Short-term outcome after cystectomy: comparison of early oral feeding in an enhanced recovery protocol and feeding using Bengmark nasojejunal tube
Tóm tắt
Cystectomy for bladder cancer is associated with a high risk of postoperative complications. Standardized perioperative protocols, such as enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, aim to improve postoperative outcome. Postoperative feeding strategies are an important part of these protocols. In this two-centre study, we compared complications and length of hospital stay (LOS) between an ERAS protocol with early oral nutrition and a protocol with early enteral feeding with a Bengmark nasojejunal tube. We retrospectively reviewed 154 consecutive patients who underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer in two hospitals (Hospital A and B) between 2014 and 2016. Hospital A uses an ERAS protocol (n = 45), which encourages early introduction of an oral diet. Hospital B uses a fast-track protocol comprising feeding with a Bengmark nasojejunal tube (Bengmark-protocol, n = 109). LOS and complications according to Clavien classification were compared between protocols. Overall 30-day complication rates in the ERAS and Bengmark protocol were similar (64.4 and 67.0%, respectively; p = 0.463). The rate of postoperative ileus (POI) was significantly lower in the Bengmark protocol (11.9% vs. 34.4% in the ERAS protocol, p = 0.009). This association remained significant after adjustment for other variables (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.11–0.96; p = 0.042). Median LOS did not differ significantly between protocols (10 days vs. 11 days in the ERAS and Bengmark protocols, respectively; p = 0.861). Early oral nutrition in Hospital A was well tolerated. However, the Bengmark protocol was superior with respect to occurrence of POI. A prospective study may clarify whether the lower rate of POI was due to the use of early nasojejunal tube feeding or other reasons.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC et al (2009) Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 55:164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031
De Nunzio C, Cindolo L, Leonardo C et al (2013) Analysis of radical cystectomy and urinary diversion complications with the Clavien classification system in an Italian real life cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:792–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.008
Novara G, Catto JWF, Wilson T et al (2015) Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 67:376–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007
Ramirez JA, McIntosh AG, Strehlow R et al (2013) Definition, incidence, risk factors, and prevention of paralytic ileus following radical cystectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 64:588–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.051
Chang SS, Baumgartner RG, Wells N, Cookson MSSJ (2002) Analysis of early complications after radical cystectomy: results of a collaborative care pathway. J Urol 167:2012–2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65074-4
Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub D, Dunn RL, Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Montie JE, Underwood W 3rd, WEI JT (2005) Identifying risk factor for potentially avoidable complications following radical cystectomy. J Urol 174:1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000173923.35338.99
Baack Kukreja JE, Messing EM, Shah JB (2016) Are we doing “better”? The discrepancy between perception and practice of enhanced recovery after cystectomy principles among urologic oncologists. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig 34:120.e17–120.e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.10.002
Holzhauer C, Weijerman PC, Smits GAHJ, Wijburg CJ (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) effectief bij robotgeassisteerde radicale cystectomie (RARC); standaardisatie gewenst. Tijdschr voor Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13629-016-0138-z
Charlson M, Szatrowski T, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47(11):1245–1251
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Tyson M, Chang S (2016) Enhanced recovery pathways versus standard care after cystectomy: a meta-analysis of the effect on perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol 2016:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.031
Donat SM (2007) Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. Urology 69:221–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.056
Collins JW, Patel H, Adding C et al (2016) Enhanced recovery after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: EAU robotic urology section scientific working group consensus view. Eur Urol 70:649–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.020
Simpson JC, Moonesinghe SR, Grocott MPW et al (2015) Enhanced recovery from surgery in the UK: an audit of the enhanced recovery partnership programme 2009–2012. Br J Anaesth 115:560–568. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev105
Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S (2009) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 13:569–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0592-x
Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 32:879–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2013.09.014
Matulewicz RS, Brennan J, Pruthi RS et al (2015) Radical cystectomy perioperative care redesign. Urology 86:1076–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.001
Deibert CM, Silva MV, RoyChoudhury A et al (2016) A prospective randomized trial of the effects of early enteral feeding after radical cystectomy. Urology 96:69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.045
Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester P, Thomas S (2001) Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ 323:773–776. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7316.773
De Vries RR, Kauer P, Van Tinteren H et al (2012) Short-term outcome after cystectomy: comparison of two different perioperative protocols. Urol Int 88:383–389. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336155
Marret E, Remy C, Bonnet F et al (2007) Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:665–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5825
Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD et al (2015) Comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 67:1042–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043