Site-specific and spatially-distributed ground-motion intensity estimation in the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering - Tập 61 - Trang 83-91 - 2014
Brendon A. Bradley1
1Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

Tài liệu tham khảo

Boore, 2003, Estimated ground motion from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake at the site of the interstate 10 and La Cienega Boulevard bridge collapse, West Los Angeles, California, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 93, 2737, 10.1785/0120020197 Wang, 2005, Macrospatial correlation model of seismic ground motions, Earthq Spectra, 21, 1137, 10.1193/1.2083887 Goda, 2008, Spatial correlation of peak ground motions and response spectra, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 98, 354, 10.1785/0120070078 Jayaram, 2009, Correlation model for spatially distributed ground-motion intensities, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38, 1687, 10.1002/eqe.922 Loth, 2013, A spatial cross-correlation model of spectral accelerations at multiple periods, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 42, 397, 10.1002/eqe.2212 Park J, Bazzurro P, Baker JW. Modelling spatial correlation of ground motion intensity measures for regional seismic hazard and portfolio loss estimation, In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on application of statistics and probability in civil engineering; 2007, 8 p. Jayaram, 2010, 311 Bommer, 2012, Estimating ground motion levels in earthquake damage investigations: a framework for forensic engineering seismology, Int J Foren Eng, 1, 3, 10.1504/IJFE.2012.047444 Stafford, 2012, Evaluation of structural performance in the immediate aftermath of an earthquake: a case study of the 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Int J Foren Eng, 1, 58, 10.1504/IJFE.2012.047447 Bhattacharya, 2013, Probabilistic buckling analysis of axially loaded piles in liquefiable soils, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 45, 13, 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.10.004 Vanmarcke E. Random fields, analysis and synthesis. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachussetts; 1983. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ; 2007. Cubrinovski, 2011, Geotechnical aspects of the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng, 44, 205 Cubrinovski, 2010, Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake, Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng, 43, 243 Quigley, 2013, Recurrent liquefaction in Christchurch, New Zealand, during the Canterbury earthquake sequence, Geology, 41, 419, 10.1130/G33944.1 Cubrinovski, 2011, Soil liquefaction effects in the central business district during the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Seismol Res Lett, 82, 893, 10.1785/gssrl.82.6.893 Canterbury geotechnical database. 〈https://canterburyrecovery.projectorbit.com/SitePages/Home.aspx〉, 2011. Idriss IM, Boulanger RW. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph MNO-12, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, 2008, 261 pp. Cubrinovski M, Hughes M, Bradley BA, MacCahon I, McDonald Y, Simpson H, et al. Liquefaction impacts on pipe networks; 2011. 78 p. Beavan, 2012, Fault slip models of the 2010–2011 Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquakes from geodetic data and observations of postseismic ground deformation, N Z J Geol Geophys, 55, 207, 10.1080/00288306.2012.697472 Ristau, 2008, Implementation of routine regional moment tensor analysis in New Zealand, Seismol Res Lett, 79, 400, 10.1785/gssrl.79.3.400 Stirling MW, Gerstenberger M, Litchfield N, McVerry GH, Smith WD, Pettinga JR, et al. Updated probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Canterbury region; 2007. 58 p. Segou, 2011, Ground motion attenuation during M 7.1 Darfield and M 6.2 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquakes and performance of global predictive models, Seismol Res Lett, 82, 866, 10.1785/gssrl.82.6.866 Bradley, 2012, Strong ground motion characteristics observed in the 4 September 2010 Darfield, New Zealand earthquake, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 4232 Bradley, 2011, Near-source strong ground motions observed in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, Seismol Res Lett, 82, 853, 10.1785/gssrl.82.6.853 Bradley, 2013, A New Zealand-specific pseudospectral acceleration ground-motion prediction equation for active shallow crustal earthquakes based on foreign models, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 103, 1801, 10.1785/0120120021 Bradley, B.A. Systematic ground motion observations in the Canterbury earthquakes and region-specific non-ergodic empirical ground motion modeling. Earthq Spectra, in press Bradley BA. NZ-specific pseudo-spectral acceleration ground motion prediction equations based on foreign models, report no. 2010-03, Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury: Christchurch, New Zealand; 2010. 324 p. Bradley BA. Systematic ground motion observations in the Canterbury earthquakes and region-specific non-ergodic empirical ground motion modelling, report no: 2013-03, Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University of Canterbury: Christchurch, New Zealand; 2013. 74 p. Kawakami, 2003, Analyzing spatial intraevent variability of peak ground accelerations as a function of separation distance, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 93, 1079, 10.1785/0120020026 Goda, 2010, Intraevent spatial correlation of ground-motion parameters using SK-net data, Bull Seismol Soc Am, 100, 3055, 10.1785/0120100031 NZS 1170.5. Structural design actions, Part 5: earthquake actions – New Zealand. Standards New Zealand: Wellington, New Zealand; 2004, 82 p. MBIE. Guidelines for the investigation and assessment of subdivisions on the flat in Canterbury, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment; 2012. 15 p. Bradley B.A. Ground motion aspects of the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake related to the Canterbury Television (CTV) building; 2012. 26 p. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission. Final report: volume 6: Canterbury Television Building (CTV); 2012. 324 p. Sinclair T. CTV building geotechnical advice; Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission Submission, 2012. 24 p.