Short-Term Semantic Changes in Space-Related Categories in Russian Media Discourse
Tóm tắt
This study is identifies semantic features of space-related topics and continues a major study of the coverage of space-related issues in Russian media resources. In this context, space-related topics are understood as a set of words associated with the category of space and used together in sociocultural media discourse. At this stage, the goal of the study is to reveal contextual changes of short-term value in the semantic field of the topic Space in leading Russian federal newspapers, such as Komsomolskaya Pravda, Rossiyskaya Gazeta, and Kommersant, as well as in Russian online media, such as Lenta.Ru and Gazeta.ru. For this purpose, a corpus of 9872 publications with the keywords as space* or cosmic* is created, including 3964 articles for 2020 and 5908 articles for 2021. The study was conducted from January, 2020 until December, 2021. In addition to revealing the dynamics of the increase in the specific share of space-related publications for 2020–2021, the authentic methodology allows analyzing topical trends of the space agenda and its geographical characteristics, describing the semantic field of space-related categories, and showing its key changes over time.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Vartanova, E. and Gladkova, A., From digital divides to epistemic divides: the rise of new inequalities in the conflict media space, World Media: J. Russ. Media Journalism Stud., 2022, no. 4, pp. 5–22.
Vladimirova, T.N., Panferova, V.V., Smirnova, O.V., Svitich, L.G., and Shkondin, M.V., Journalism and intellectual potential of society: Theoretial approaches to system analysis of intellectual interaction in media landscape, Vopr. Teorii Praktiki Zhurnalistiki, 2020, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 90–105. https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2020.9(1).90-105
Gureeva, A.N., Kontseptualizatsiya protsessa mediatizatsii v Rossii i za rubezhom, Mediaal’manakh, 2018, no. 5(88), pp. 16–21.
Smirnova, O.V., Denisova, G.V., Pankeev, I.A., Ilchenko, D.S., and Antipova, A.S., Problems of space in modern Russian media discourse (2020-2021), Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2022, no. 2, pp. 144–148. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688222020113
Vartanova, E.L., Dynamics of the general and special: Modern theoretical approaches to analysis of the Russia media system, Paralleli i meridiany mediaprostranstva (Parallels and Meridians of Media Space), Moscow: Fakul’tet Zhurnalistiki Mosk. Gos. Univ., 2014.
Al Farsi, B.H., Word meaning in word identification during reading: Co-occurrence-based semantic neighborhood density effects, Appl. Psycholinguist., 2018, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 779–809. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000583
Traugott, E. and Dasher, R., Regularity in Semantic Change, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001.
Martinc, M., Novak, P.K., and Pollak, S., Leveraging contextual embeddings for detecting diachronic semantic shift, Proc. Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conf., Marseille, 2020, European Language Resources Association, 2019, pp. 4811–4819. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.592.
Heyer, G., Kantner, C., Niekler, A., Overbeck, M., and Wiedemann, G., Modeling the dynamics of domain specific terminology in diachronic corpora, 2017. arXiv:1707.03255 [cs.CL]
Traugott, E.C., Semantic change, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2017, pp. 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.323
Sweetser, E., From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.
Paradis, C., Metonymization: A key mechanism in semantic change, defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Toward a consensus view, Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics, Benczes, R., Barcelona, A., Ruiz, F.J., and de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J.R., Eds., John Benjamins Publishing, 2011, pp. 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28
Geeraerts, D. and Cuyckens, H., Introducing cognitive linguistics, The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Geeraerts, D. and Cuyckens, H., Eds., Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2007, pp. 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0001
Lakoff, G., Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2008.
Johnson, M., The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2013.
Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A., Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics Across Domains, Languages, and Cultures, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2013.
Kay, P., Synchronic variability and diachronic change in basic color terms, Language Soc., 1975, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006667
Currents Methods in Historical Semantics, Allan, K. and Robinson, J.A., Eds., Topics in English Linguistics, vol. 73, De Gruyter Mouton, 2012, pp. 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110252903
Hilpert, M., Germanic Future Constructions: A Usage-Based Approach to Language Change, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2008.
Newman, J., Semantic shift, The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, New York: Routledge, 2016, pp. 266–280.
Hilpert, M., Diachronic collostructional analysis meets the noun phrase: Studying many a noun in COHA, The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Nevalainen, T. and Traugott, E.C., Eds., Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012, pp. 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0022
Fitzmaurice, S.M., Semantic and pragmatic change, The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Kyto, M. and Pahta, P., Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016, pp. 256–270.
Dubossarsky, H., Semantic change at large: a computational approach for semantic change research, PhD Thesis, Jerusalem: Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, 2018.
Hilpert, M., Glynn, M., and Robinson, J., Collostructional analysis: Measuring associations between constructions and lexical elements, Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy, Glynn, D. and Robinson, J.A., Eds., Human Cognitive Processing, vol. 43, New York: John Benjamins, 2014, pp. 391–404.
Kozlovskaya, N.V., Rastyagaev, A.V., and Slozhenikina, J.V., The creative potential of contemporary Russian political discourse: from new words to new paradigms, Training, Language Culture, 2020, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 78–90. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2020-4-4-78-90
Kiose, M., Linguistic creativity in discourse: The research perspective of cognitive semiotics, Ural. Filologicheskii Vestn. Ser.: Yazyk. Sistema. Lichnost’: Lingvistika Kreativa, 2020, no. 2, pp. 37–47. https://doi.org/10.26170/ufv20-02-03
Wierzbicka, A., Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991.
Wierzbicka, A., Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1992.
Zaliznyak, A.A., Levontina, I.B., and Shmelev, A.D., Konstanty i peremennye russkoi yazykovoi kartiny mira (Constants and Variables of the Russian Language World View), Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul’tury, 2012.
Smirnova, O.V., Denisova, G.V., and Antipova, A.S., Dynamics of semantics and pragmatics of conflictogenic texts in Russian mass media in 2020–2021, Filologicheskie Nauki. Nauchn. Dokl. Vysshei Shk., 2022, no. 6, pp. 136–143. https://doi.org/10.20339/PhS.6-22.136