Tín hiệu từ một văn phòng chịu tác động chính trị: kiểm sát viên tổng quát như một bên kiện trực tiếp trước Tòa án Tối cao Hoa Kỳ

Bailey, M. A., Kamoie, B., & Maltzman, F. (2005). Signals from the tenth justice: The political role of the solicitor general in Supreme Court decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 72–85. Black, R. C., & Owens, R. J. (2011). Solicitor general influence and agenda setting on the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly, 64(4), 765–778. Broder, J. M. (June 29, 2012). Vindication for maligned lawyer in justices’ decision. The New York Times. Caldeira, G. A., & Wright, J. R. (1988). Organized interests and agenda setting in the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1109–1127. Caplan, L. (1987). The tenth justice: The solicitor general and the rule of law. New York, NY: Vintage Books. Carroll, R., Lewis, J. B., Lo, J., Poole, K., & Rosenthal, H. (2009). Measuring bias and uncertainty in DW-NOMINATE ideal point estimates via the parametric bootstrap. Political Analysis, 17(3), 261–275. Citizens United v. Federal Election Committee, 558 U.S. 310 (2010). Clark, T. S. (2010). The limits of judicial independence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Cohen, M. A. (1991). Explaining judicial behavior or what’s ‘unconstitutional’ about the sentencing commission. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 7(1), 183–199. Cohen, M. A. (1992). The motives of judges: Empirical evidence from antitrust sentencing. International Review of Law and Economics, 12(1), 13–30. Collins, J., & Paul, M. (2007). Lobbyists before the U.S. Supreme Court: Investigating the influence of amicus curiae briefs. Political Research Quarterly, 60(1), 55–70. Cooper, J. L. (1990). The solicitor general and the evolution of activism. Indiana Law Journal, 65(3), 675–696. Epstein, L., & Knight, J. (1998). The choices justices make. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. Epstein, L., Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (2013). The behavior of federal judges: A theoretical and empirical study of rational choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Epstein, L., Martin, A. D., Segal, J. A., & Westerland, C. (2007). The judicial common space. The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 23(2), 303–325. Fleck, R. K., & Hanssen, F. A. (2013). Judges: Why do they matter? In M. Reksulak, L. Razzolini, & W. F. Shughart II (Eds.), The Elgar companion to public choice (pp. 233–248). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Galanter, M. (1974). Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9(1), 95–160. Kagan, E. (May 10, 2010). Elena Kagan’s questionnaire for her nomination as solicitor general. The Wall Street Journal. Maltzman, F., Spriggs, J. F., II, & Wahlbeck, P. J. (2000). Crafting law on the Supreme Court: The collegial game. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Martin, A. D., & Quinn, K. M. (2002). Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Politial Analysis, 10(2), 143–153. McGuire, K. T. (1995). Repeat players in the Supreme Court: The role of experienced lawyers in litigation success. Journal of Politics, 57(1), 187–196. McGuire, K. T. (1998). Explaining executive success in the U.S. Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly, 51(2), 505–526. Murphy, W. F. (1973). Elements of judicial strategy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012). O’Connor, K. (1983). The Amicus Curiae role of the U.S. solicitor general in Supreme Court litigation. Judicature, 66, 256–264. Pacelle, R. L., Jr. (2003). Between law and politics: The solicitor general and the structuring of race, gender, and reproductive rights litigation. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press. Perry, H. W., Jr. (1991). Deciding to decide: Agenda setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Pillard, C. T. (2005). The unfulfilled promise of the constitutions in executive hands. Michigan Law Review, 103(4), 676–758. Pritchett, C. Herman. (1941). Divisions of opinion among justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, 1939–1941. American Political Science Review, 35(5), 890–898. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). Rohde, D. W., & Spaeth, H. J. (1976). Supreme court decision making. San Fransisco, CA: Freeman Press. Salokar, R. M. (1992). The solicitor general: The politics of law. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Schubert, G. A. (1965). The judicial mind: The attitudes and ideologies of Supreme Court justices, 1946–1963. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Scigliano, J. A. (1971). The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York, NY: Harper and Row. Segal, J. A. (1988). Amicus Curiae briefs by the solicitor general during the warren and burger courts: A research note. Western Political Quarterly, 41(1), 135–144. Segal, J. A., & Spaeth, H. J. (1993). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Segal, J. A., & Spaeth, H. J. (1996). The influence of stare decisis on the votes of United States Supreme Court Justices. American Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 971–1003. Segal, J. A., & Spaeth, H. J. (2002). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Sheehan, R. S. (1992). Federal agencies and the Supreme Court: An analysis of litigation outcomes, 1953–1988. American Politics Research, 20(4), 478–500. Spriggs, J. F., & Wahlbeck, P. J. (1997). Amicus Curiae and the role of information at the Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly, 50(2), 356–386. Toma, E. F. (1991). Congressional influence and the Supreme Court: The budget as a signaling device. Journal of Legal Studies, 20(1), 131–146. Toma, E. F. (1996). A contractual model of the voting behavior of the Supreme Court: The role of the Chief Justice. International Review of Law and Economics, 16(4), 433–447. Ubertaccio, P. N., III. (2005). Learned in the law and politics: The Office of the solicitor general and executive power. New York, NY: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC. United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013). Wasby, S. L. (1982). Functions and importance of appellate oral argument: Some views of lawyers and federal judges. Judicature, 65(7), 340–353. Wohlfarth, P. C. (2009). The tenth justice? Consequences of politicization in the Solicitor General’s Office. Journal of Politics, 71(1), 224–237. Zorn, C. J. W. (2002). U.S. government litigation strategies in the federal appellate courts. Political Research Quarterly, 55(1), 145–166.