sercarz (Ed.), The semiotics of cellular communication in the immune system, springer (pp. 151–161). Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. T., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. The MIT: Press. Vargas, M. (2013). Situationism and moral responsibility. Free will in fragments. In A. Clark, J. Kiverstein, & T. Vierkant (Eds.), Decomposing the will (pp. 325–350). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge: MIT Press. Weichold, M. (2016). Mastering sociocultural contingencies: On extending the sensorimotor theory to the domain of culture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(5–6), 203–227. Weichold, M. (2017). Enacting the moral self: Combining enactivist cognitive science with Mead’s pragmatism. Pragmatism Today, 8(1), 146–172. Wheeler, M. (2005). Reconstructing the cognitive world: The next step. Cambridge: MIT Press. Willams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Oxon: Routledge. Withagen, R., de Poel, H. J., Araújo, D., & Pepping, G.-J. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 250–258. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953/2009), Philosophical investigations. Philosophische Untersuchungen, 4th ed., Wiley, Chichester. Zimbardo, P. G., Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Jaffe, D. (1973). The mind is a formidable jailer: A Pirandellian prison. The New York Times Magazine, 8, 38–60.